Advertisement

Comparative Influence of Sport Type on Outcome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Published:October 20, 2016DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2016.08.012

      Purpose

      To investigate differences between sport types for patient-reported outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

      Methods

      Included patients were enrolled as part of a prospective institutional ACL registry. Inclusion criteria were preoperative self-identification as a competitive athlete, maximum score on the preoperative Marx Activity Scale, and minimum 2-year follow-up. Demographic, intraoperative, and outcome data were extracted from the registry. Outcome tools administered as part of the registry included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Lysholm-Tegner Scales, Marx Activity Scale (MAS), and 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12).

      Results

      A total of 294 patients with a mean age of 25.5 years (standard deviation 12.1) met the study inclusion criteria; mean follow-up was 3.7 years. Included sports categories were soccer (n = 92; 31.3%), skiing (n = 67; 22.8%), basketball (n = 56; 19.1%), lacrosse (n = 38; 12.9%), football (n = 29; 9.9%), and Tennis (n = 12; 4.1%). At baseline, compared with other sports, lacrosse players have higher outcome scores while skiers had lower scores. At 2-year follow-up, however, across all outcome tools, football players demonstrated significantly higher outcome scores than all other athletes (IKDC, 93.2, P = .001; Lysholm, 93.2, P = .03; MAS, 13.1, P = .03; SF-12 Mental Component Summary, 57.9, P = .0002). Conversely, at 2-year follow-up, soccer players demonstrated a significantly lower Lysholm (86.7, P = .02) and a trend toward lower IKDC (85.6, P = .09) scores.

      Conclusions

      Patient-reported outcomes after ACLR among active athletes are comparable. Football players demonstrate quantitatively higher outcome scores whereas soccer players have lower scores. However, these outcome score differences may not be clinically significant and may be subject to confounding variables. Continued attention should be paid to understanding sport-specific outcome after ACLR.

