To provide a comparative 30-day postoperative analysis of complications and unplanned readmission rates, using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, after open or arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR).
The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was reviewed for postoperative complications after open or arthroscopic RCR over an 8-year period, from 2007 through 2014. Patients were identified by use of Current Procedural Terminology codes. The open group contained 3,590 cases (21.8%) and the arthroscopic group had 12,882 cases (78.2%), for a total of 16,472 patients undergoing RCR. The risk of complications was compared between the 2 groups, along with patient demographic characteristics, operative time, length of stay, and unplanned readmission within 30 days. We compared dichotomous variables using the Fisher exact test and continuous variables with 1-way analysis of variance. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated when appropriate.
The open RCR group had a higher prevalence of patients aged 65 years or older and comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, smoking, and alcoholism (P < .05). Patients undergoing open RCR had a higher risk of any adverse event when compared with arthroscopic RCR patients (1.48% vs 0.84%; RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.05-1.30; P = .0010). They were also at higher risk of return to the operating room within 30 days (0.70% vs 0.26%; RR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.09-1.69; P = .0004). Open RCR was associated with a longer average hospital stay (0.48 ± 2.7 days vs 0.23 ± 4.2 days, P = .0007), whereas arthroscopic RCR had a longer average operative time (90 ± 45 minutes vs 79 ± 45 minutes, P < .0001).
Although both open and arthroscopic approaches to RCR had low morbidity, arthroscopy was associated with lower risks of any adverse event and return to the operating room during the initial 30-day postoperative period.
Level of Evidence
Level III, retrospective comparative study.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Arthroscopy
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Shoulder joint movement and its relationship to disability in the elderly.J Rheumatol. 1993; 20: 1359-1361
- Shoulder disorders in the elderly (a hospital study).Ann Rheum Dis. 1987; 46: 684-687
- Shoulder disorders in the elderly: A community survey.Arthritis Rheum. 1991; 34: 766-769
- An epidemiological study of rotator cuff pathology using the Health Improvement Network database.J Bone Joint Br. 2014; 96: 350-353
- Shoulder disorders in general practice: Incidence, patient characteristics, and management.Ann Rheum Dis. 1995; 54: 959-964
- Early European contributions to rotator cuff repair at the turn of the 20th century.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20: 352-357
- The societal and economic value of rotator cuff repair.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: 1993-2000
- Analysis of rotator cuff repair trends in a large private insurance population.Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 623-629
- Total cost and operating room time comparison of rotator cuff repair techniques at low, intermediate, and high volume centers: Mini-open versus all-arthroscopic.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19: 716-721
- Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: A prospective study.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006; 15: 290-299
- Open versus arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A comparative view of 96 cases.Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 597-604
- Early postoperative outcomes between arthroscopic and mini-open repair for rotator cuff tears.Orthopedics. 2012; 35: e1347-e1352
- Report to Congress: Medicare and the health care delivery system.Published 2014. Accessed October 20, 2016)
- Hospital readmissions and the Affordable Care Act: Paying for coordinated quality care.JAMA. 2011; 306: 1794-1795
- Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36: 1824-1828
- The results of arthroscopic versus mini-open repair for rotator cuff tears at mid-term follow-up.J Orthop Surg Res. 2007; 2: 24
- All-arthroscopic versus mini-open repair of small to large sized rotator cuff tears: A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes.PLoS One. 2014; 9: e94421
- A comparative study of surgical invasion in arthroscopic and open rotator cuff repair.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18: 596-599
- Clinical outcome in all-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair in small to medium-sized tears: A randomized controlled trial in 100 patients with 1-year follow-up.Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 266-273
- All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: A retrospective review with minimum 2-year follow-up.Arthroscopy. 2006; 22: 587-594
- A two-year clinical outcomes study of 400 patients, comparing open surgery and arthroscopy for rotator cuff repair.Bone Joint Res. 2012; 1: 210-217
- Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: A comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14: 455-459
- Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: A prospective, randomized study with 24-month follow-up.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014; 24: 845-850
- User guide for the 2010 participant use data file.American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL2011
- Toward robust information: Data quality and inter-rater reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210: 6-16
- Quality improvement in surgery: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach.Adv Surg. 2010; 44: 251-267
- Using electronic health records for surgical quality improvement in the era of big data.JAMA Surg. 2015; 150: 24-29
- Infection after mini-open rotator cuff repair.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002; 11: 605-608
- Risk factors for readmission and revision surgery following rotator cuff repair.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466: 608-613
- Risk factors for infection after rotator cuff repair.Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 428-434
- Deep postoperative wound infection after carpal tunnel release.J Hand Surg Am. 1989; 14: 869-873
- Prolonged operative time correlates with increased infection rate after total knee arthroplasty.HSS J. 2006; 2: 70-72
- National trends in rotator cuff repair.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94: 227-233
- A survey of expert opinion regarding rotator cuff repair.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96: e123
- Health care coverage under the Affordable Care Act—A progress report.N Engl J Med. 2014; 371: 275-281
- Medicaid payer status is associated with in-hospital morbidity and resource utilization following primary total joint arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96: e180
- Medicaid status is associated with higher complication rates after spine surgery.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38: 1393-1400
- Impact of social factors on risk of readmission or mortality in pneumonia and heart failure: Systematic review.J Gen Intern Med. 2013; 28: 269-282
- Time to failure after rotator cuff repair: A prospective imaging study.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: 965-971
- Clinical outcome and tendon integrity of arthroscopic versus mini-open supraspinatus tendon repair: A magnetic resonance imaging-controlled matched-pair analysis.Arthroscopy. 2007; 23: 514-521
Published online: July 05, 2017
Accepted: April 12, 2017
Received: December 1, 2016
The authors report the following potential conflict of interest or source of funding: B.A.P. receives support from Wright Medical. Consultant. Help Lighting. Partial owner (augmented reality company).
© 2017 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America