Systematic Review| Volume 31, ISSUE 10, P2047-2055, October 2015

Revision Hip Arthroscopy Indications and Outcomes: A Systematic Review


      To identify the indications and outcomes in patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy.


      The electronic databases Embase, Medline, HealthStar, and PubMed were searched from 1946 to July 19, 2014. Two blinded reviewers searched, screened, and evaluated the data quality of the studies using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies scale. Data were abstracted in duplicate. Agreement and descriptive statistics are presented.


      Six studies were included (3 prospective case series and 3 retrospective chart reviews), with a total of 448 hips examined. The most common indications for revision hip arthroscopy included residual femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), labral tears, and chondral lesions. The mean interval between revision arthroscopy and the index procedure was 25.6 months. Overall, the modified Harris Hip Score improved by a mean of 33.6% (19.3 points) from the baseline score at 1-year follow-up. In 14.6% of patients, further surgical procedures were required, including re-revision hip arthroscopy (8.0%), total hip replacement (5.6%), and hip resurfacing (1.0%). Female patients more commonly underwent revision hip arthroscopy (59.7%).


      The current evidence examined in this review supports revision hip arthroscopy as a successful intervention to improve functional outcomes (modified Harris Hip Score) and relieve pain in patients with residual symptoms after primary FAI surgery, although the outcomes are inferior when compared with a matched cohort of patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAI. The main indication for revision is a candidate who has symptoms due to residual cam- or pincer-type deformity that was either unaddressed or under-resected during the index operation. However, it is important to consider that the studies included in this review are of low-quality evidence. Surgeons should consider incorporating a minimum 2-year follow-up for individuals after index hip-preservation surgery because revisions tended to occur within this time frame.

      Level of Evidence

      Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Byrd J.W.
        • Jones K.S.
        Adhesive capsulitis of the hip.
        Arthroscopy. 2006; 22: 89-94
        • McCarthy J.C.
        • Lee J.
        Hip arthroscopy: Indications and technical pearls.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 441: 180-187
        • McCarthy J.C.
        • Lee J.A.
        Arthroscopic intervention in early hip disease.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 429: 157-162
        • Shindle M.K.
        • Ranawat A.S.
        • Kelly B.T.
        Diagnosis and management of traumatic and atraumatic hip instability in the athletic patient.
        Clin Sports Med. 2006; 25 (ix-x): 309-326
        • Kelly B.T.
        • Williams III, R.J.
        • Philippon M.J.
        Hip arthroscopy: Current indications, treatment options, and management issues.
        Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31: 1020-1037
        • Kelly B.T.
        • Weiland D.E.
        • Schenker M.L.
        • Philippon M.J.
        Arthroscopic labral repair in the hip: Surgical technique and review of the literature.
        Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 1496-1504
        • Enseki K.R.
        • Martin R.L.
        • Draovitch P.
        • Kelly B.T.
        • Philippon M.J.
        • Schenker M.L.
        The hip joint: Arthroscopic procedures and postoperative rehabilitation.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36: 516-525
        • Ganz R.
        • Parvizi J.
        • Beck M.
        • Leunig M.
        • Notzli H.
        • Siebenrock K.A.
        Femoroacetabular impingement: A cause for osteoarthritis of the hip.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 417: 112-120
        • Wenger D.E.
        • Kendell K.R.
        • Miner M.R.
        • Trousdale R.T.
        Acetabular labral tears rarely occur in the absence of bony abnormalities.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; 426: 145-150
        • Byrd J.W.
        Hip arthroscopy utilizing the supine position.
        Arthroscopy. 1994; 10: 275-280
        • Byrd J.W.
        • Jones K.S.
        Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 2-year follow-up.
        Arthroscopy. 2000; 16: 578-587
        • Farjo L.A.
        • Glick J.M.
        • Sampson T.G.
        Hip arthroscopy for acetabular labral tears.
        Arthroscopy. 1999; 15: 132-137
        • O’Leary J.A.
        • Berend K.
        • Vail T.P.
        The relationship between diagnosis and outcome in arthroscopy of the hip.
        Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 181-188
        • Potter B.K.
        • Freedman B.A.
        • Andersen R.C.
        • Bojescul J.A.
        • Kuklo T.R.
        • Murphy K.P.
        Correlation of Short Form-36 and disability status with outcomes of arthroscopic acetabular labral debridement.
        Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33: 864-870
        • Santori N.
        • Villar R.N.
        Acetabular labral tears: Result of arthroscopic partial limbectomy.
        Arthroscopy. 2000; 16: 11-15
        • Sampson T.G.
        Complications of hip arthroscopy.
        Clin Sports Med. 2001; 20: 831-835
        • Griffin D.R.
        • Villar R.N.
        Complications of arthroscopy of the hip.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999; 81: 604-606
        • Ward J.P.
        • Rogers P.
        • Youm T.
        Failed hip arthroscopy: Causes and treatment options.
        Orthopedics. 2012; 35: 612-617
        • Slim K.
        • Nini E.
        • Forestier D.
        • Kwiatkowski F.
        • Panis Y.
        • Chipponi J.
        Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): Development and validation of a new instrument.
        ANZ J Surg. 2003; 73: 712-716
        • McGinn T.
        • Wyer P.C.
        • Newman T.B.
        • et al.
        Tips for learners of evidence-based medicine: 3 measures of observer variability (kappa statistic).
        CMAJ. 2004; 171: 1369-1373
      1. Larson CM, Giveans MR, Bedi A, Samuelson KM, Stone RM. Arthroscopic hip revision surgery for residual FAI: Surgical outcomes. Presented at the International Society for Hip Arthroscopy Annual Meeting, Boston, MA, 2012.

