Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 31, ISSUE 10, P1962-1973, October 2015

Two-Year Outcomes After Primary Anatomic Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction

      Purpose

      The purpose of this study was to report the clinical and structural outcomes after anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction (ACCR) with free tendon allografts in patients with grade III and grade V acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocations.

      Methods

      Thirty-one shoulders underwent primary ACCR with tendon allografts for Rockwood grade III and grade V AC joint dislocations. Preoperative data included patient demographic characteristics, injury characteristics, and surgical history, along with American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, Short Form 12 Physical Component Summary (SF-12 PCS) scores, and various pain scales. Outcome measures were also collected a minimum of 2 years postoperatively with the addition of Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores; Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) scores; and patient satisfaction. In addition, preoperative and postoperative coracoclavicular distances were analyzed using standard anteroposterior radiographs.

      Results

      ACCR was performed in 31 patients (31 shoulders) with a mean age of 43.9 years (range, 21 to 71 years). In 7 patients (22.6%) a complication occurred that required a subsequent surgical procedure including graft rupture/attenuation (2), clavicle fractures (2), distal clavicle hypertrophy (2), and adhesive capsulitis (1). Of the remaining 24 patients, 20 (83.3%) had subjective outcome data available after a minimum 2-year follow-up period (mean, 3.5 years; range, 2.0 to 6.2 years). The mean postoperative ASES and SF-12 PCS scores significantly improved when compared with the preoperative baseline values (58.9 v 93.8 for ASES scores [P < .001] and 45.3 v 54.4 for SF-12 PCS scores [P = .007]). At final follow-up, the SANE and QuickDASH scores were 89.1 and 5.6, respectively, with a median patient satisfaction rating of 9 of 10.

      Conclusions

      Patients who did not require revision surgery showed excellent postoperative outcome scores: The mean ASES score was 93.8, the mean SANE score was 89.1, and the mean QuickDASH score was 5.6, with a median patient satisfaction rating of 9 of 10. Further study regarding ACCR techniques should focus on decreasing the risks of complications and maintaining reduction of the AC joint.

