Advertisement

Validation of Improvement of Basic Competency in Arthroscopic Knot Tying Using a Bench Top Simulator in Orthopaedic Residency Education

      Purpose

      To validate basic competency in arthroscopic knot tying using a unique simulator device to compare the level of training needed for learning and tying the arthroscopic knot by evaluating the tensile properties of the arthroscopic knots.

      Methods

      Three groups of surgeons of various experience levels (postgraduate year [PGY] 1, PGY 3, and experienced surgeons) tied 2 different arthroscopic knots (Tennessee Slider, considered easier, and Weston, considered more difficult) over a 10-week period. Each group went through 3 separate stages of knot tying: stage 1, tying 8 knots without cannula or knot pusher; stage 2, tying 12 knots with knot pusher; and stage 3, tying 20 knots with knot pusher through a cannula that simulates knot tying during surgery. A single load-to-failure test was performed and ultimate clinical failure loads were recorded. Time needed to tie each knot was also recorded.

      Results

      At stages 1 and 2, the PGY 1 group had a significantly weak knot tensile strength (Tennessee Slider stage 1: 60 v 129 N, P = .001; Tennessee Slider stage 2: 69 v 132 N, P = .0029; Weston stage 1: 73 v 184 N, P = .0000; Weston stage 2: 125 v 173 N, P = .0045) and were slower (Weston: 56 v 30 seconds, P = .0010) than the experienced surgeon group for both knots. At stage 3, only the initial 2 weeks of Tennessee Slider showed a significant difference between groups 1 and 3 (week 6: 87 v 118 N, P = .0492; week 7: 89 v 126, P = .01485). Even though the Tennessee Slider knot is one of the easier arthroscopic knots to learn to tie, the results showed a slow trend of improvement in this knot-tying skill for group 1 after each stage.

      Conclusions

      The data validated an important learning effect in all trainees in arthroscopic knot tying over a 10-week period and showed that inexperienced trainees will be able to improve their knot-tying skill with training in 3 stages with a simulator environment.

