Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 34, ISSUE 4, P1085-1093, April 2018

Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Primary Repair of Proximal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears Are Maintained at Mid-term Follow-up

  • Gregory S. DiFelice
    Affiliations
    Orthopaedic Sports Medicine and Trauma Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital; and Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, U.S.A.
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jelle P. van der List
    Correspondence
    Address correspondence to Jelle P. van der List, M.D., Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021, U.S.A.
    Affiliations
    Orthopaedic Sports Medicine and Trauma Service, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery; NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital; and Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York, U.S.A.
    Search for articles by this author
Published:January 18, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2017.10.028

      Purpose

      To assess the mid-term clinical outcomes in patients with proximal avulsion anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears undergoing arthroscopic primary repair with suture anchors.

      Methods

      The first 11 consecutive patients with proximal avulsion tears treated with arthroscopic primary repair were evaluated at mid-term (minimum 5-year) follow-up. Physical examination was performed; laxity examination consisting of the Lachman, pivot-shift, and anterior drawer tests was performed; and patients were asked to complete the Lysholm, modified Cincinnati, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaires.

      Results

      Of the 11 patients, 10 were seen at a mean follow-up of 6.0 ± 1.5 years (range, 4.8-9.2 years). One patient was lost to follow-up, in whom failure had already occurred at short-term follow-up. One additional patient underwent reoperation for a medial meniscus tear and also had a partial ACL tear; this patient was clinically stable at last follow-up. All patients had full range of motion. Nine patients had negative Lachman and negative pivot-shift examination findings (IKDC score of A), and 1 patient had a 1A Lachman result and 1+ pivot-shift result (IKDC score of B). The mean Lysholm score was 96.0 ± 4.5 (range, 88-100); modified Cincinnati score, 95.6 ± 7.4 (range, 80-100); Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, 95.4 ± 5.4 (range, 85-100); preinjury Tegner score, 7.2 ± 1.2 (range, 5-9); postoperative Tegner score, 6.6 ± 1.8 (range, 3-9); and IKDC subjective score, 92.3 ± 11.3 (range, 64-100).

      Conclusions

      The clinical outcomes of arthroscopic primary repair of proximal ACL tears with suture anchors are excellent and are maintained at mid-term follow-up in a carefully selected subset of patients with proximal tears and excellent tissue quality.

