Advertisement

Trends in the Surgical Management of Acromioclavicular Joint Arthritis Among Board-Eligible US Orthopaedic Surgeons

Published:February 21, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.01.024

      Purpose

      (1) Define the epidemiologic trend of distal clavicle excision (DCE) for acromioclavicular (AC) joint arthritis among board-eligible orthopaedic surgeons in the United States, (2) describe the rates and types of reported complications of open and arthroscopic DCE, and (3) evaluate the effect of fellowship training on preferred technique and reported complication rates.

      Methods

      The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) database was used to identify DCE cases submitted by ABOS Part II Board Certification examination candidates. Inclusion criteria were predetermined using a combination of ICD-9 and CPT codes. Cases were dichotomized into 2 groups: open or arthroscopic DCE. The 2 groups were then analyzed to determine trends in annual incidence, complication rates, and surgeon fellowship training.

      Results

      From April 2004 to September 2013, there were 3,229 open and 12,782 arthroscopic DCE procedures performed and submitted by ABOS Part II Board Eligible candidates. Overall, the annual incidence of open DCE decreased (78-37 cases per 10,000 submitted cases, P = .023). Although the annual number of arthroscopic DCE remained steady (1160-1125, P = .622), the percentage of DCE cases performed arthroscopically increased (65%-79%, P = .033). Surgeons without fellowship training were most likely to perform a DCE via an open approach (31%) whereas surgeons with sports medicine training were more likely to perform DCE arthroscopically compared with other fellowship groups (88%, P < .001). Open DCE was associated with a higher surgical complication rate overall when compared with arthroscopic DCE (9.4% vs 7.6%, respectively; P < .001). When compared with other fellowship-trained surgeons, sports medicine surgeons maintained a lower reported surgical complication rate whether performing open or arthroscopic DCE (5.5%, P = .027).

      Conclusions

      In recent years, open management of AC joint arthritis has declined among newly trained, board-eligible orthopaedic surgeons, possibly because of an increased complication rate associated with open treatment. Fellowship training was significantly associated with the type of treatment (open vs arthroscopic) rendered and complication rates.

