Advertisement

Mid-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Gluteus Medius Repair With Concomitant Arthroscopic Labral Treatment: A Propensity-Matched Controlled Study

      Purpose

      To report mid-term outcomes of patients who underwent endoscopic gluteus medius (GM) repair with arthroscopic labral treatment and to compare them with a control cohort of patients who underwent arthroscopic labral treatment without an endoscopic GM repair.

      Methods

      Data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed for all patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy between February 2008 and August 2013. Patients were included if they underwent arthroscopic labral treatment, endoscopic GM repair, and had preoperative with minimum 5-year follow-up for the following patient-reported outcomes: modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Nonarthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and Hip Outcome Score-Sports Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS). Propensity score matching was used to create a control cohort of patients who underwent primary arthroscopic labral treatment without GM repair.

      Results

      There were a total of 46 patients with GM repair eligible for the current study, of whom 43 (93.5%) had 5-year follow-up. The average follow-up time was 73.4 months. At minimum 5-year follow-up, all PROs significantly improved (P < .001). Among the entire GM repair cohort, rates for achieving the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for mHHS, HOS-SSS, and international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) were 74.4%, 51.9%, and 71.8%, respectively. Rates for reaching a minimal clinically important difference for mHHS, NAHS, and HOS-SSS were 79.5%, 89.7%, and 73.1%, respectively. When the GM repair cohort was matched, there were 37 cases in the GM repair cohort and 78 in the control cohort. The GM repair cohort outcomes compared satisfactorily to the control cohort for mHHS (82.3 vs 82.6), NAHS (81.9 vs 82.3), and HOS-SSS (66.3 vs 67.5). Rates of achieving minimal clinically important difference and PASS for mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, and iHOT-12 were also favorable.

      Conclusions

      Endoscopic GM repair with arthroscopic labral treatment results in safe, durable, and significant improvement in PROs at a minimum 5-year follow-up. The outcomes compared favorably with a control cohort without GM tears.