      Clinical Relevance

      The findings of this study indicated the importance of hands-on experience in performing arthroscopic knot tying, as determined by both knot performance and ultimate suture loop strength. In addition, each orthopaedic resident learned and developed his or her arthroscopic knot-tying skills and provided a foundation for his or her future practice in orthopaedic medicine.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and PersonalCorporate R&D Professionals
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Baumgarten K.M.
        • Wright R.W.
        Ease of tying arthroscopic knots.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16: 438-442
        • Kim S.H.
        • Ha K.I.
        • Kim S.H.
        • Kim J.S.
        Significance of the internal locking mechanism for loop security enhancement in the arthroscopic knot.
        Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 850-855
        • Leedle B.P.
        • Miller M.D.
        Pullout strength of knotless suture anchors.
        Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 81-85
        • Mishra D.K.
        • Cannon Jr., W.D.
        • Lucas D.J.
        • Belzer J.P.
        Elongation of arthroscopically tied knots.
        Am J Sports Med. 1997; 25: 113-117
        • Tidwell J.E.
        • Kish V.L.
        • Samora J.B.
        • Prud'homme J.
        Knot security: How many throws does it really take?.
        Orthopedics. 2012; 35: e532-e537
        • Lafosse L.
        • Brozska R.
        • Toussaint B.
        • Gobezie R.
        The outcome and structural integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with use of the double-row suture anchor technique.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 1533-1541
        • Huijsmans P.E.
        • Pritchard M.P.
        • Berghs B.M.
        • van Rooyen K.S.
        • Wallace A.L.
        • de Beer J.F.
        Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with double row fixation.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 1248-1257
        • Sugaya H.
        • Maeda K.
        • Matsuki K.
        • Moriishi J.
        Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. A prospective outcome study.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 953-960
        • Galatz L.M.
        • Ball C.M.
        • Teefey S.A.
        • Middelton W.D.
        • Yamaguchi K.
        The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86: 219-224
        • Wilson F.
        • Hinov V.
        • Adams G.
        Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: 2- to 14-year follow-up.
        Arthroscopy. 2002; 18: 136-144
        • Hanypsiak B.T.
        • DeLong J.M.
        • Simmons L.
        • Lowe W.
        • Burkhart S.
        Knot strength varies widely among expert arthroscopists.
        Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 1978-1984
        • Angelo R.L.
        • Ryu R.K.
        • Pedowitz R.A.
        • Gallagher A.G.
        Metric development for an arthroscopic bankart procedure: Assessment of face and content validity.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 1430-1440
        • Angelo R.L.
        • Pedowitz R.A.
        • Ryu R.K.
        • Gallagher A.G.
        The Bankart performance metrics combined with a shoulder model simulator create a precise and accurate training tool for measuring surgeon skill.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 1639-1654
        • Angelo R.L.
        • Ryu R.K.
        • Pedowitz R.A.
        • et al.
        A proficiency-based progression training curriculum coupled with a model simulator results in the acquisition of a superior arthroscopic Bankart skill set.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 1854-1871
        • Angelo R.L.
        Magellan and Copernicus: Arthroscopy Association of North America seeking excellence in education.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 1428-1429
        • Gallagher A.G.
        • Ritter E.M.
        • Champion H.
        • et al.
        Virtual reality simulation for the operating room: Proficiency-based training as a paradigm shift in surgical skills training.
        Ann Surg. 2005; 241: 364-372
        • Pedowitz R.A.
        • Nicandri G.T.
        • Angelo R.L.
        • Ryu R.K.
        • Gallagher A.G.
        Objective assessment of knot-tying proficiency with the fundamentals of arthroscopic surgery training program workstation and knot tester.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 1872-1879
        • Nottage W.M.
        • Lieurance R.K.
        Arthroscopic knot typing techniques.
        Arthroscopy. 1999; 15: 515-521
        • Lieurance R.K.
        • Pflaster D.S.
        • Abbott D.
        • Nottage W.M.
        Failure characteristics of various arthroscopically tied knots.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 408: 311-318
        • Lee T.Q.
        • Matsuura P.A.
        • Fogolin R.P.
        • Lin A.C.
        • Kim D.
        • McMahon P.J.
        Arthroscopic suture tying: A comparison of knot types and suture materials.
        Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 348-352
        • Kim S.H.
        • Ha K.I.
        The SMC knot—A new slip knot with locking mechanism.
        Arthroscopy. 2000; 16: 563-565
        • De Beer J.F.
        • van Rooyen K.
        • Boezaart A.P.
        Nicky's knot—A new slip knot for arthroscopic surgery.
        Arthroscopy. 1998; 14: 109-110
        • Field M.H.
        • Edwards T.B.
        • Savoie 3rd, F.H.
        Technical note: A “new” arthroscopic sliding knot.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 2001; 32: 525-526
        • Fleega B.A.
        • Sokkar S.H.
        The giant knot: A new one-way self-locking secured arthroscopic slip knot.
        Arthroscopy. 1999; 15: 451-452
        • Rolla P.R.
        • Surace M.F.
        The double-twist knot: A new arthroscopic sliding knot.
        Arthroscopy. 2002; 18: 815-820
        • Abbi G.
        • Espinoza L.
        • Odell T.
        • Mahar A.
        • Pedowitz R.
        Evaluation of 5 knots and 2 suture materials for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Very strong sutures can still slip.
        Arthroscopy. 2006; 22: 38-43
        • Dines J.S.
        • Moynihan D.
        • Uggen C.
        • Dines D.M.
        The DMD knot: A new locking, flip knot.
        J Surg Orthop Adv. 2008; 17: 115-118
        • Clark R.R.
        • Dierckman B.
        • Sampatacos N.
        • Snyder S.
        Biomechanical performance of traditional arthroscopic knots versus slippage-proof knots.
        Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 1175-1181
        • Jo C.H.
        • Yoon K.S.
        • Lee J.H.
        • Kang S.B.
        • Lee M.C.
        The slippage-proof knot: A new, nonstacking, arthroscopic, sliding locking knot with a lag bight.
