Scientific Committee Report| Volume 30, ISSUE 2, P271-278, February 2014

ISAKOS Upper Extremity Committee Consensus Statement on the Need for Diversification of the Rockwood Classification for Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries

      Optimal treatment for the unstable acromioclavicular (AC) joint remains a highly debated topic in the field of orthopaedic medicine. In particular, no consensus exists regarding treatment of grade III injuries, which are classified according to the Rockwood classification by disruption of both the coracoclavicular and AC ligaments. The ISAKOS Upper Extremity Committee has provided a more specific classification of shoulder pathologies to enhance the knowledge on and clinical approach to these injuries. We suggest the addition of grade IIIA and grade IIIB injuries to a modified Rockwood classification. Grade IIIA injuries would be defined by a stable AC joint without overriding of the clavicle on the cross-body adduction view and without significant scapular dysfunction. The unstable grade IIIB injury would be further defined by therapy-resistant scapular dysfunction and an overriding clavicle on the cross-body adduction view.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Tamaoki M.J.
        • Belloti J.C.
        • Lenza M.
        • et al.
        Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; : CD007429
        • Rockwood Jr., C.A.
        Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint: Subluxations and dislocations about the shoulder.
        in: Rockwood Jr., C.A. Green D.P. Fractures in adults. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia1984: 860-910
        • Tossy J.D.
        • Mead N.C.
        • Sigmond H.M.
        Acromioclavicular separations: Useful and practical classification for treatment.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1963; 28: 111-119
        • Beitzel K.
        • Cote M.P.
        • Apostolakos J.
        • et al.
        Current concepts in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations.
        Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 387-397
        • Trainer G.
        • Arciero R.A.
        • Mazzocca A.D.
        Practical management of grade III acromioclavicular separations.
        Clin J Sport Med. 2008; 18: 162-166
        • Zanca P.
        Shoulder pain: Involvement of the acromioclavicular joint. (Analysis of 1,000 cases.).
        Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med. 1971; 112: 493-506
        • Rahm S.
        • Wieser K.
        • Spross C.
        • Vich M.
        • Gerber C.
        • Meyer D.C.
        Standard axillary radiographs of the shoulder may mimic posterior subluxation of the lateral end of the clavicle.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2013; 27: 622-626
        • Barnes C.J.
        • Higgins L.D.
        • Major N.M.
        • Basamania C.J.
        Magnetic resonance imaging of the coracoclavicular ligaments: Its role in defining pathoanatomy at the acromioclavicular joint.
        J Surg Orthop Adv. 2004; 13: 69-75
        • Alexander O.M.
        Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint.
        Radiography. 1949; 15 (illust): 260
        • Tischer T.
        • Salzmann G.M.
        • El-Azab H.
        • Vogt S.
        • Imhoff A.B.
        Incidence of associated injuries with acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations types III through V.
        Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 136-139
        • Chronopoulos E.
        • Kim T.K.
        • Park H.B.
        • Ashenbrenner D.
        • McFarland E.G.
        Diagnostic value of physical tests for isolated chronic acromioclavicular lesions.
        Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32: 655-661
        • Seo Y.J.
        • Yoo Y.S.
        • Noh K.C.
        • et al.
        Dynamic function of coracoclavicular ligament at different shoulder abduction angles: A study using a 3-dimensional finite element model.
        Arthroscopy. 2012; 28: 778-787
        • Izadpanah K.
        • Weitzel E.
        • Honal M.
        • et al.
        In vivo analysis of coracoclavicular ligament kinematics during shoulder abduction.
        Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40: 185-192
        • Ludewig P.M.
        • Phadke V.
        • Braman J.P.
        • Hassett D.R.
        • Cieminski C.J.
        • LaPrade R.F.
        Motion of the shoulder complex during multiplanar humeral elevation.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91: 378-389
        • Kibler W.B.
        • Sciascia A.
        Current concepts: Scapular dyskinesis.
        Br J Sports Med. 2010; 44: 300-305
        • Kibler W.B.
        • Ludewig P.M.
        • McClure P.W.
        • Michener L.A.
        • Bak K.
        • Sciascia A.D.
        Clinical implications of scapular dyskinesis in shoulder injury: The 2013 consensus statement from the 'Scapular Summit.'.
        Br J Sports Med. 2013; 47: 877-885
        • Cote M.P.
        • Wojcik K.E.
        • Gomlinski G.
        • Mazzocca A.D.
        Rehabilitation of acromioclavicular joint separations: Operative and nonoperative considerations.
        Clin Sports Med. 2010; 29 (vii): 213-228
        • Gladstone J.N.
        • Wilk K.E.
        • Andrews J.R.
        Nonoperative treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries.
        Oper Tech Sports Med. 1997; 5: 78-87