        • Philippon M.J.
        • Schenker M.L.
        • Briggs K.K.
        • Kuppersmith D.A.
        • Maxwell R.B.
        • Stubbs A.J.
        Revision hip arthroscopy.
        Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35: 1918-1921
        • Heyworth B.E.
        • Shindle M.K.
        • Voos J.E.
        • Rudzki J.R.
        • Kelly B.T.
        Radiologic and intraoperative findings in revision hip arthroscopy.
        Arthroscopy. 2007; 23: 1295-1302
        • Domb B.G.
        • Stake C.E.
        • Lindner D.
        • El-Bitar Y.
        • Jackson T.J.
        Revision hip preservation surgery with hip arthroscopy: Clinical outcomes.
        Arthroscopy. 2014; 30: 581-587
        • Larson C.M.
        • Giveans M.R.
        • Samuelson K.M.
        • Stone R.M.
        • Bedi A.
        Arthroscopic hip revision surgery for residual femoroacetabular impingement (FAI): Surgical outcomes compared with a matched cohort after primary arthroscopic FAI correction.
        Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 1785-1790
        • Aprato A.
        • Jayasekera N.
        • Villar R.N.
        Revision hip arthroscopic surgery: Outcome at three years.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 22: 932-937
        • Gwathemy F.W.
        • Byrd J.W.
        • Jones K.
        Revision hip arthroscopy: Findings and outcomes.
        Arthroscopy. 2014; 30 (suppl): e23
        • Harris J.D.
        • McCormick F.M.
        • Abrams G.D.
        • et al.
        Complications and reoperations during and after hip arthroscopy: A systematic review of 92 studies and more than 6,000 patients.
        Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 589-595
        • Philippon M.J.
        • Briggs K.K.
        • Yen Y.-M.
        • Kuppersmith D.A.
        Outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement with associated chondrolabral dysfunction: Minimum two-year follow-up.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91: 16-23
        • Chahal J.
        • Van Thiel G.S.
        • Mather R.C.
        • Lee S.
        • Salata M.J.
        • Nho S.J.
        The minimal clinical important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for the modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score among patients undergoing surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement.
        Orthop J Sports Med. 2014; 2: 20
        • Laborie L.B.
        • Lehmann T.G.
        • Engesaeter I.O.
        • Engesaeter L.B.
        • Rosendahl K.
        Is a positive femoroacetabular impingement test a common finding in healthy young adults?.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471: 2267-2277
        • Hetsroni I.
        • Dela Torre K.
        • Duke G.
        • Lyman S.
        • Kelly B.T.
        Sex differences of hip morphology in young adults with hip pain and labral tears.
        Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 54-63
        • Pfirrmann C.W.
        • Mengiardi B.
        • Dora C.
        • Kalberer F.
        • Zanetti M.
        • Hodler J.
        Cam and pincer femoroacetabular impingement: Characteristic MR arthrographic findings in 50 patients.
        Radiology. 2006; 240: 778-785
        • Nepple J.J.
        • Riggs C.N.
        • Ross J.R.
        • Clohisy J.C.
        Clinical presentation and disease characteristics of femoroacetabular impingement are sex-dependent.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96: 1683-1689
        • McCarthy J.C.
        • Noble P.C.
        • Schuck M.R.
        • Wright J.
        • Lee J.
        The watershed labral lesion: Its relationship to early arthritis of the hip.
