Abstract
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to ArthroscopyReferences
- Progress in evidence-based medicine: A quarter century on.Lancet. 2017; 390: 415-423
- The SQUIRE (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: Explanation and elaboration.BMJ Qual Saf. 2008; 17: i13-i32
- The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies.PLoS Med. 2007; 4: e296
- A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: The long road to the EQUATOR network.J R Soc Med. 2016; 109: 67-77
- The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration.Ann Intern Med. 2003; 138: W1-W12
- (Published 2018. Accessed June 6, 2019.)
- Identifying and avoiding bias in research.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010; 126: 619
- Bias: Considerations for research practice.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008; 65: 2159-2168
- Bias in research.Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2013; 23: 12-15
- The misuse of statistics: Concepts, tools, and a research agenda.Account Res. 2002; 9: 65-74
- Testing a tool for assessing the risk of bias for nonrandomized studies showed moderate reliability and promising validity.J Clin Epidemiol. 2013; 66: 408-414
- ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.BMJ. 2016; 355: i4919
- Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement.Rev Esp Salud Pub. 2000; 74 ([in Spanish]): 597-602
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement.PLoS Med. 2009; 6e1000097
- Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: A proposal for reporting.JAMA. 2000; 283: 2008-2012
- Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: The CONSORT statement.JAMA. 1996; 276: 637-639
- Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: A comparative before-and-after evaluation.JAMA. 2001; 285: 1992-1995
- CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials.BMC Med. 2010; 8: 18
- STARD 2015: An updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.BMJ. 2015; 351: h5527
- SPIRIT 2013 statement: Defining standard protocol items for clinical trials.Ann Intern Med. 2013; 158: 200-207
- Expert opinion is necessary: Delphi Panel methodology facilitates a scientific approach to consensus.Arthroscopy. 2018; 34: 349-351
- Research pearls: Expert consensus based evidence using the Delphi method.Arthroscopy. 2018; 34: 3278-3282
- Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement.Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2013; 11: 6
- Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: The beginning of a consensus project.BMJ Qual Saf. 2005; 14: 319-325
- The SQUIRE guidelines: An evaluation from the field, 5 years post release.BMJ Qual Saf. 2015; 24: 769-775
- (Published 2017. Accessed June 23, 2019.)
- Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: The AGREE project.Qual Saf Health Care. 2003; 12: 18-23
- AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care.CMAJ. 2010; 182: E839-E842
- Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations.Acad Med. 2014; 89: 1245-1251
- The CARE guidelines: Consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development.J Med Case Rep. 2013; 7: 223
- Arthroscopy: Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery.(Published 2019. Accessed June 25, 2019.)
- Assessing the quality of studies in meta-analyses: Advantages and limitations of the Newcastle Ottawa Scale.World J Metaanal. 2017; 5: 80-84
- The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.BMJ. 2011; 343: d5928
- ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed.J Clin Epidemiol. 2016; 69: 225-234
- The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses.(Published 2001. Accessed June 5, 2019.)
- Reporting of non-hip score outcomes following femoroacetabular impingement surgery: A systematic review.J Hip Preserv Surg. 2015; 2: 224-241
- Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials.Phys Ther. 2003; 83: 713-721
- The GRADE handbook.Cochrane Collaboration, 2013
- Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: Clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies.Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2000; 10: 2-11
- Outcome of surgery for chronic Achilles tendinopathy: A critical review.Am J Sports Med. 2001; 29: 315-320
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study.Qual Life Res. 2010; 19: 539-549
- Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): Development and validation of a new instrument.ANZ J Surg. 2003; 73: 712-716
- The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998; 52: 377-384
- Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?.Control Clin Trials. 1996; 17: 1-12
- (Published 1999. Accessed June 27, 2019.)
- AMSTAR 2: A critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.BMJ. 2017; 358: j4008
- Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.BMJ. 2004; 328: 1490
- An assessment of the quality of rotator cuff randomized controlled trials: Utilizing the Jadad score and CONSORT criteria.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22: 1180-1185
- Using the STROBE statement to assess reporting of observational trials in hand surgery.J Hand Surg. 2013; 38: 1584
- Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: Have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement?.Radiology. 2013; 269: 413-426
- Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the orthopedic literature: Assessment of the current state of quality and proposal of a new rating strategy.Clin Res Orthop. 2018; 1: 1-7
- Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review.Med J Aust. 2006; 185: 263
- The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: Has it improved?.Neurology. 2006; 67: 792-797
- Does the CONSORT checklist for abstracts improve the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials on clinical pathways?.J Eval Clin Pract. 2014; 20: 827-833
Altman DG, I. Simera I. Using reporting guidelines effectively to ensure good reporting of health research [Chapter 4]. In: Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Simera I, Wager E, eds. Guidelines for reporting health research: A user's manual. Ed 1. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.; 2014.
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: J.B. receives personal fees from the Arthroscopy Association of North America for Arthroscopy, outside the submitted work. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.