      Level of Evidence

      Level IV, therapeutic case series.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Agel J.
        • Dompier T.P.
        • Dick R.
        • Marshall S.W.
        Descriptive epidemiology of collegiate men’s ice hockey injuries: National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System, 1988-1989 through 2003-2004.
        J Athl Train. 2007; 42: 241-248
        • Dick R.
        • Romani W.A.
        • Agel J.
        • Case J.G.
        • Marshall S.W.
        Descriptive epidemiology of collegiate men’s lacrosse injuries: National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System, 1988-1989 through 2003-2004.
        J Athl Train. 2007; 42: 255-261
        • Kaplan L.D.
        • Flanigan D.C.
        • Norwig J.
        • Jost P.
        • Bradley J.
        Prevalence and variance of shoulder injuries in elite collegiate football players.
        Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33: 1142-1146
        • Lynch T.S.
        • Saltzman M.D.
        • Ghodasra J.H.
        • Bilimoria K.Y.
        • Bowen M.K.
        • Number G.W.
        Acromioclavicular joint injuries in the National Football League: Epidemiology and management.
        Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41: 2904-2908
        • Pallis M.
        • Cameron K.L.
        • Svoboda S.J.
        • Owens B.D.
        Epidemiology of acromioclavicular joint injury in young athletes.
        Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40: 2072-2077
        • Rockwood C.A.
        Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint.
        in: Vol. 1 Ed 2. Fractures in adults. JB Lippincott, Philadelphia1984: 860
        • Beitzel K.
        • Mazzocca A.D.
        • Bak K.
        • et al.
        ISAKOS upper extremity committee consensus statement on the need for diversification of the Rockwood classification for acromioclavicular joint injuries.
        Arthroscopy. 2014; 30: 271-278
        • Ceccarelli E.
        • Bondi R.
        • Alviti F.
        • Garofalo R.
        • Miulli F.
        • Padua R.
        Treatment of acute grade III acromioclavicular dislocation: A lack of evidence.
        J Orthop Traumatol. 2008; 9: 105-108
        • Dias J.J.
        • Steingold R.F.
        • Richardson R.A.
        • Tesfayohannes B.
        • Gregg P.J.
        The conservative treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation. Review after five years.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987; 69: 719-722
        • Millett P.J.
        • Braun S.
        • Gobeze R.
        • Pacheco I.H.
        Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction with coracoacromial ligament transfer using the docking technique.
        BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009; 10: 6
        • Rolf O.
        • Hann von Weyhern A.
        • Ewers A.
        • Boehm T.D.
        • Gohlke F.
        Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood III-V: Results of early versus delayed surgical treatment.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008; 128: 1153-1157
        • Scheibel M.
        • Dröschel S.
        • Gerhardt C.
        • Kraus N.
        Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations.
        Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 1507-1516
        • Tamaoki M.J.
        • Belloti J.C.
        • Lenza M.
        • Matsumoto M.H.
        • Gomes Dos Santos J.B.
        • Faloppa F.
        Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating acromioclavicular dislocation of the shoulder in adults.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; : CD007429
        • Weaver J.K.
        • Dunn H.K.
        Treatment of acromioclavicular injuries, especially complete acromioclavicular separation.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972; 54: 1187-1194
        • Clevenger T.
        • Vance R.E.
        • Bachus K.N.
        • Burks R.T.
        • Tashjian R.Z.
        Biomechanical comparison of acromioclavicular joint reconstructions using coracoclavicular tendon grafts with and without coracoacromial ligament transfer.
        Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 24-30
        • Grutter P.W.
        • Petersen S.A.
        Anatomical acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction: A biomechanical comparison of reconstructive techniques of the acromioclavicular joint.
        Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33: 1723-1728
        • Lee S.J.
        • Nicholas S.J.
        • Akizuki K.H.
        • McHugh M.P.
        • Kremenic I.J.
        • Ben-Avi S.
        Reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments with tendon grafts: A comparative biomechanical study.
        Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31: 648-655
        • Lee S.J.
        • Keefer E.P.
        • McHugh M.P.
        • et al.
        Cyclical loading of coracoclavicular ligament reconstructions: A comparative biomechanical study.
        Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36: 1990-1997
        • Mazzocca A.D.
        • Santangelo S.A.
        • Johnson S.T.
        • Rios C.G.
        • Dumonski M.L.
        • Arciero R.A.
        A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.
        Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34: 236-246
        • Michlitsch M.G.
        • Adamson G.J.
        • Pink M.
        • Estess A.
        • Shankwiler J.A.
        • Lee T.Q.
        Biomechanical comparison of a modified Weaver-Dunn and a free-tissue graft reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint complex.
        Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38: 1196-1203
        • Pauly S.
        • Kraus N.
        • Greiner S.
        • Scheibel M.
        Prevalence and pattern of glenohumeral injuries among acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint instabilities.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22: 760-766
        • Pauly S.
        • Gerhardt C.
        • Haas N.P.
        • Scheibel M.
        Prevalence of concomitant intraarticular lesions in patients treated operatively for high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009; 17: 513-517
        • Tischer T.
        • Salzmann G.M.
        • El-Azab H.
        • Vogt S.
        • Imhoff A.B.
        Incidence of associated injuries with acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations types III through V.
        Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 136-139
        • Carofino B.C.
        • Mazzocca A.D.
        The anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: Surgical technique and indications.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19: 37-46
        • Rios C.G.
        • Arciero R.A.
        • Mazzocca A.D.
        Anatomy of the clavicle and coracoid process for reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments.
        Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35: 811-817
        • Ponce B.A.
        • Millett P.J.
        • Warner J.J.P.
        AC joint instability—Reconstruction indications and technique.
        Oper Tech Sports Med. 2004; 12: 35-42
        • Flint J.H.
        • Wade A.M.
        • Giuliani J.
        • Rue J.P.
        Defining the terms acute and chronic in orthopaedic sports injuries: A systematic review.
        Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 235-241
        • Fleiss J.L.
        The design and analysis of clinical experiments.
        Wiley, New York1986
        • Jones H.P.
        • Lemos M.J.
        • Schepsis A.A.
        Salvage of failed acromioclavicular joint reconstruction using autogenous semitendinosus tendon from the knee: Surgical technique and case report.
        Am J Sports Med. 2001; 29: 234-237
        • Nicholas S.J.
        • Lee S.J.
        • Mullaney M.J.
        • Tyler T.F.
        • McHugh M.P.
        Clinical outcomes of coracoclavicular ligament reconstructions using tendon grafts.
        Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35: 1912-1917
        • Tauber M.
        • Gordon K.
        • Koller H.
        • Fox M.
        • Resch H.
        Semitendinosus tendon graft versus a modified Weaver-Dunn procedure for acromioclavicular joint reconstruction in chronic cases: A prospective comparative study.
        Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 181-190
        • Yoo J.C.
        • Ahn J.H.
        • Yoon J.R.
        • Yang J.H.
        Clinical results of single-tunnel coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using autogenous semitendinosus tendon.
        Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38: 950-957
        • Yoo Y.S.
        • Seo Y.J.
        • Noh K.C.
        • Patro B.P.
        • Kim D.Y.
        Arthroscopically assisted anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction using tendon graft.
        Int Orthop. 2011; 35: 1025-1030
        • Milewski M.D.
        • Tompkins M.
        • Giugale J.M.
        • Carson E.W.
        • Miller M.D.
        • Diduch D.R.
        Complications related to anatomic reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments.
        Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40: 1628-1634
        • Cook J.B.
        • Shaha J.S.
        • Rowles D.J.
        • Bottoni C.R.
        • Shaha S.H.
        • Tokish J.M.
        Early failures with single clavicular transosseous coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 21: 1746-1752
        • Cook J.B.
        • Shaha J.S.
        • Rowles D.J.
        • Bottoni C.R.
        • Shaha S.H.
        • Tokish J.M.
        Clavicular bone tunnel malposition leads to early failures in coracoclavicular ligament reconstructions.
        Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41: 142-148
        • Martetschläger F.
        • Horan M.P.
        • Warth R.J.
        • Millett P.J.
        Complications after anatomic fixation and reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments.
        Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41: 2896-2903
        • Fauci F.
        • Merolla G.
        • Paladini P.
        • Campi F.
        • Porcellini G.
        Surgical treatment of chronic acromioclavicular dislocation with biologic graft vs synthetic ligament: A prospective randomized comparative study.
        J Orthop Traumatol. 2013; 14: 283-290
        • Jensen G.
        • Katthagen J.C.
        • Alvarado L.
        • Lill H.
        • Voigt C.
        Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of chronic AC-joint instabilities in GraftRope technique with an additive horizontal tendon augmentation.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013; 133: 841-851
        • Mardani-Kivi M.
        • Mirbolook A.
        • Salariyeh M.
        • Hashemi-Motlagh K.
        • Saheb-Ekhtiari K.
        The comparison of Ethibond sutures and semitendinosus autograft in the surgical treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation.
        Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2013; 47: 307-310
        • Gumina S.
        • Carbone S.
        • Postacchini F.
        Scapular dyskinesis and SICK scapular syndrome in patients with chronic type III acromioclavicular dislocation.
        Arthroscopy. 2009; 25: 40-45
        • Oki S.
        • Matsumura N.
        • Iwamoto W.
        • et al.
        The function of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments in shoulder motion: A whole-cadaver study.
        Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40: 2617-2626
      1. Carbone S, Postacchini R, Gumina S. Scapular dyskinesis and SICK syndrome in patients with a chronic type III acromioclavicular dislocation. Results of rehabilitation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc in press, available online 24 January, 2014. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-2844-5.

