Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 30, ISSUE 2, P202-207, February 2014

Download started.

Ok

Symptoms of Nerve Dysfunction After Hip Arthroscopy: An Under-Reported Complication?

      Purpose

      The primary purpose of this study was to analyze the rate, pattern, and severity of symptoms of nerve dysfunction after hip arthroscopy (HA) by reviewing prospectively collected data. The secondary purpose was to study whether symptoms of nerve dysfunction were related to traction time.

      Methods

      From March to October 2010, 52 consecutive patients—27 male patients (mean age, 40 years; range, 21 to 63 years) and 25 female patients (mean age, 37 years; range, 15 to 60 years), underwent HA with labral repair, rim trimming, and osteoplasty. The patients received a follow-up questionnaire 1 year after HA concerning symptoms of nerve dysfunction, possible localization, and erectile dysfunction. Fifty patients participated and returned fully completed questionnaires. Patients reporting symptoms of nerve dysfunction 1 year after HA were re-examined.

      Results

      Twenty-three of 50 patients (46%) reported symptoms of nerve dysfunction during the first week after HA; this was reduced to 14 patients (28%) after 6 weeks, 11 patients (22%) after 26 weeks, and 9 patients (18%) after 1 year. One patient experienced temporary erectile dysfunction. No difference in traction time between patients with symptoms of nerve dysfunction (n = 23) and patients without (n = 27) was found (98 minutes v 100 minutes; P = .88).

      Conclusions

      Forty-six percent of patients undergoing HA reported symptoms of nerve dysfunction within the first 6 weeks after surgery. One year postoperatively, these symptoms remained in only 18% of all patients. Traction time during surgery was not different in patients with and those without symptoms of nerve dysfunction.

      Level of Evidence

      Level IV, therapeutic case series.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Byrd J.W.T.
        Hip arthroscopy utilizing the supine position.
        Arthroscopy. 1994; 10: 275-280
        • Clarke M.T.
        • Arora A.
        • Villar R.N.
        Hip arthroscopy: Complications in 1054 cases.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 406: 84-88
        • Khanduja V.
        • Villar R.N.
        Arthroscopic surgery of the hip: Current concepts and recent advances.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006; 88: 1557-1566
        • Merrell G.
        • Medvecky M.
        • Daigneault J.
        • Jokl P.
        Hip arthroscopy without a perineal post: A safer technique for hip distraction.
        Arthroscopy. 2007; 23: 107
        • Shetty V.D.
        • Villar R.N.
        Hip arthroscopy: Current concepts and review of literature.
        Br J Sports Med. 2007; 41: 64-68
        • Lo Y.P.
        • Chan Y.S.
        • Lien L.C.
        • Lee M.S.
        • Hsu K.Y.
        • Shih C.H.
        Complications of hip arthroscopy: Analysis of seventy three cases.
        Chang Gung Med J. 2006; 29: 86-92
        • Glick J.
        Hip arthroscopy: The lateral approach.
        Clin Sports Med. 2001; 20: 733-747
        • Sampson T.G.
        Complications of hip arthroscopy.
        Clin Sports Med. 2001; 20: 831-835
        • Rodeo S.A.
        • Forster R.A.
        • Weiland A.J.
        Neurological complications due to arthroscopy.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75: 917-926
        • Larson C.M.
        • Giveans M.R.
        Arthroscopic debridement versus refixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement.
        Arthroscopy. 2009; 25: 369-376
        • Dienst M.
        • Gödde S.
        • Seil R.
        • Kohn D.
        Diagnostische Arthroskopie des Hüftgelenks.
        Operat Orthop Traumatol. 2002; 14: 1-15
        • Mason J.B.
        • McCarthy J.C.
        • O'Donnell J.
        • et al.
        Hip arthroscopy: Surgical approach, positioning, and distraction.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 406: 29-37
        • Brumback R.J.
        • Ellison T.S.
        • Molligan H.
        • Molligan D.J.
        • Mahaffey S.
        • Schmidhauser C.
        Pudendal nerve palsy complicating intramedullary nailing of the femur.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992; 74: 1450-1455
        • Kao J.T.
        • Burton D.
        • Comstock C.
        • McClellan R.T.
        • Carragee E.
        Pudendal nerve palsy after femoral intramedullary nailing.
        J Orthop Trauma. 1993; 7: 58-63
        • Philippon M.J.
        • Briggs K.K.
        • Yen Y.M.
        • Kuppersmith D.A.
        Outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement with associated chondrolabral dysfunction: Minimum two-year follow-up.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91: 16-23
        • Byrd J.W.T.
        • Jones K.S.
        Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: Minimum 2-year follow-up.
        Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 1379-1388
        • Leunig M.
        • Beck M.
        • Dora C.
        • Ganz R.
        Femoroacetabular impingement: Trigger for the development of coxarthrosis.
        Orthopade. 2006; 35 ([in German]): 77-84
        • Kamath A.F.
        • Componovo R.
        • Baldwin K.
        • Israelite C.L.
        • Nelson C.L.
        Hip arthroscopy for labral tears: Review of clinical outcomes with 4.8-year mean follow-up.
        Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 1721-1727
        • Espinosa N.
        • Rothenfluh D.A.
        • Beck M.
        • Ganz R.
        • Leunig M.
        Treatment of femoro-acetabular impingement: preliminary results of labral refixation.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 925-935
        • Larson C.M.
        • Giveans M.R.
        • Stone R.M.
        Arthroscopic debridement versus refixation of the acetabular labrum associated with femoroacetabular impingement: Mean 3.5-year follow-up.
        Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40: 1015-1021
        • Jerosch J.
        • Schneider T.
        • Strauss J.M.
        • Schürmann N.
        Arthroscopy of the upper ankle joint. List of indications from the literature-realistic expectations—complications.
        Unfallchirurg. 1996; 96 ([in German]): 82-87
        • Albrecht-Olsen P.
        • Kristensen G.
        • Burgaard P.
        • et al.
        The arrow versus horizontal suture in arthroscopic meniscus repair. A prospective randomized study with arthroscopic evaluation.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999; 7: 268-273
        • Figueroa D.
        • Calvo R.
        • Vaisman A.
        • Campero M.
        • Moraga C.
        Injury to the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve in ACL reconstruction with the hamstrings technique: Clinical and electrophysiological study.
        Knee. 2008; 15: 360-363
        • Rajbabu K.
        • Brown C.
        • Poulsen J.
        Erectile dysfunction after perineal compression in young men undergoing internal fixation of femur fractures.
        Int J Impot Res. 2007; 19: 336-338
        • Mallet R.
        • Tricoire J.L.
        • Rischmann P.
        • Sarramon J.P.
        • Puget J.
        • Malavaud B.
        High prevalence of erectile dysfunction in young male patients after intramedullary femoral nailing.
        Urology. 2005; 65: 559-563