Advertisement

Mental Health and Tobacco Use Are Correlated With Physical Function Outcomes in Patients With Knee Pain and Injury

      Purpose

      To examine the relation between the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) domains of Pain Interference (PROMIS-PI), Depression (PROMIS-D), and Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) for nonoperative patients presenting to our ambulatory sports orthopaedic clinic with knee complaints and to determine whether patient demographic characteristics influence PROMIS scores, particularly tobacco use.

      Methods

      All patients treated nonoperatively for a primary complaint of knee pain were recruited for participation. Patients were included if they completed all 3 PROMIS questionnaires prior to their clinical evaluation. Patients were excluded if their treatment plan determined that surgical intervention was warranted. Survey results were compiled, and statistical correlations were run between PROMIS domains and patient demographic characteristics.

      Results

      A total of 527 PROMIS questionnaire sets were included. PROMIS-PF had a strong negative correlation with PROMIS-PI (R = –0.75, P < .001) and a nearly moderate negative correlation with PROMIS-D (R = –0.47, P < .001). When evaluating patient demographic characteristics, we found a significant decrease in physical function scores and increases in pain and depression scores in both current and former tobacco users compared with nonsmokers. Differences in all PROMIS domains between smokers and nonsmokers exceeded minimal clinically important differences.

      Conclusions

      Our study showed an inverse correlation between PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-PF, as well as between PROMIS-D and PROMIS-PI, in patients seen in the ambulatory setting for knee complaints treated nonoperatively. A positive correlation was found between PROMIS-PI and PROMIS-D. Tobacco use was a patient demographic factor found to significantly impact PROMIS scores leading to minimal clinically important differences across all 3 PROMIS domains. The findings of this study may be used to identify patients at high risk of poor outcomes.