        • Murena L.
        • Canton G.
        • Culcano E.
        • Cherubino P.
        Scapular dyskinesis and SICK scapular syndrome following surgical treatment of type III acute acromioclavicular dislocations.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 21: 1146-1150
        • Graichen H.
        • Hinterwimmer S.
        • von Eisenhart-Rothe R.
        • Vogl T.
        • Englmeier K.H.
        • Eckstein F.
        Effect of abducting and adducting muscle activity on glenohumeral translation, scapular kinematics and subacromial space width in vivo.
        J Biomech. 2005; 38: 755-760
        • Ludewig P.M.
        • Reynolds J.F.
        The association of scapular kinematics and glenohumeral joint pathologies.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009; 39: 90-104
        • McClure P.W.
        • Michener L.A.
        • Karduna A.R.
        Shoulder function and 3-dimensional scapular kinematics in people with and without shoulder impingement syndrome.
        Phys Ther. 2006; 86: 1075-1090
        • Mell A.G.
        • LaScalza S.
        • Guffey P.
        • et al.
        Effect of rotator cuff pathology on shoulder rhythm.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14: 58S-64S
        • Scibek J.S.
        • Mell A.G.
        • Downie B.K.
        • Carpenter J.E.
        • Hughes R.E.
        Shoulder kinematics in patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears after subacromial injection.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17: 1272-1281
        • Kibler W.B.
        • Ludewig P.M.
        • McClure P.W.
        • Michener L.A.
        • Bak K.
        • Sciascia A.D.
        Clinical implications of scapular dyskinesis in shoulder injury: The 2013 consensus statement from the ‘Scapular Summit.’.
        Br J Sports Med. 2013; 47: 877-885
        • Spiegl U.J.
        • Smith S.D.
        • Euler S.A.
        • Dornan G.J.
        • Millett P.J.
        • Wijdicks C.A.
        Biomechanical consequences of coracoclavicular reconstruction techniques on clavicle strength.
        Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 1724-1730
        • Dumont G.D.
        • Russel R.D.
        • Knight J.R.
        • et al.
        Impact of tunnels and tenodesis screws on clavicle fracture: A biomechanical study of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction techniques.
        Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 1604-1607
        • Geaney L.E.
        • Beitzel K.
        • Chowaniec D.M.
        • et al.
        Graft fixation is highest with anatomic tunnel positioning in acromioclavicular reconstruction.
        Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 434-439
        • Rylander L.S.
        • Baldini T.
        • Mitchell J.J.
        • Messina M.
        • Justl Ellis I.A.
        • McCarty E.C.
        Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: Coracoid tunnel diameter correlates with failure risk.
        Orthopedics. 2014; 37: e531-e535
        • Ferreira J.V.
        • Chowaniec D.
        • Obopilwe E.
        • Nowak M.D.
        • Arciero R.A.
        • Mazzocca A.D.
        Biomechanical evaluation of effect of coracoid tunnel placement on load to failure of fixation during repair of acromioclavicular joint dislocations.
        Arthroscopy. 2012; 28: 1230-1236
        • Warth R.J.
        • Martetschläger F.
        • Gaskill T.R.
        • Millett P.J.
        Acromioclavicular joint separations.
        Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2013; 6: 71-78
        • Warth R.J.
        • Lee J.T.
        • Millett P.J.
        Arthroscopically-assisted anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with tendon graft: Biomechanical rationale, surgical technique and a review of clinical outcomes.
        Oper Tech Sports Med. 2014; 22: 234-247