      Level of Evidence

      Level IV, therapeutic case series.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mall N.A.
        • Chalmers P.N.
        • Moric M.
        • et al.
        Incidence and trends of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States.
        Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 2363-2370
        • Leathers M.P.
        • Merz A.
        • Wong J.
        • Scott T.
        • Wang J.C.
        • Hame S.L.
        Trends and demographics in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States.
        J Knee Surg. 2015; 28: 390-394
        • Buller L.T.
        • Best M.J.
        • Baraga M.G.
        • Kaplan L.D.
        Trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the United States.
        Orthop J Sports Med. 2015; 3 (2325967114563664)
        • Sanders T.L.
        • Maradit Kremers H.
        • Bryan A.J.
        • et al.
        Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: A 21-year population-based study.
        Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 1502-1507
        • Csintalan R.P.
        • Inacio M.C.
        • Funahashi T.T.
        Incidence rate of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions.
        Perm J. 2008; 12: 17-21
        • Joseph A.M.
        • Collins C.L.
        • Henke N.M.
        • Yard E.E.
        • Fields S.K.
        • Comstock R.D.
        A multisport epidemiologic comparison of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in high school athletics.
        J Athl Train. 2013; 48: 810-817
        • Prodromos C.C.
        • Han Y.
        • Rogowski J.
        • Joyce B.
        • Shi K.
        A meta-analysis of the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears as a function of gender, sport, and a knee injury-reduction regimen.
        Arthroscopy. 2007; 23: 1320-1325.e6
        • Warner S.J.
        • Smith M.V.
        • Wright R.W.
        • Matava M.J.
        • Brophy R.H.
        Sport-specific outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 1129-1134
        • Fabricant P.D.
        • Chin C.S.
        • Conte S.
        • Coleman S.H.
        • Pearle A.D.
        • Dines J.S.
        Return to play after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in major league baseball athletes.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 896-900
        • Howard J.S.
        • Lembach M.L.
        • Metzler A.V.
        • Johnson D.L.
        Rates and determinants of return to play after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I soccer athletes: A study of the Southeastern Conference.
        Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 433-439
        • Busfield B.T.
        • Kharrazi F.D.
        • Starkey C.
        • Lombardo S.J.
        • Seegmiller J.
        Performance outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the National Basketball Association.
        Arthroscopy. 2009; 25: 825-830
        • Carey J.L.
        • Huffman G.R.
        • Parekh S.G.
        • Sennett B.J.
        Outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament injuries to running backs and wide receivers in the National Football League.
        Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34: 1911-1917
        • Erickson B.J.
        • Harris J.D.
        • Heninger J.R.
        • et al.
        Performance and return-to-sport after ACL reconstruction in NFL quarterbacks.
        Orthopedics. 2014; 37: e728-e734
        • Harris J.D.
        • Erickson B.J.
        • Bach Jr., B.R.
        • et al.
        Return-to-sport and performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in National Basketball Association players.
        Sports Health. 2013; 5: 562-568
        • Brophy R.H.
        • Schmitz L.
        • Wright R.W.
        • et al.
        Return to play and future ACL injury risk after ACL reconstruction in soccer athletes from the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) group.
        Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40: 2517-2522
        • McCullough K.A.
        • Phelps K.D.
        • Spindler K.P.
        • et al.
        Return to high school- and college-level football after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) cohort study.
        Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40: 2523-2529
        • Grimm N.L.
        • Jacobs Jr., J.C.
        • Kim J.
        • Denney B.S.
        • Shea K.G.
        Anterior cruciate ligament and knee injury prevention programs for soccer players: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 2049-2056
        • Bozic K.J.
        • Belkora J.
        • Chan V.
        • et al.
        Shared decision making in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: Results of a randomized controlled trial.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: 1633-1639
        • Kahlenberg C.A.
        • Nwachukwu B.U.
        • Schairer W.W.
        • McCormick F.
        • Ranawat A.S.
        Patient satisfaction reporting for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.
        Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 1693-1699
        • Erickson B.J.
        • Harris J.D.
        • Cole B.J.
        • et al.
        Performance and return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in National Hockey League players.
        Orthop J Sports Med. 2014; 2 (2325967114548831)
        • von Porat A.
        • Roos E.M.
        • Roos H.
        High prevalence of osteoarthritis 14 years after an anterior cruciate ligament tear in male soccer players: A study of radiographic and patient relevant outcomes.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 2004; 63: 269-273
        • Roos H.
        • Ornell M.
        • Gardsell P.
        • Lohmander L.S.
        • Lindstrand A.
        Soccer after anterior cruciate ligament injury—an incompatible combination? A national survey of incidence and risk factors and a 7-year follow-up of 310 players.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 1995; 66: 107-112
        • Walden M.
        • Hagglund M.
        • Magnusson H.
        • Ekstrand J.
        Anterior cruciate ligament injury in elite football: A prospective three-cohort study.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19: 11-19
        • Harris J.D.
        • Abrams G.D.
        • Bach B.R.
        • et al.
        Return to sport after ACL reconstruction.
        Orthopedics. 2014; 37: e103-e108
        • Berliner J.L.
        • Brodke D.J.
        • Chan V.
        • SooHoo N.F.
        • Bozic K.J.
        John Charnley Award: Preoperative patient-reported outcome measures predict clinically meaningful improvement in function after THA.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016; 474: 321-329
        • Ardern C.L.
        • Osterberg A.
        • Tagesson S.
        • Gauffin H.
        • Webster K.E.
        • Kvist J.
        The impact of psychological readiness to return to sport and recreational activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Br J Sports Med. 2014; 48: 1613-1619
        • Everhart J.S.
        • Best T.M.
        • Flanigan D.C.
        Psychological predictors of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes: A systematic review.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 23: 752-762
        • Thomee P.
        • Wahrborg P.
        • Borjesson M.
        • Thomee R.
        • Eriksson B.I.
        • Karlsson J.
        Self-efficacy of knee function as a pre-operative predictor of outcome 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008; 16: 118-127
        • Katz N.P.
        • Paillard F.C.
        • Ekman E.
        Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions.
        J Orthop Surg Res. 2015; 10: 24
        • Irrgang J.J.
        • Anderson A.F.
        • Boland A.L.
        • et al.
        Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form.
        Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34: 1567-1573
        • Collins N.J.
        • Misra D.
        • Felson D.T.
        • Crossley K.M.
        • Roos E.M.
        Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS).
        Arthritis Care Res. 2011; 63: S208-S228