        J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16 (suppl 1): 81-87
        • Gupta A.
        • Redmond J.M.
        • Stake C.E.
        • Finch N.A.
        • Dunne K.F.
        • Domb B.G.
        Does the femoral cam lesion regrow after osteoplasty for femoroacetabular impingement? Two-year follow-up.
        Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 2149-2155
        • Sawalha S.
        • Dixon S.
        • Norton M.
        • Fern E.
        Recurrence of femoral head-neck osseous ‘bumps’ after hip impingement surgery.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93 (abstr, suppl I): 48
        • Zaltz I.
        • Kelly B.T.
        • Larson C.M.
        • Leunig M.
        • Bedi A.
        Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: What are the limits of hip arthroscopy?.
        Arthroscopy. 2014; 30: 99-110
        • Bedi A.
        • Zaltz I.
        • De La Torre K.
        • Kelly B.T.
        Radiographic comparison of surgical hip dislocation and hip arthroscopy for treatment of cam deformity in femoroacetabular impingement.
        Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39 (suppl): 20S-28S
        • Matsuda D.K.
        • Schnieder C.P.
        • Sehgal B.
        The critical corner of cam femoroacetabular impingement: Clinical support of an emerging concept.
        Arthroscopy. 2014; 30: 575-580
        • Matsuda D.K.
        • Gupta N.
        • Hanami D.
        Hip arthroscopy for challenging deformities: Global pincer femoroacetabular impingement.
        Arthrosc Tech. 2014; 3: e197-e204
        • Thoma A.
        • Farrokhyar F.
        • McKnight L.
        • Bhandari M.
        Practical tips for surgical research: How to optimize patient recruitment.
        Can J Surg. 2010; 53: 205-210
        • Hoppe D.J.
        • de Sa D.
        • Simunovic N.
        • et al.
        The learning curve for hip arthroscopy: A systematic review.
        Arthroscopy. 2014; 30: 389-397
        • Aprato A.
        • Jayasekera N.
        • Villar R.
        Timing in hip arthroscopy: Does surgical timing change clinical results?.
        Int Orthop. 2012; 36: 2231-2234
      2. Claßen T, Körsmeier K, Kamminga M, et al. Is early treatment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement the key to avoiding associated full thickness isolated chondral defects? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc in press, available online 4 October, 2014. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3332-7.

        • de Sa D.
        • Alradwan H.
        • Cargnelli S.
        • et al.
        Extra-articular hip impingement: A systematic review examining operative treatment of psoas, subspine, ischiofemoral, and greater trochanteric/pelvic impingement.
        Arthroscopy. 2014; 30: 1026-1041
        • Larson C.M.
        • Kelly B.T.
        • Stone R.M.
        Making a case for anterior inferior iliac spine/subspine hip impingement: Three representative case reports and proposed concept.
        Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 1732-1737
        • Siebenrock K.A.
        • Steppacher S.D.
        • Haefeli P.C.
        • Schwab J.M.
        • Tannast M.
        Valgus hip with high antetorsion causes pain through posterior extraarticular FAI.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471: 3774-3780
        • Hetaimish B.M.
        • Khan M.
        • Crouch S.
        • et al.
        Consistency of reported outcomes after arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement.
        Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 780-787