No Differences in Hip Joint Space Measurements Between Weightbearing or Supine Anteroposterior Pelvic Radiographs


      To to assess whether there are any significant differences in hip joint space width (JSW) between weight-bearing versus supine pelvic radiographs.


      Standing and supine anteroposterior pelvic radiographs of 86 patients (146 hips) were included. Sample size was sufficiently powered to assess for equivalence between standing and supine films for JSW measurements made at the medial, lateral, and central aspects of the sourcil line. Measurements were made by 2 independent reviewers blinded to patient positioning. Each reviewer repeated a subset of the measurements to assess intra-rater reproducibility. Mean differences in joint space measurements between standing and supine radiographs were reported for each point of the sourcil. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for inter and intra-rater reliability were also calculated.


      There were no significant differences between JSW measurements made on standing and supine pelvic radiographs (P = .468). Furthermore, equivalence testing demonstrated statistical equivalence between standing and supine JSW measurements made based on an equivalence threshold of ±0.5 mm. Inter-rater reliability demonstrated good agreement with an overall ICC of 0.775 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.734-0.809). Intra-rater reliability also demonstrated good agreement with ICCs of 0.84 (95% CI 0.758-0.889) and 0.798 (95% CI 0.721-0.851) for the 2 reviewers, respectively.


      JSW measurements on standing and supine pelvic radiographs were not significantly different, and their inter-rater agreement and intra-rater reproducibility demonstrated good reliability and repeatability. Therefore, either may be used to assess JSW, including measurements that may impact treatment decisions for hip arthroscopy.

      Level of Evidence

      Level III; retrospective comparative study
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Degen R.M.
        • Nawabi D.H.
        • Bedi A.
        • Kelly B.T.
        Radiographic predictors of femoroacetabular impingement treatment outcomes.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 25: 36-44
        • Larson C.M.
        • Giveans M.R.
        • Taylor M.
        Does arthroscopic FAI correction improve function with radiographic arthritis?.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469: 1667-1676
        • Lebus G.F.
        • Briggs K.K.
        • Dornan G.J.
        • McNamara S.
        • Philippon M.J.
        Acetabular labral reconstruction: Development of a tool to predict outcomes.
        Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46: 3119-3126
        • Nwachukwu B.U.
        • Rebolledo B.J.
        • McCormick F.
        • Rosas S.
        • Harris J.D.
        • Kelly B.T.
        Arthroscopic versus open treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: A systematic review of medium- to long-term outcomes.
        Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 1062-1068
        • Öhlin A.
        • Ahldén M.
        • Lindman I.
        • et al.
        Good 5-year outcomes after arthroscopic treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 28: 1311-1316
        • Philippon M.J.
        • Schroder E.S.B.G.
        • Briggs K.K.
        Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in patients aged 50 years or older.
        Arthroscopy. 2012; 28: 59-65
        • Fuchs-Winkelmann S.
        • Peterlein C.D.
        • Tibesku C.O.
        • Weinstein S.L.
        Comparison of pelvic radiographs in weightbearing and supine positions.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466: 809-812
        • Conrozier T.
        • Lequesne M.G.
        • Tron A.M.
        • Mathieu P.
        • Berdah L.
        • Vignon E.
        The effects of position on the radiographic joint space in osteoarthritis of the hip.
        Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1997; 5: 17-22
        • Troelsen A.
        • Jacobsen S.
        • Rømer L.
        • Søballe K.
        Weightbearing anteroposterior pelvic radiographs are recommended in DDH assessment.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466: 813-819
        • Auleley G.R.
        • Rousselin B.
        • Ayral X.
        • Edouard-Noel R.
        • Dougados M.
        • Ravaud P.
        Osteoarthritis of the hip: Agreement between joint space width measurements on standing and supine conventional radiographs.
        Ann Rheum Dis. 1998; 57: 519-523
        • Terjesen T.
        • Gunderson R.B.
        Reliability of radiographic parameters in adults with hip dysplasia.
        Skeletal Radiol. 2012; 41: 811-816
        • Kovalenko B.
        • Bremjit P.
        • Fernando N.
        Classifications in brief: Tönnis classification of hip osteoarthritis.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018; 476: 1680-1684
        • Crowe J.F.
        • Mani V.J.
        • Ranawat C.S.
        Total hip replacement in congenital dislocation and dysplasia of the hip.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979; 61: 15-23
        • Mannava S.
        • Geeslin A.G.
        • Frangiamore S.J.
        • et al.
        Comprehensive clinical evaluation of femoroacetabular impingement: Part 2, plain radiography.
        Arthrosc Tech. 2017; 6: e2003-e2009
        • Koo T.K.
        • Li M.Y.
        A Guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research.
        J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15: 155-163
        • Lakens D.
        Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses.
        Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2017; 8: 355-362