Repair of Meniscal Ramp Lesions Through a Posteromedial Portal During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Outcome Study With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up


      To evaluate the results of arthroscopic all-inside suture repair of medial meniscal ramp lesions through a posteromedial portal during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.


      All patients who underwent a suture of the posterior segment of the medial meniscus using a suture hook device through a posteromedial portal during ACL reconstruction with minimum 2 year-follow-up were included in the study. Repair was performed for longitudinal tears within the rim of less than 3 mm (capsulomeniscal junction or red-red zone) or 3 to 5 mm (red-white zone) of an unstable torn meniscus. Patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively with IKDC score and Tegner activity scale. Instrumented knee testing was performed with the Rolimeter arthrometer. Complications including reoperation for failed meniscal repair were also recorded.


      One hundred thirty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up time was 27 months (range, 24 to 29 months). The average subjective IKDC rose from 63.8 ± 13.5 (range, 27 to 92) preoperatively to 85.7 ± 12 (range, 43 to 100) at last follow-up (P < .0001). The Rolimeter test decreased from a side-to-side difference in anterior knee laxity of 7 mm (range, 5 to 14 mm) to a mean value of 0.4 mm (range, −3 to 5 mm) at last follow-up (P < .0001). The Tegner activity scale at the last follow-up (6.9 ± 1.72) was slightly lower than that before surgery (7.2 ± 1.92; P = .0017). Nine patients (6.8%) had failure of the meniscal repair. In 5 cases, recurrent tears were related to a newly formed tear located anterior to the initial tear.


      Our results show that arthroscopic meniscal repair of ramp lesions during ACL reconstruction through a posteromedial portal provided a high rate of meniscus healing at the level of the tear and appeared to be safe and effective in this group of patients.

      Level of Evidence

      Level IV, therapeutic study, case series (no control group).
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Ahldén M.
        • Samuelsson K.
        • Sernert N.
        • Forssblad M.
        • Karlsson J.
        • Kartus J.
        The Swedish National Anterior Cruciate Ligament Register: a report on baseline variables and outcomes of surgery for almost 18,000 patients.
        Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40: 2230-2235
        • Granan L.-P.
        • Inacio M.C.S.
        • Maletis G.B.
        • Funahashi T.T.
        • Engebretsen L.
        Intraoperative findings and procedures in culturally and geographically different patient and surgeon populations: an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction registry comparison between Norway and the USA.
        Acta Orthop. 2012; 83: 577-582
        • Noyes F.R.
        • Chen R.C.
        • Barber-Westin S.D.
        • Potter H.G.
        Greater than 10-year results of red-white longitudinal meniscal repairs in patients 20 years of age or younger.
        Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 1008-1017
        • Strobel M.
        in: Fett H.M. Flechtner P. Manual of Arthroscopic Surgery. Springer, New York1988: 171-178
        • Seil R.
        • VanGiffen N.
        • Pape D.
        Thirty years of arthroscopic meniscal suture: What's left to be done?.
        Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009; 95: S85-S96
        • Liu X.
        • Feng H.
        • Zhang H.
        • Hong L.
        • Wang X.S.
        • Zhang J.
        Arthroscopic prevalence of ramp lesion in 868 patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury.
        Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 832-837
        • Kotsovolos E.S.
        • Hantes M.E.
        • Mastrokalos D.S.
        • Lorbach O.
        • Paessler H.H.
        Results of all-inside meniscal repair with the FasT-Fix meniscal repair system.
        J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2006; 22: 3-9
        • Sonnery-Cottet B.
        • Mortati R.
        • Gadea F.
        • Thaunat M.
        • Moyere F.
        • Chouteau J.
        Osteolysis of the tibial plateau after meniscal repair with hybrid suture anchor.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 21: 2137-2140
        • Aşík M.
        • Sener N.
        Failure strength of repair devices versus meniscus suturing techniques.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2002; 10: 25-29
        • Morgan C.D.
        The “all-inside” meniscus repair.
        J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 1991; 7: 120-125
        • Sonnery-Cottet B.
        • Conteduca J.
        • Thaunat M.
        • Gunepin F.X.
        • Seil R.
        Hidden lesions of the posterior horn of the medial meniscus: a systematic arthroscopic exploration of the concealed portion of the knee.
        Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 921-926
        • Barrett G.R.
        • Field M.H.
        • Treacy S.H.
        • Ruff C.G.
        Clinical results of meniscus repair in patients 40 years and older.
        Arthroscopy. 1998; 14: 824-829
        • Irrgang J.J.
        • Anderson A.F.
        • Boland A.L.
        • et al.
        Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form.
        Am J Sports Med. 2001; 29: 600-613
        • Ellermann A.
        • Siebold R.
        • Buelow J.U.
        • Sobau C.
        Clinical evaluation of meniscus repair with a bioabsorbable arrow: a 2- to 3-year follow-up study.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2002; 10: 289-293
        • Walgrave S.
        • Claes S.
        • Bellemans J.
        High incidence of intraoperative anchorage failure in FasT-fix all inside meniscal suturing device.
        Acta Orthop Belg. 2013; 79: 689-693
        • Calder S.J.
        • Myers P.T.
        Broken arrow: a complication of meniscal repair.
        J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 1999; 15: 651-652
        • Peltier A.
        • Lording T.D.
        • Lustig S.
        • Servien E.
        • Maubisson L.
        • Neyret P.
        Posteromedial meniscal tears may be missed during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 691-698
        • Ahn J.H.
        • Wang J.H.
        • Yoo J.C.
        Arthroscopic all-inside suture repair of medial meniscus lesion in anterior cruciate ligament—deficient knees: results of second-look arthroscopies in 39 cases.
        J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2004; 20: 936-945
        • Ahn J.H.
        • Lee Y.S.
        • Yoo J.C.
        • Chang M.J.
        • Koh K.H.
        • Kim M.H.
        Clinical and second-look arthroscopic evaluation of repaired medial meniscus in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees.
        Am J Sports Med. 2010; 38: 472-477
        • Seil R.
        • Rupp S.
        • Jurecka C.
        • Rein R.
        • Kohn D.
        Effect of various suture strength factors on behavior of meniscus sutures in cyclic loading conditions.
        Unfallchirurg. 2001; 104: 392-398
        • Pujol N.
        • Barbier O.
        • Boisrenoult P.
        • Beaufils P.
        Amount of meniscal resection after failed meniscal repair.
        Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 1648-1652
        • Yiannakopoulos C.K.
        Diagnosis and treatment of postarthroscopic synovial knee fistulae: a report of four cases and review of the literature.
        J Knee Surg. 2007; 20: 34-38
        • Ogilvie-Harris D.J.
        • Weisleder L.
        Arthroscopic synovectomy of the knee: is it helpful?.
        J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 1995; 11: 91-95