Purpose
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Level of Evidence
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to ArthroscopyReferences
- Mild or borderline hip dysplasia: are we characterizing hips with a lateral center-edge angle between 18 degrees and 25 degrees appropriately?.Am J Sports Med. 2019; 47: 112-122
- Rapidly progressive osteoarthritis after arthroscopic labral repair in patients with hip dysplasia.Arthroscopy. 2012; 28: 1738-1743
- Arthroscopy for labral tears in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip: a cautionary note.J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24: 110-113
- Patient and disease characteristics associated with hip arthroscopy failure in acetabular dysplasia.J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29: 160-163
- Do patients with BHD have inferior outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement compared with patients with normal acetabular coverage?.Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 2116-2124
- Hip arthroscopic surgery with labral preservation and capsular plication in patients with borderline hip dysplasia: minimum 5-year patient-reported outcomes.Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46: 305-313
- Hip arthroscopy in the setting of hip dysplasia: a systematic review.Bone Joint Res. 2016; 5: 225-231
- Complications associated with the periacetabular osteotomy: a prospective multicenter study.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96: 1967-1974
- Revision hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of diagnoses, operative findings, and outcomes.Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 1382-1390
- The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI syndrome): an international consensus statement.Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50: 1169-1176
- Improved outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery in patients undergoing T-capsulotomy with complete repair versus partial repair for femoroacetabular impingement: a comparative matched-pair analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 2634-2642
- Routine complete capsular closure during hip arthroscopy.Arthrosc Tech. 2013; 2: e89-e94
- The use of double-loaded suture anchors for labral repair and capsular repair during hip arthroscopy.Arthrosc Tech. 2012; 1: e213-e217
- Hip arthroscopy: patient assessment and indications.Instr Course Lect. 2003; 52: 711-719
- Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score in hip arthroscopy.Arthroscopy. 2007; 23: 822-826
- Evidence of reliability and responsiveness for the hip outcome score.Arthroscopy. 2008; 24: 676-682
- Preoperative outcome scores are predictive of achieving the minimal clinically important difference after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 612-619
- The patient acceptable symptomatic state for the modified Harris hip score and hip outcome score among patients undergoing surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement.Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 1844-1849
- Anteversion of the neck of the femur.Bone Joint J. 1952; 34: 181-186
- Shelf operation in congenital dysplasia of the acetabulum and in subluxation and dislocation of the hip.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1953; 35: 65-80
- Clinical and radiographic predictors of failed hip arthroscopy in the management of dysplasia: a systematic review and proposal for classification.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. February 28, 2019; ([Epub ahead of print])
- Trends of hip arthroscopy in the setting of acetabular dysplasia.J Hip Preserv Surg. 2018; 5: 267-273
- The interface between periacetabular osteotomy, hip arthroscopy and total hip arthroplasty in the young adult hip.EFORT Open Rev. 2018; 3: 408-417
- Periacetabular osteotomy after failed hip arthroscopy for labral tears in patients with acetabular dysplasia.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93: 57-61
- Early functional outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy after failed hip arthroscopic surgery for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia.Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 2460-2467
- Research pearls: the significance of statistics and perils of pooling. part 1: clinical versus statistical significance.Arthroscopy. 2017; 33: 1102-1112
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
See commentary on page 3248
The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: S.J.N. reports nonfinancial support from Allosource, Arthrex, Inc., Athletico, DJ Orthopaedics, Linvatec, Miomed, Smith & Nephew, Stryker; other from American Journal of Orthopedics, American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy Association of North America; personal fees from Ossur; personal fees and nonfinancial support form Springer. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
Identification
Copyright
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Editorial Commentary: Revision Arthroscopy for Borderline Dysplastic Hips: A Borderline Surgical IndicationArthroscopyVol. 35Issue 12
- PreviewPatients with mild or borderline acetabular dysplasia who present with refractory hip pain are challenging patients. Recommending open versus arthroscopic surgery for these patients is a difficult decision, in part because there are conflicting data regarding the outcomes of these procedures. Equally challenging is deciding on a treatment course in a borderline dysplastic patient who has not responded to a previous arthroscopic surgery. Surgeons must give great consideration before recommending revision arthroscopy in this setting.
- Full-Text
- Preview