      Level of Evidence

      Level IV, case series.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bigliani L.U.
        • Nicholson G.P.
        • Flatow E.L.
        Arthroscopic resection of the distal clavicle.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1993; 24: 133-141
        • Snyder S.J.
        • Banas M.P.
        • Karzel R.P.
        The arthroscopic Mumford procedure: An analysis of results.
        Arthroscopy. 1995; 11: 157-164
        • Martin S.D.
        • Baumgarten T.E.
        • Andrews J.R.
        Arthroscopic resection of the distal aspect of the clavicle with concomitant subacromial decompression.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83: 328-335
        • Corso S.J.
        • Furie E.
        Arthroscopy of the acromioclavicular joint.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1995; 26: 661-670
        • Flatow E.L.
        • Cordasco F.A.
        • Bigliani L.U.
        Arthroscopic resection of the outer end of the clavicle from a superior approach: A critical, quantitative, radiographic assessment of bone removal.
        Arthroscopy. 1992; 8: 55-64
        • Chronopoulos E.
        • Gill H.S.
        • Freehill M.T.
        • Petersen S.A.
        • McFarland E.G.
        Complications after open distal clavicle excision.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466: 646-651
        • Klimkiewicz J.J.
        • Williams G.R.
        • Sher J.S.
        • Karduna A.
        • Des Jardins J.
        • Iannotti J.P.
        The acromioclavicular capsule as a restraint to posterior translation of the clavicle: A biomechanical analysis.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1998; 8: 119-124
        • Renfree K.J.
        • Riley M.K.
        • Wheeler D.
        • Hentz J.G.
        • Wright T.W.
        Ligamentous anatomy of the distal clavicle.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003; 12: 355-359
        • Strauss E.J.
        • Barker J.U.
        • McGill K.
        • Verma N.N.
        The evaluation and management of failed distal clavicle excision.
        Sports Med Arthrosc. 2010; 18: 213-219
        • Matthews L.S.
        • Parks B.G.
        • Pavlovich Jr., L.J.
        • Giudice M.A.
        Arthroscopic versus open distal clavicle resection: A biomechanical analysis on a cadaveric model.
        Arthroscopy. 1999; 15: 237-240
        • Alluri R.K.
        • Kupperman A.I.
        • Montgomery S.R.
        • Wang J.C.
        • Hame S.L.
        Demographic analysis of open and arthroscopic distal clavicle excision in a private insurance database.
        Arthroscopy. 2014; 30: 1068-1074
        • Elhassan B.
        • Ozbaydar M.
        • Diller D.
        • Massimini D.
        • Higgins L.D.
        • Warner J.J.P.
        Open versus arthroscopic acromioclavicular joint resection: A retrospective comparison study.
        Arthroscopy. 2009; 25: 1224-1232
        • Cahill B.R.
        Osteolysis of the distal part of the clavicle in male athletes.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982; 64: 1053-1058
        • Pensak M.
        • Grumet R.C.
        • Slabaugh M.A.
        • Bach B.R.
        Open versus arthroscopic distal clavicle resection.
        Arthroscopy. 2010; 26: 697-704
        • Ellman H.
        • Kay S.P.
        Arthroscopic subacromial decompression for chronic impingement. Two- to five-year results.
        J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991; 73: 395-398
        • Gartsman G.M.
        • Combs A.H.
        • Davis P.F.
        • Tullos H.S.
        Arthroscopic acromioclavicular joint resection. An anatomical study.
        Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19: 2-5
        • Tolin B.S.
        • Snyder S.J.
        Our technique for the arthroscopic Mumford procedure.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1993; 24: 143-151
        • Rabalais R.D.
        • McCarty E.
        Surgical treatment of symptomatic acromioclavicular joint problems: A systematic review.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 455: 30-37
        • Blazar P.E.
        • Iannotti J.P.
        • Williams G.R.
        Anteroposterior instability of the distal clavicle after distal clavicle resection.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; 348: 114-120
        • Shubin Stein B.E.
        • Wiater J.M.
        • Pfaff H.C.
        • Bigliani L.U.
        • Levine W.N.
        Detection of acromioclavicular joint pathology in asymptomatic shoulders with magnetic resonance imaging.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001; 10: 204-208
        • Sachs R.A.
        • Stone M.L.
        • Devine S.
        Open vs. arthroscopic acromioplasty: A prospective, randomized study.
        Arthroscopy. 1994; 10: 248-254
        • Montgomery S.R.
        • Ngo S.S.
        • Hobson T.
        • et al.
        Trends and demographics in hip arthroscopy in the United States.
        Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 661-665
        • Vellios E.E.
        • Nazemi A.K.
        • Yeranosian M.G.
        • et al.
        Demographic trends in arthroscopic and open biceps tenodesis across the United States.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24: e279-e285
        • Werner B.C.
        • Burrus M.T.
        • Park J.S.
        • Perumal V.
        • Gwathmey F.W.
        Trends in ankle arthroscopy and its use in the management of pathologic conditions of the lateral ankle in the United States: A national database study.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 1330-1337
        • Basamania C.
        • Wirth M.
        • Rockwood C.
        • Moya D.
        Failed distal clavicle resections.
        Orthop Trans. 1995; 19: 355
        • Robertson W.J.
        • Griffith M.H.
        • Carroll K.
        • O'Donnell T.
        • Gill T.J.
        Arthroscopic versus open distal clavicle excision: A comparative assessment at intermediate-term follow-up.
        Am J Sport Med. 2011; 39: 2415-2420
        • Jerosch J.
        • Steinbeck J.
        • Schröder M.
        • Castro W.H.M.
        Arthroscopic resection of the acromioclavicular joint (ARAC).
        Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993; 1: 209-215
        • Yin B.
        • Gandhi J.
        • Limpisvasti O.
        • Mohr K.
        • ElAttrache N.S.
        Impact of fellowship training on clinical practice of orthopaedic sports medicine.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: e27