      Level of Evidence

      Level IV, therapeutic case series.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Robson A.W.
        VI. Ruptured crucial ligaments and their repair by operation.
        Ann Surg. 1903; 37: 716-718
        • Palmer I.
        On the injuries to the ligaments of the knee joint.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 1938; 53
        • O'Donoghue D.H.
        Surgical treatment of fresh injuries to the major ligaments of the knee.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1950; 32: 721-738
        • O'Donoghue D.H.
        An analysis of end results of surgical treatment of major injuries to the ligaments of the knee.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1955; 37: 1-13
        • Feagin J.A.
        • Abbott H.G.
        • Rokous J.R.
        The isolated tear of the anterior cruciate ligament.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972; 54: 1340-1341
        • England R.L.
        Repair of the ligaments about the knee.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1976; 7: 195-204
        • Marshall J.L.
        • Warren R.F.
        • Wickiewicz T.L.
        • Reider B.
        The anterior cruciate ligament: A technique of repair and reconstruction.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979; 143: 97-106
        • Heim U.
        • Bachmann B.
        • Infanger K.
        Reinsertion of the anterior cruciate ligament or primary ligamentous plasty?.
        Helv Chir Acta. 1982; 48: 703-708
        • Lysholm J.
        • Gillquist J.
        • Liljedahl S.O.
        Long-term results after early treatment of knee injuries.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 1982; 53: 109-118
        • Marshall J.L.
        • Warren R.F.
        • Wickiewicz T.L.
        Primary surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament lesions.
        Am J Sports Med. 1982; 10: 103-107
        • Odensten M.
        • Lysholm J.
        • Gillquist J.
        Suture of fresh ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. A 5-year follow-up.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 1984; 55: 270-272
        • Liljedahl S.O.
        • Lindvall N.
        • Wetterfors J.
        Early diagnosis and treatment of acute ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament; a clinical and arthrographic study of forty-eight cases.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1965; 47: 1503-1513
        • Sherman M.F.
        • Bonamo J.R.
        Primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament.
        Clin Sports Med. 1988; 7: 739-750
        • Straub T.
        • Hunter R.E.
        Acute anterior cruciate ligament repair.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988; 227: 238-250
        • Feagin Jr., J.A.
        • Curl W.W.
        Isolated tear of the anterior cruciate ligament: 5-Year follow-up study.
        Am J Sports Med. 1976; 4: 95-100
        • Engebretsen L.
        • Benum P.
        • Sundalsvoll S.
        Primary suture of the anterior cruciate ligament. A 6-year follow-up of 74 cases.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 1989; 60: 561-564
        • Kaplan N.
        • Wickiewicz T.L.
        • Warren R.F.
        Primary surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. A long-term follow-up study.
        Am J Sports Med. 1990; 18: 354-358
        • Sherman M.F.
        • Lieber L.
        • Bonamo J.R.
        • Podesta L.
        • Reiter I.
        The long-term followup of primary anterior cruciate ligament repair. Defining a rationale for augmentation.
        Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19: 243-255
        • van der List J.P.
        • DiFelice G.S.
        Primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: A paradigm shift.
        Surgeon. 2017; 15: 161-168
        • van der List J.P.
        • DiFelice G.S.
        The role of ligament repair in anterior cruciate ligament surgery.
        in: Mascarenhas R. Bhatia S. Lowe W.R. Ligamentous injuries of the knee. Ed 1. Nova Science Publishers, Houston2016: 199-220
        • van der List J.P.
        • DiFelice G.S.
        Preservation of the anterior cruciate ligament: A treatment algorithm based on tear location and tissue quality.
        Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016; 45: E393-E405
        • Genelin F.
        • Trost A.
        • Primavesi C.
        • Knoll P.
        Late results following proximal reinsertion of isolated ruptured ACL ligaments.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993; 1: 17-19
        • Strand T.
        • Molster A.
        • Hordvik M.
        • Krukhaug Y.
        Long-term follow-up after primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: Clinical and radiological evaluation 15-23 years postoperatively.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2005; 125: 217-221
        • Millett P.J.
        • Wickiewicz T.L.
        • Warren R.F.
        Motion loss after ligament injuries to the knee. Part I: Causes.
        Am J Sports Med. 2001; 29: 664-675
        • Shelbourne K.D.
        • Wilckens J.H.
        • Mollabashy A.
        • DeCarlo M.
        Arthrofibrosis in acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The effect of timing of reconstruction and rehabilitation.
        Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19: 332-336
        • Taylor S.A.
        • Khair M.M.
        • Roberts T.R.
        • DiFelice G.S.
        Primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: A systematic review.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 2233-2247
        • van der List J.P.
        • DiFelice G.S.
        Role of tear location on outcomes of open primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: A systematic review of historical studies.
        Knee. 2017; 24: 898-908
        • DiFelice G.S.
        • Villegas C.
        • Taylor S.A.
        Anterior cruciate ligament preservation: Early results of a novel arthroscopic technique for suture anchor primary anterior cruciate ligament repair.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 2162-2171
        • Achtnich A.
        • Herbst E.
        • Forkel P.
        • et al.
        Acute proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears: Outcomes after arthroscopic suture anchor repair versus anatomic single-bundle reconstruction.
        Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 2562-2569
        • Bigoni M.
        • Gaddi D.
        • Gorla M.
        • et al.
        Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament repair for proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears in skeletally immature patients: Surgical technique and preliminary results.
        Knee. 2017; 24: 40-48
        • Smith J.O.
        • Yasen S.K.
        • Palmer H.C.
        • Lord B.R.
        • Britton E.M.
        • Wilson A.J.
        Paediatric ACL repair reinforced with temporary internal bracing.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24: 1845-1851
        • Hohmann E.
        Editorial commentary: Renaissance of primary anterior cruciate ligament repair: Is history repeating itself?.
        Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 2570-2571
        • Lubowitz J.H.
        Editorial commentary: Anterior cruciate ligament primary repair, revisited.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 2172
        • van der List J.P.
        • Mintz D.N.
        • DiFelice G.S.
        The location of anterior cruciate ligament tears: A prevalence study using magnetic resonance imaging.
        Orthop J Sports Med. 2017; 5 (2325967117709966)
        • DiFelice G.S.
        • van der List J.P.
        Arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears.
        Arthrosc Tech. 2016; 5: E1057-E1061
        • van der List J.P.
        • DiFelice G.S.
        Preservation of the anterior cruciate ligament: Surgical techniques.
        Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016; 45: E406-E414
        • van der List J.P.
        • DiFelice G.S.
        Gap formation following primary repair of the anterior cruciate ligament: A biomechanical evaluation.
        Knee. 2017; 24: 243-249
        • van der List J.P.
        • DiFelice G.S.
        Range of motion and complications following primary repair versus reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.
        Knee. 2017; 24: 798-807
      1. Cavanaugh JT, Powers M. ACL rehabilitation progression: Where are we now? [published online August 8, 2017]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. doi:10.1007/s12178-017-9426-3.

