The purpose of this study was to examine the difference in the position of bone tunnels prepared by the transportal technique versus the transtibial technique in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
A consecutive series of 42 patients receiving single-bundle ACL reconstructions were recruited between July 1, 2007, and December 31, 2008. The preparations of the femoral tunnel were performed by the transtibial technique in the first 21 cases and by the transportal technique in the subsequent 21 cases. Magnetic resonance imaging examination was performed in 39 patients (93%) 1 year after the index operation (20 transtibial and 19 transportal). Optimal tunnel position was defined as a lateralized femoral tunnel at a position of less than 11 o'clock for a right knee or more than 1 o'clock for a left knee, an adequate posteriorized femoral tunnel in the fourth quadrant of the modified Bernard line, and a tibial tunnel located in the second quadrant of the modified Amis line.
The average clock position was 10:18 in the transportal group and 10:54 in the transtibial group (P < .001). Five outliers were found in the transtibial group but none in the transportal group. Concerning the femoral tunnel position on the sagittal-cut magnetic resonance imaging scan, the average position along the modified Bernard line was 74% in the transportal group and 69% in the transtibial group (P = .029). Concerning the tibial tunnel position, the average tibial tunnel positions along the modified Amis line were 47% and 52%, respectively (P = .019).
The adoption of the transportal technique in single-bundle ACL reconstruction produced improved positions in both the femoral and tibial tunnels when compared with the transtibial technique.
Level of Evidence
Level III, case-control study.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Arthroscopy
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Measurement of the graft angles for the anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with transtibial technique using postoperative magnetic resonance imaging in comparative study.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007; 15: 1293-1300
- Single-incision technique misses the anatomical femoral anterior cruciate ligament insertion: A cadaver study.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001; 9: 194-199
- Differences in graft orientation using the transtibial and anteromedial portal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A magnetic resonance imaging study.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009; 17: 880-886
- Nonanatomic tunnel position in traditional single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92: 1427-1431
- The ability of 3 different approaches to restore the anatomic anteromedial bundle femoral insertion site during anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 200-206
- Comparison of 4 femoral tunnel drilling techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Arthroscopy. 2012; 28: 972-979
- Prevalence of nonanatomical graft placement in a series of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38: 1987-1996
- Variations in the three-dimensional location and orientation of the ACL in healthy subjects relative to patients after transtibial ACL reconstruction.J Orthop Res. 2012; 30: 910-918
- Comparisons of femoral tunnel position and length in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Modified transtibial versus anteromedial portal techniques.Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 1389-1394
- Femoral bone tunnel placement using the transtibial tunnel or the anteromedial portal in ACL reconstruction: A radiographic evaluation.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009; 17: 220-227
- A simple evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament femoral tunnel position: The inclination angle and femoral tunnel angle.Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 2611-2618
- The effects of extra-articular starting point and transtibial femoral drilling on the intra-articular aperture of the tibial tunnel in ACL reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38: 707-712
- ACL reconstruction: Comparison between transtibial and anteromedial portal techniques.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20: 896-903
- Femoral tunnel placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An in vivo imaging analysis comparing transtibial and 2-incision tibial tunnel-independent techniques.Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 1904-1911
- Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in ACL reconstruction: A blinded cross-sectional study at two- to five-year follow-up.Int Orthop. 2010; 34: 747-754
- Prospective randomized clinical evaluation of conventional single-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 281 cases with 3- to 5-year follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40: 512-520
- Double-bundle ACL reconstruction can improve rotational stability.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 454: 100-107
- Transtibial versus anteromedial portal reaming in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: An anatomic and biomechanical evaluation of surgical technique.Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 380-390
- The relationship between femoral tunnels created by the transtibial, anteromedial portal, and outside-in techniques and the anterior cruciate ligament footprint.Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40: 882-888
- Transtibial versus anteromedial portal of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction: A cadaveric study.Knee. 2008; 15: 364-367
- Independent drilling outperforms conventional transtibial drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 1912-1919
- Anatomic femoral tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Use of an accessory medial portal versus traditional transtibial drilling.Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40: 1313-1321
- Alternative soft-tissue graft preparation technique for cruciate ligament reconstruction.Arthroscopy. 2000; 16: e20
- Single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Technique overview and comprehensive review of results.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 67-74
- Intraoperative and postoperative insertion control of anterior cruciate ligament-plasty. A radiologic measuring method (quadrant method).Unfallchirurg. 1996; 99 (in German): 332-340
- Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998; 6: S2-S12
- Advances in the three-portal technique for anatomical single- or double-bundle ACL reconstruction.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19: 1239-1242
- Three-portal technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Use of a central medial portal.Arthroscopy. 2007; 23: 325.e1-325.e5
- Comparison of anterior cruciate ligament tunnel position and graft obliquity with transtibial and anteromedial portal femoral tunnel reaming techniques using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 1511-1522
- A computerized analysis of femoral condyle radii in ACL intact and contralateral ACL reconstructed knees using 3D CT.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18: 26-31
- The effects of limb alignment on anterior cruciate ligament graft tunnel positions estimated from plain radiographs.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20: 979-985
- Is femoral tunnel length correlated with the intercondylar notch and femoral condyle geometry after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction suing the transportal technique? An in vivo computed tomography analysis.Arthroscopy. 2012; 28: 1094-1103
Published online: April 15, 2013
Accepted: February 12, 2013
Received: June 15, 2012
The authors report that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this article.
© 2013 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.