        Orthopedics. 2007; 30: 349-350
        • Weston P.V.
        A new clinch knot.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1991; 78: 144-147
        • Farnworth L.R.
        • Lemay D.E.
        • Wooldridge T.
        • et al.
        A comparison of operative times in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction between orthopaedic faculty and residents: The financial impact of orthopaedic surgical training in the operating room.
        Iowa Orthop J. 2001; 21: 31-35
        • Bridges M.
        • Diamond D.L.
        The financial impact of teaching surgical residents in the operating room.
        Am J Surg. 1999; 177: 28-32
        • Torbeck L.
        • Williams R.G.
        • Choi J.
        • Schmitz C.C.
        • Chipman J.G.
        • Dunnington G.L.
        How much guidance is given in the operating room? Factors influencing faculty self-reports, resident perceptions, and faculty/resident agreement.
        Surgery. 2014; 156: 797-803
        • Snyder R.A.
        • Tarpley M.J.
        • Tarpley J.L.
        • Davidson M.
        • Brophy C.
        • Dattilo J.B.
        Teaching in the operating room: Results of a national survey.
        J Surg Educ. 2012; 69: 643-649
        • Nousiainen M.T.
        • McQueen S.A.
        • Ferguson P.
        • et al.
        Simulation for teaching orthopaedic residents in a competency-based curriculum: Do the benefits justify the increased costs?.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. September 3, 2015; ([Epub ahead of print])
        • Martin K.D.
        • Cameron K.
        • Belmont P.J.
        • Schoenfeld A.
        • Owens B.D.
        Shoulder arthroscopy simulator performance correlates with resident and shoulder arthroscopy experience.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94: e160
        • Martin K.D.
        • Belmont P.J.
        • Schoenfeld A.J.
        • Todd M.
        • Cameron K.L.
        • Owens B.D.
        Arthroscopic basic task performance in shoulder simulator model correlates with similar task performance in cadavers.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93: e1271-e1275
        • Gomoll A.H.
        • Pappas G.
        • Forsythe B.
        • Warner J.J.
        Individual skill progression on a virtual reality simulator for shoulder arthroscopy: A 3-year follow-up study.
        Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36: 1139-1142
        • Michelson J.D.
        Simulation in orthopaedic education: An overview of theory and practice.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 1405-1411
        • Lo I.K.
        • Burkhart S.S.
        • Chan K.C.
        • Athanasiou K.
        Arthroscopic knots: Determining the optimal balance of loop security and knot security.
        Arthroscopy. 2004; 20: 489-502
        • Armstrong L.C.
        • Chong A.
        • Livermore R.W.
        • Prohaska D.J.
        • Doyon A.N.
        • Wooley P.H.
        In vitro and in situ characterization of arthroscopic loop security and knot security of braided polyblend sutures: A biomechanical study.
        Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015; 44: 176-182
        • Livermore R.W.
        • Chong A.C.
        • Prohaska D.J.
        • Cooke F.W.
        • Jones T.L.
        Knot security, loop security, and elongation of braided polyblend sutures used for arthroscopic knots.
        Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2010; 39: 569-576
        • Kim S.H.
        • Glaser D.
        • Doan J.
        • et al.
        Loop securities of arthroscopic sliding-knot techniques when the suture loop is not evenly tensioned.
        Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 1380-1386
        • Loutzenheiser T.D.
        • Harryman 2nd, D.T.
        • Yung S.W.
        • France M.P.
        • Sidles J.A.
        Optimizing arthroscopic knots.
        Arthroscopy. 1995; 11: 199-206
        • Richmond J.C.
        A comparison of ultrasonic suture welding and traditional knot tying.
        Am J Sports Med. 2001; 29: 297-299
        • James J.D.
        • Wu M.M.
        • Batra E.K.
        • Rodeheaver G.T.
        • Edlich R.F.
        Technical considerations in manual and instrument tying techniques.
        J Emerg Med. 1992; 10: 469-480
        • Batra E.K.
        • Franz D.A.
        • Towler M.A.
        • et al.
        Influence of emergency physician's tying technique on knot security.
        J Emerg Med. 1992; 10: 309-316
        • Loutzenheiser T.D.
        • Harryman 2nd, D.T.
        • Ziegler D.W.
        • Yung S.W.
        Optimizing arthroscopic knots using braided or monofilament suture.
        Arthroscopy. 1998; 14: 57-65
        • Chan K.C.
        • Burkhart S.S.
        • Thiagarajan P.
        • Goh J.C.
        Optimization of stacked half-hitch knots for arthroscopic surgery.
        Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 752-759
        • Kim S.H.
        • Yoo J.C.
        • Wang J.H.
        • Choi K.W.
        • Bae T.S.
        • Lee C.Y.
        Arthroscopic sliding knot: How many additional half-hitches are really needed?.
        Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 405-411
        • Burkhart S.S.
        • Wirth M.A.
        • Simonich M.
        • Salem D.
        • Lanctot D.
        • Athanasiou K.
        Knot security in simple sliding knots and its relationship to rotator cuff repair: How secure must the knot be?.
        Arthroscopy. 2000; 16: 202-207
        • Ilahi O.A.
        • Younas S.A.
        • Alexander J.
        • Noble P.C.
        Cyclic testing of arthroscopic knot security.
        Arthroscopy. 2004; 20: 62-68
        • Burkhart S.S.
        • Wirth M.A.
        • Simonich M.
        • Salem D.
        • Lanctot D.
        • Athanasiou K.
        Loop security as a determinant of tissue fixation security.
        Arthroscopy. 1998; 14: 773-776
        • Jo C.H.
        • Lee J.H.
        • Kang S.B.
        • et al.
        Optimal configuration of arthroscopic sliding knots backed up with multiple half-hitches.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008; 16: 787-793
        • Kelly 2nd, J.D.
        • Vaishnav S.
        • Saunders B.M.
        • Schrumpf M.A.
        Optimization of the racking hitch knot: How many half hitches and which suture material provide the greatest security?.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 1930-1935
        • Chan K.C.
        • Burkhart S.S.
        How to switch posts without rethreading when tying half-hitches.
        Arthroscopy. 1999; 15: 444-450
        • Meier J.D.
        • Meier S.W.
        Over-pointing technique: An approach to past-pointing arthroscopic knots on alternating suture posts without alternating the knot pusher.
        Arthroscopy. 2007; 23: 1358.e1-1358.e13