Purpose
To evaluate the clinical and structural outcomes of arthroscopic side-to-side repair
of large U-shaped full-thickness rotator cuff tears (FTRCTs) by assessing the functional
score of the patients and the integrity of the tendon repair using magnetic resonance
imaging with a minimum follow-up duration of 2 years.
Methods
In this case series, 59 consecutive patients who underwent arthroscopic side-to-side
repair of large U-shaped FTRCTs, with a minimum follow-up duration of 2 years (range
25 to 72 months), were retrospectively enrolled. The mean patient age was 58.6 years.
Patients' functional scores and integrity of the tendon repairs were evaluated.
Results
The mean visual analog scale score improved from 5.7 ± 2.1 preoperatively to 2.4 ±
1.3 postoperatively (P < .001). The mean range of motion (forward flexion) improved from 152.7° ± 11.4°
to 164.5° ± 9.5° (P < .001). The mean Constant-Murley score improved from 57.3 ± 7.2 preoperatively to
77.8 ± 6.9 postoperatively (P < .001). Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging examinations demonstrated cuff
integrity with a retear rate of 54.2%. The retear rate of patients who underwent anchor
fixation to the medial row (45%) was significantly lower than that of patients who
underwent simple side-to-side repair (73.7%) (P = .039). The University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating and Constant-Murley
scores were not significantly different between the healed and retear groups (P = .639 and P = .863, respectively).
Conclusions
Arthroscopic side-to-side repair of large U-shaped FTRCTs demonstrated satisfactory
clinical outcomes. However, the retear rate was higher than expected when simple side-to-side
fixation was performed without footprint fixation. Therefore, medial row fixation
is recommended if arthroscopic side-to-side repair is performed.
Level of Evidence
III, comparative therapeutic trial.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to ArthroscopyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Rotator cuff tears: The effect of the reconstruction method on three-dimensional repair site area.Arthroscopy. 2002; 18: 519-526
- Rotator cuff repair. A biomechanical comparison of three techniques.Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31: 493-497
- Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Analysis of results by tear size and by repair technique-margin convergence versus direct tendon-to-bone repair.Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 905-912
- Anatomic reduction and next-generation fixation constructs for arthroscopic repair of crescent, L-shaped, and U-shaped rotator cuff tears.Arthroscopy. 2009; 25: 553-559
- The results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000; 82: 505-515
- Margin convergence: A method of reducing strain in massive rotator cuff tears.Arthroscopy. 1996; 12: 335-338
- The principle of margin convergence in rotator cuff repair as a means of strain reduction at the tear margin.Ann Biomed Eng. 2004; 32: 166-170
- A stepwise approach to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair based on biomechanical principles.Arthroscopy. 2000; 16: 82-90
- Rotator cuff integrity after arthroscopic repair for large tears with less-than-optimal footprint coverage.Arthroscopy. 2009; 25: 1093-1100
- High-tension double-row footprint repair compared with reduced-tension single-row repair for massive rotator cuff tears.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 35-39
- Biomechanics of massive rotator cuff tears: Implications for treatment.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 316-325
- Repair of massive rotator cuff tears in patients older than 70 years.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999; 8: 26-30
- Functional and anatomic results after rotator cuff repair.Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1994; : 43-53
- The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86: 219-224
- Humeral insertion of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. New anatomic findings regarding the footprint of the rotator cuff. Surgical technique.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 91: 1-7
- The tension required at repair to reappose the supraspinatus tendon to bone rapidly increases after injury.Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2004; : 258-265
- Arthroscopic side-to-side rotator cuff repair.Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 881-887
- Arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears using the side-to-side suture technique. Mid-term clinical and anatomic evaluation.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012; 98: S1-S8
- Technique for margin convergence in rotator cuff repair.Hosp Spec Surg. 2011; 7: 208-212
- Repair integrity and functional outcomes for arthroscopic margin convergence of rotator cuff tears.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: 536-541
- Comparison of mechanical stability in double-row rotator cuff repairs between a knotless transtendon construct versus the addition of medial knots.Arthroscopy. 2010; 26: S127-S133
- Arthroscopic shoelace side-to-side repair technique using ultratape for the treatment of longitudinal midsubstance rotator cuff tears.Arthrosc Techniques. 2017; 6: e1845-e1850
- Arthroscopic side-to-side repair of massive and contracted rotator cuff tears using a single uninterrupted suture: the shoestring bridge technique.Arthroscopy. 2012; 28: 754-760
- Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984; 66: 563-567
- Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan.Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1994; : 78-83
- Influence of cuff muscle fatty degeneration on anatomic and functional outcomes after simple suture of full-thickness tears.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003; 12: 550-554
- Fatty degeneration of the muscles of the rotator cuff: Assessment by computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1999; 8: 599-605
- Diagnosis and treatment of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001; 10: 37-46
- A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder.Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1987; : 160-164
- Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986; 68: 1136-1144
- Shoulder scoring scales for the evaluation of rotator cuff repair.Clin Orthop Rel Res. 2004; : 107-114
- The “3 Sister Portals” for arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears.Techniques Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 8: 53-57
- MR imaging of the shoulder after rotator cuff repair.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997; 168: 559-563
- Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: single-row versus dual-row fixation.Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 1307-1316
- Lesions of the musculotendinous cuff of the shoulder. The exposure and treatment of tears with retraction. 1944.Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1994; : 3-9
- Biomechanical evaluation of margin convergence.Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 330-338
- Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Clinical and arthroscopic second-look assessment.Arthroscopy. 1995; 11: 379
- Amplitude and strength of muscle contraction are reduced in experimental tears of the rotator cuff.Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 1456-1461
- Evaluation of in vivo rotator cuff muscle function after acute and chronic detachment of the supraspinatus tendon: An experimental study in an animal model.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93: 1702-1711
- Biomechanical effect of margin convergence techniques: Quantitative assessment of supraspinatus muscle stiffness.PloS One. 2016; 11: e0162110
- Inter-rater agreement of the Goutallier, Patte, and Warner classification scores using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in patients with rotator cuff tears.Arthroscopy. 2012; 28: 154-159
- Research pearls: The significance of statistics and perils of pooling. Part 1: Clinical versus statistical significance.Arthroscopy. 2017; 33: 1102-1112
Article Info
Publication History
Published online: November 07, 2019
Accepted:
July 3,
2019
Received:
January 14,
2019
Footnotes
See commentary on page 3219
The authors, their immediate families, and any research foundation with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any commercial entity related to the subject of this article. Final approval of the exemption from review by the Institutional Review Board was obtained for this study because of the study's retrospective nature (KHUH IRB 2018-07-067).
The authors report that they have no conflicts of interest in the authorship and publication of this article. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
Identification
Copyright
© 2019 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America
ScienceDirect
Access this article on ScienceDirectLinked Article
- Editorial Commentary: Side-to-side Rotator Cuff Repairs—Are Perfectly Placed Sutures Enough?ArthroscopyVol. 35Issue 12
- PreviewArthroscopic side-to-side rotator cuff repair of large U-shaped tears should incorporate repair of the greater tuberosity. Recent research has found that pain at rest and with motion, range of motion, strength, and University of California–Los Angeles and Constant scores improved overall in patients with side-to-side repairs. Although the clinical results were quite good overall, rotator cuff healing was found to be significantly better, with 28% improvement confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging evidence of healing when the side-to-side repair was further repaired to the tuberosity.
- Full-Text
- Preview