        • Wilk K.E.
        • Arrigo C.A.
        Rehabilitation principles of the anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knee: Twelve steps for successful progression and return to play.
        Clin Sports Med. 2017; 36: 189-232
        • Lysholm J.
        • Gillquist J.
        Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale.
        Am J Sports Med. 1982; 10: 150-154
        • Noyes F.R.
        • Barber S.D.
        • Mooar L.A.
        A rationale for assessing sports activity levels and limitations in knee disorders.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; : 238-249
        • Shelbourne K.D.
        • Barnes A.F.
        • Gray T.
        Correlation of a single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) rating with modified Cincinnati knee rating system and IKDC subjective total scores for patients after ACL reconstruction or knee arthroscopy.
        Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40: 2487-2491
        • Tegner Y.
        • Lysholm J.
        Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985; : 43-49
        • Williams G.N.
        • Taylor D.C.
        • Gangel T.J.
        • Uhorchak J.M.
        • Arciero R.A.
        Comparison of the single assessment numeric evaluation method and the Lysholm score.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; : 184-192
        • Hefti F.
        • Muller W.
        • Jakob R.P.
        • Staubli H.U.
        Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993; 1: 226-234
        • Lubowitz J.H.
        Editorial commentary: Anterior cruciate ligament primary repair is a holy grail.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 2248
        • Proffen B.L.
        • Sieker J.T.
        • Murray M.M.
        Bio-enhanced repair of the anterior cruciate ligament.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 990-997
        • Murray M.M.
        Current status and potential of primary ACL repair.
        Clin Sports Med. 2009; 28: 51-61
        • Nguyen D.T.
        • Ramwadhdoebe T.H.
        • van der Hart C.P.
        • Blankevoort L.
        • Tak P.P.
        • van Dijk C.N.
        Intrinsic healing response of the human anterior cruciate ligament: An histological study of reattached ACL remnants.
        J Orthop Res. 2014; 32: 296-301
        • Nguyen D.T.
        • Geel J.
        • Schulze M.
        • et al.
        Healing of the goat anterior cruciate ligament after a new suture repair technique and bioscaffold treatment.
        Tissue Eng Part A. 2013; 19: 2292-2299
        • Crain E.H.
        • Fithian D.C.
        • Paxton E.W.
        • Luetzow W.F.
        Variation in anterior cruciate ligament scar pattern: Does the scar pattern affect anterior laxity in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees?.
        Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 19-24
        • van der List J.P.
        • DiFelice G.S.
        Successful arthroscopic primary repair of a chronic anterior cruciate ligament tear 11 years following injury.
        HSS J. 2017; 13: 90-95
        • Hetsroni I.
        • Delos D.
        • Fives G.
        • Boyle B.W.
        • Lillemoe K.
        • Marx R.G.
        Nonoperative treatment for anterior cruciate ligament injury in recreational alpine skiers.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 21: 1910-1914
        • Jorjani J.
        • Altmann D.
        • Auen R.
        • Koopmann C.
        • Lyutenski B.
        • Wirtz D.C.
        Medium- to long-term follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament rupture and repair in healing response technique.
        Z Orthop Unfall. 2013; 151 ([in German]): 570-579
        • Steadman J.R.
        • Matheny L.M.
        • Briggs K.K.
        • Rodkey W.G.
        • Carreira D.S.
        Outcomes following healing response in older, active patients: A primary anterior cruciate ligament repair technique.
        J Knee Surg. 2012; 25: 255-260
        • Higgins R.W.
        • Steadman J.R.
        Anterior cruciate ligament repairs in world class skiers.
        Am J Sports Med. 1987; 15: 439-447
        • Bram J.
        • Plaschy S.
        • Lutolf M.
        • Leutenegger A.
        The primary cruciate ligament suture—Is the method outdated? Results in follow-up of 58 patients.
        Z Unfallchir Versicherungsmed. 1994; 87 ([in German]): 91-109
        • van Eck C.F.
        • Limpisvasti O.
        • ElAttrache N.S.
        Is there a role for internal bracing and repair of the anterior cruciate ligament? A systematic literature review.
        Am J Sports Med. 2017; (363546517717956)
        • Strand T.
        • Engesaeter L.B.
        • Molster A.O.
        • et al.
        Knee function following suture of fresh tear of the anterior cruciate ligament.
        Acta Orthop Scand. 1984; 55: 181-184
      2. van der List JP, DiFelice GS. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging predicts eligibility for arthroscopic primary anterior cruciate ligament repair [published online July 13, 2017]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-017-4646-z.

        • Kuhne J.H.
        • Refior H.J.
        Primary suture of the anterior cruciate ligament. A critical analysis.
        Unfallchirurg. 1993; 96 ([in German]): 451-456
        • Andersson C.
        • Odensten M.
        • Good L.
        • Gillquist J.
        Surgical or non-surgical treatment of acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. A randomized study with long-term follow-up.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71: 965-974
        • Cross M.J.
        • Paterson R.S.
        • Capito C.P.
        Acute repair of the anterior cruciate ligament with lateral capsular augmentation.
        Am J Sports Med. 1989; 17: 63-67
        • Raunest J.
        • Derra E.
        • Ohmann C.
        Long term results following primary reconstruction of the cruciate ligaments without augmentation.
        Unfallchirurg. 1989; 17 ([in German]): 166-174
        • Webster K.E.
        • Feller J.A.
        Exploring the high reinjury rate in younger patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 2827-2832
        • Wiggins A.J.
        • Grandhi R.K.
        • Schneider D.K.
        • Stanfield D.
        • Webster K.E.
        • Myer G.D.
        Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 1861-1876
        • Sonnery-Cottet B.
        • Saithna A.
        • Cavalier M.
        • et al.
        Anterolateral ligament reconstruction is associated with significantly reduced ACL graft rupture rates at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.
        Am J Sports Med. 2017; (363546516686057)