      Level of Evidence

      Level III, observational study.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Brodke D.J.
        • Saltzman C.L.
        • Brodke D.S.
        PROMIS for orthopaedic outcomes measurement.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016; 24: 744-749
        • Hung M.
        • Baumhauer J.F.
        • Latt L.D.
        • et al.
        Validation of PROMIS (R) Physical Function computerized adaptive tests for orthopaedic foot and ankle outcome research.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471: 3466-3474
        • Robins R.J.
        • Anderson M.B.
        • Zhang Y.
        • Presson A.P.
        • Burks R.T.
        • Greis P.E.
        Convergent validity of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System's Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Test for the knee and shoulder injury sports medicine patient population.
        Arthroscopy. 2017; 33: 608-616
        • Tyser A.R.
        • Beckmann J.
        • Franklin J.D.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function computer adaptive test in the upper extremity.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2014; 39: 2047-2051.e4
        • Makhni E.C.
        Editorial commentary: Are we comparing apples to oranges? The need for standardized outcomes reporting in orthopaedic surgery.
        Arthroscopy. 2017; 33: 484-485
        • Cella D.
        • Yount S.
        • Rothrock N.
        • et al.
        The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years.
        Med Care. 2007; 45: S3-S11
        • Fries J.F.
        • Witter J.
        • Rose M.
        • Cella D.
        • Khanna D.
        • Morgan-DeWitt E.
        Item response theory, computerized adaptive testing, and PROMIS: Assessment of physical function.
        J Rheumatol. 2014; 41: 153-158
        • Sahlqvist S.
        • Song Y.
        • Bull F.
        • et al.
        Effect of questionnaire length, personalisation and reminder type on response rate to a complex postal survey: Randomised controlled trial.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011; 11: 62
        • Hung M.
        • Franklin J.D.
        • Hon S.D.
        • Cheng C.
        • Conrad J.
        • Saltzman C.L.
        Time for a paradigm shift with computerized adaptive testing of general physical function outcomes measurements.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 1-7
        • Fidai M.S.
        • Saltzman B.M.
        • Meta F.
        • et al.
        Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and legacy patient-reported outcome measures in the field of orthopaedics: A systematic review.
        Arthroscopy. 2018; 34: 605-614
        • Makhni E.C.
        • Meadows M.
        • Hamamoto J.T.
        • Higgins J.D.
        • Romeo A.A.
        • Verma N.N.
        Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) in the upper extremity: The future of outcomes reporting?.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 26: 352-357
        • Mukaka M.M.
        Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research.
        Malawi Med J. 2012; 24: 69-71
        • Janssen S.J.
        • Paulino Pereira N.R.
        • Raskin K.A.
        • et al.
        A comparison of questionnaires for assessing physical function in patients with lower extremity bone metastases.
        J Surg Oncol. 2016; 114: 691-696
        • Morgan J.H.
        • Kallen M.A.
        • Okike K.
        • Lee O.C.
        • Vrahas M.S.
        PROMIS Physical Function Computer Adaptive Test compared with other upper extremity outcome measures in the evaluation of proximal humerus fractures in patients older than 60 years.
        J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29: 257-263
        • Hung M.
        • Nickisch F.
        • Beals T.C.
        • Greene T.
        • Clegg D.O.
        • Saltzman C.L.
        New paradigm for patient-reported outcomes assessment in foot & ankle research: Computerized adaptive testing.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2012; 33: 621-626
        • Papuga M.O.
        • Beck C.A.
        • Kates S.L.
        • Schwarz E.M.
        • Maloney M.D.
        Validation of GAITRite and PROMIS as high-throughput physical function outcome measures following ACL reconstruction.
        J Orthop Res. 2014; 32: 793-801
        • Doring A.C.
        • Nota S.P.
        • Hageman M.G.
        • Ring D.C.
        Measurement of upper extremity disability using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2014; 39: 1160-1165
        • Beckmann J.T.
        • Hung M.
        • Bounsanga J.
        • Wylie J.D.
        • Granger E.K.
        • Tashjian R.Z.
        Psychometric evaluation of the PROMIS Physical Function Computerized Adaptive Test in comparison to the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score and Simple Shoulder Test in patients with rotator cuff disease.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24: 1961-1967
        • Hung M.
        • Baumhauer J.F.
        • Brodsky J.W.
        • et al.
        Psychometric comparison of the PROMIS Physical Function CAT with the FAAM and FFI for measuring patient-reported outcomes.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 592-599
        • Kroenke K.
        • Shen J.
        • Oxman T.E.
        • Williams Jr., J.W.
        • Dietrich A.J.
        Impact of pain on the outcomes of depression treatment: Results from the RESPECT trial.
        Pain. 2008; 134: 209-215
        • Bair M.J.
        • Robinson R.L.
        • Katon W.
        • Kroenke K.
        Depression and pain comorbidity: A literature review.
        Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163: 2433-2445
        • Kim K.W.
        • Han J.W.
        • Cho H.J.
        • et al.
        Association between comorbid depression and osteoarthritis symptom severity in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93: 556-563
        • Han H.S.
        • Lee J.Y.
        • Kang S.B.
        • Chang C.B.
        The relationship between the presence of depressive symptoms and the severity of self-reported knee pain in the middle aged and elderly.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24: 1634-1642
        • Cho C.H.
        • Seo H.J.
        • Bae K.C.
        • Lee K.J.
        • Hwang I.
        • Warner J.J.
        The impact of depression and anxiety on self-assessed pain, disability, and quality of life in patients scheduled for rotator cuff repair.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22: 1160-1166
        • Main C.J.
        • Wood P.L.
        • Hollis S.
        • Spanswick C.C.
        • Waddell G.
        The Distress and Risk Assessment Method. A simple patient classification to identify distress and evaluate the risk of poor outcome.
        Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992; 17: 42-52
        • Potter M.Q.
        • Wylie J.D.
        • Greis P.E.
        • Burks R.T.
        • Tashjian R.Z.
        Psychological distress negatively affects self-assessment of shoulder function in patients with rotator cuff tears.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 3926-3932
        • Potter M.Q.
        • Wylie J.D.
        • Sun G.S.
        • Beckmann J.T.
        • Aoki S.K.
        Psychologic distress reduces preoperative self-assessment scores in femoroacetabular impingement patients.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 1886-1892
        • Lee A.C.
        • Driban J.B.
        • Price L.L.
        • Harvey W.F.
        • Rodday A.M.
        • Wang C.
        Responsiveness and minimally important differences for 4 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Forms: Physical function, pain interference, depression, and anxiety in knee osteoarthritis.
        J Pain. 2017; 18: 1096-1110
        • Kim S.J.
        • Lee S.K.
        • Kim S.H.
        • Kim S.H.
        • Ryu S.W.
        • Jung M.
        Effect of cigarette smoking on the clinical outcomes of ACL reconstruction.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96: 1007-1013
        • Myles P.S.
        • Iacono G.A.
        • Hunt J.O.
        • et al.
        Risk of respiratory complications and wound infection in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery: Smokers versus nonsmokers.
        Anesthesiology. 2002; 97: 842-847
        • Kanneganti P.
        • Harris J.D.
        • Brophy R.H.
        • Carey J.L.
        • Lattermann C.
        • Flanigan D.C.
        The effect of smoking on ligament and cartilage surgery in the knee: A systematic review.
        Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40: 2872-2878
        • Kowalchuk D.A.
        • Harner C.D.
        • Fu F.H.
        • Irrgang J.J.
        Prediction of patient-reported outcome after single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Arthroscopy. 2009; 25: 457-463
        • Creamer P.
        • Lethbridge-Cejku M.
        • Hochberg M.C.
        Factors associated with functional impairment in symptomatic knee osteoarthritis.
        Rheumatology (Oxford). 2000; 39: 490-496
        • Weiss E.
        Knee osteoarthritis, body mass index and pain: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.
        Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014; 53: 2095-2099
        • Jones C.A.
        • Cox V.
        • Jhangri G.S.
        • Suarez-Almazor M.E.
        Delineating the impact of obesity and its relationship on recovery after total joint arthroplasties.
        Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2012; 20: 511-518
        • Xu S.
        • Chen J.Y.
        • Lo N.N.
        • et al.
        The influence of obesity on functional outcome and quality of life after total knee arthroplasty.
        Bone Joint J. 2018; 100-B: 579-583
        • Singh J.A.
        • Lewallen D.G.
        Income and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after primary total knee arthroplasty.
        BMC Med. 2013; 11: 62
        • Barrack R.L.
        • Ruh E.L.
        • Chen J.
        • et al.
        Impact of socioeconomic factors on outcome of total knee arthroplasty.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 86-97

      Linked Article