Purpose
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Level of Evidence
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to ArthroscopyReferences
- Clinical diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament instability in the athlete.Am J Sports Med. 1976; 4: 84-93
- The lateral pivot shift: A symptom and sign of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980; : 45-50
- Physical examination in the diagnosis of rotatory instability.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983; : 38-44
- Physical examination of the knee: A review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84: 592-603
- Predictive factors for 12-month outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009; 19: 842-849
- Knee laxity in cruciate ligament injury. Value of examination under anesthesia.Acta Orthop Scand. 1989; 60: 181-184
- Clinical diagnosis of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament: A comparative study of the Lachman test and the anterior drawer sign.Am J Sports Med. 1982; 10: 100-102
- Clinical diagnosis of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament: A comparison between the Lachman test and the anterior drawer sign.Injury. 1988; 19: 427-428
- The diagnostic accuracy of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament comparing the Lachman test, the anterior drawer sign, and the pivot shift test in acute and chronic knee injuries.Am J Sports Med. 1986; 14: 88-91
- Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: A meta-analysis.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2006; 36: 267-288
- The effect of medial versus lateral meniscectomy on the stability of the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee.Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38: 1591-1597
- The influence of bony morphology on the magnitude of the pivot shift.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18: 1232-1238
- A comparison of acute anterior cruciate ligament examinations. Initial versus examination under anesthesia.Am J Sports Med. 1985; 13: 5-10
- ACL reconstruction: Do outcomes differ by sex? A systematic review.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96: 507-512
- Does the Lachman testing method affect the reliability of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Form?.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004; 12: 225-228
- The reliability of physical examination tests for the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture—A systematic review.Man Ther. 2015; 20: 402-411
- Reliability of the KT1000 arthrometer and the Lachman test in patients with an ACL rupture.Knee. 2008; 15: 107-110
- Accuracy and reliability of anterior cruciate ligament clinical examination in a multidisciplinary sports medicine setting.Clin J Sport Med. 2010; 20: 80-85
- Physical status: The use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. Technical Report Series 854.World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland1995
- What does it take to have a high-grade pivot shift?.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20: 737-742
- Do pre-operative knee laxity values influence post-operative ones after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?.Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2013; 23: e219-e224
- Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84: 1560-1572
- Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32: 629-634
- Reliability of the anterior drawer test, the pivot shift test, and the Lachman test.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; : 237-242
- Effect of external extra-articular ligament plasty on the results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon, a 4 years follow-up.Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1997; 83 ([in French]): 591-601
- Articular mobility in an African population.Ann Rheum Dis. 1973; 32: 413-418
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
The authors report the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: R.A.M. receives support from National Institutes of Health (NIH)–National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), Orthopaedic Research and Education Foundation (OREF), and Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. E.K.R. receives support from NIH/NIAMS (5R01 AR053684 and 5R01 AR055557), NFL Charities, OREF, DonJoy, Smith & Nephew, and Aircast. L.J.H. receives support from NIH/NIAMS (5R01 AR060846), NFL Charities, OREF, DonJoy, Smith & Nephew, and Aircast. K.P.S. receives support from NIH. A.F.V. receives support from Ceterix, Stryker, ArthroCare, and Smith & Nephew. R.G.M. receives support from The ACL Solution (Desmos Health, 2012), ACL Revision (Springer, 2014), Sports Medicine, and Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. A.A. receives support from Arthrex, NIH, Department of Defense, Arthrosurface, and MTP Solutions. B.R.W. receives support from United Health Care, ConMed, OREF, and Arthrex. D.C.F. receives support from Smith & Nephew, Vericel, DePuy Mitek, NFL Charities, and Arthroscopy Association of North America. M.J.M. receives support from Ostesys, Arthrex, Breg, and Schwartz Biomedical. R.W.W. receives support from Board of Directors, American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery; Board of Directors, American Orthopaedic Association; Board of Directors, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine; NIH; NIAMS; and Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.