      Level of Evidence

      III, retrospective comparative study.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Alpaugh K.
        • Chilelli B.J.
        • Xu S.
        • Martin S.D.
        Outcomes after primary open or endoscopic abductor tendon repair in the hip: A systematic review of the literature.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 530-540
        • Chandrasekaran S.
        • Lodhia P.
        • Gui C.
        • Vemula S.P.
        • Martin T.J.
        • Domb B.G.
        Outcomes of open versus endoscopic repair of abductor muscle tears of the hip: A systematic review.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 2057-2067.e2
        • Robertson W.J.
        • Gardner M.J.
        • Barker J.U.
        • Boraiah S.
        • Lorich D.G.
        • Kelly B.T.
        Anatomy and dimensions of the gluteus medius tendon insertion.
        Arthroscopy. 2008; 24: 130-136
        • Docking S.I.
        • Cook J.
        • Chen S.
        • et al.
        Identification and differentiation of gluteus medius tendon pathology using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
        Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2019; 41: 1-5
        • Hartigan D.E.
        • Perets I.
        • Walsh J.P.
        • Domb B.G.
        Imaging of abductor tears: Stepwise technique for accurate diagnosis.
        Arthrosc Tech. 2017; 6: e1523-e1527
        • Oehler N.
        • Ruby J.K.
        • Strahl A.
        • Maas R.
        • Ruether W.
        • Niemeier A.
        Hip abductor tendon pathology visualized by 1.5 versus 3. 0 Tesla MRIs.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020; 140: 145-153
        • Voos J.E.
        • Shindle M.K.
        • Pruett A.
        • Asnis P.D.
        • Kelly B.T.
        Endoscopic repair of gluteus medius tendon tears of the hip.
        Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 743-747
        • Bonazza N.A.
        • Homcha B.
        • Liu G.
        • Leslie D.L.
        • Dhawan A.
        Surgical trends in arthroscopic hip surgery using a large national database.
        Arthrosc J Arthroscopy. 2018; 34: 1825-1830
        • Aprato A.
        • Jayasekera N.
        • Villar R.N.
        Does the modified Harris Hip Score reflect patient satisfaction after hip arthroscopy?.
        Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40: 2557-2560
        • Christensen C.P.
        • Althausen P.L.
        • Mittleman M.A.
        • Lee J.
        • McCarthy J.C.
        The nonarthritic hip score: Reliable and validated.
        Clin Orthop. 2003; : 75-83
        • Martin R.L.
        • Philippon M.J.
        Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score in hip arthroscopy.
        Arthroscopy. 2007; 23: 822-826
        • Lall A.C.
        • Schwarzman G.R.
        • Battaglia M.R.
        • Chen S.L.
        • Maldonado D.R.
        • Domb B.G.
        Greater trochanteric pain syndrome: An intraoperative endoscopic classification system with pearls to surgical techniques and rehabilitation protocols.
        Arthrosc Tech. 2019; 8: e889-e903
        • Bogunovic L.
        • Lee S.X.
        • Haro M.S.
        • et al.
        Application of the Goutallier/Fuchs rotator cuff classification to the evaluation of hip abductor tendon tears and the clinical correlation with outcome after repair.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 2145-2151
        • Lall A.C.
        • Saadat A.A.
        • Battaglia M.R.
        • Maldonado D.R.
        • Perets I.
        • Domb B.G.
        Perineal pressure during hip arthroscopy is reduced by use of Trendelenburg: A prospective study with randomized order of positioning.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019; 477: 1851-1857
        • Maldonado D.R.
        • Chen J.W.
        • Walker-Santiago R.
        • et al.
        Forget the greater trochanter! Hip joint access with the 12 o’clock portal in hip arthroscopy.
        Arthrosc Tech. 2019; 8: e575-e584
        • Seldes R.M.
        • Tan V.
        • Hunt J.
        • Katz M.
        • Winiarsky R.
        • Fitzgerald R.H.
        Anatomy, histologic features, and vascularity of the adult acetabular labrum.
        Clin Orthop. 2001; : 232-240
        • Suarez-Ahedo C.
        • Gui C.
        • Rabe S.M.
        • Chandrasekaran S.
        • Lodhia P.
        • Domb B.G.
        Acetabular chondral lesions in hip arthroscopy: Relationships between grade, topography, and demographics.
        Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 2501-2506
        • Cameron M.L.
        • Briggs K.K.
        • Steadman J.R.
        Reproducibility and reliability of the Outerbridge classification for grading chondral lesions of the knee arthroscopically.
        Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31: 83-86
        • Mansor Y.
        • Perets I.
        • Close M.R.
        • Mu B.H.
        • Domb B.G.
        In search of the spherical femoroplasty: Cam overresection leads to inferior functional scores before and after revision hip arthroscopic surgery.
        Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46: 2061-2071
        • Ortiz-Declet V.
        • Mu B.
        • Chen A.W.
        • et al.
        The “bird’s eye” and “upper deck” views in hip arthroscopy: Powerful arthroscopic perspectives for acetabuloplasty.
        Arthrosc Tech. 2018; 7: e13-e16
        • Redmond J.M.
        • El Bitar Y.F.
        • Gupta A.
        • Stake C.E.
        • Vemula S.P.
        • Domb B.G.
        Arthroscopic acetabuloplasty and labral refixation without labral detachment.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 105-112
        • Harris M.D.
        • Kapron A.L.
        • Peters C.L.
        • Anderson A.E.
        Correlations between the alpha angle and femoral head asphericity: Implications and recommendations for the diagnosis of cam femoroacetabular impingement.
        Eur J Radiol. 2014; 83: 788-796
        • Ortiz-Declet V.
        • Mu B.H.
        • Yuen L.C.
        • et al.
        The “upper deck view” improves visualization during acetabuloplasty without chondro-labral detachment.
        J Hip Preserv Surg. 2019; 6: 183-188
        • Domb B.G.
        • Rybalko D.
        • Mu B.
        • Litrenta J.
        • Chen A.W.
        • Perets I.
        Acetabular microfracture in hip arthroscopy: Clinical outcomes with minimum 5-year follow-up.
        Hip Int. 2018; 28: 649-656
        • Maldonado D.R.
        • Laseter J.R.
        • Perets I.
        • et al.
        The effect of complete tearing of the ligamentum teres in patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears: A match-controlled study.
        Arthroscopy. 2019; 35: 80-88
        • Maldonado D.R.
        • Krych A.J.
        • Levy B.A.
        • Hartigan D.E.
        • Laseter J.R.
        • Domb B.G.
        Does Iliopsoas lengthening adversely affect clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy? A multicenter comparative study.
        Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46: 2624-2631
        • Maldonado D.R.
        • Lall A.C.
        • Battaglia M.R.
        • Laseter J.R.
        • Chen J.W.
        • Domb B.G.
        Arthroscopic Iliopsoas Fractional Lengthening.
        JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2018; 8: e30
        • Domb B.G.
        • Hartigan D.E.
        • Perets I.
        Decision making for labral treatment in the hip: Repair Versus débridement versus reconstruction.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017; 25
        • Domb B.G.
        • Philippon M.J.
        • Giordano B.D.
        Arthroscopic capsulotomy, capsular repair, and capsular plication of the hip: Relation to atraumatic instability.
        Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 162-173
        • Domb B.G.
        • Nasser R.M.
        • Botser I.B.
        Partial-thickness tears of the gluteus medius: Rationale and technique for trans-tendinous endoscopic repair.
        Arthroscopy. 2010; 26: 1697-1705
        • Domb B.G.
        • Carreira D.S.
        Endoscopic repair of full-thickness gluteus medius tears.
        Arthrosc Tech. 2013; 2: e77-e81
        • Chandrasekaran S.
        • Gui C.
        • Walsh J.P.
        • Lodhia P.
        • Suarez-Ahedo C.
        • Domb B.G.
        Correlation between changes in visual analog scale and patient-reported outcome scores and patient satisfaction after hip arthroscopic surgery.
        Orthop J Sports Med. 2017; 5
        • Griffin D.R.
        • Parsons N.
        • Mohtadi N.G.H.
        • Safran M.R.
        Multicenter Arthroscopy of the Hip Outcomes Research Network. A short version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) for use in routine clinical practice.
        Arthroscopy. 2012; 28 (quiz 616-618): 611-616
        • Norman G.R.
        • Sloan J.A.
        • Wyrwich K.W.
        Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: The remarkable universality of half a standard deviation.
        Med Care. 2003; 41: 582-592
        • Chahal J.
        • Van Thiel G.S.
        • Mather R.C.
        • et al.
        The patient acceptable symptomatic state for the Modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score among patients undergoing surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 1844-1849
        • Nwachukwu B.U.
        • Chang B.
        • Beck E.C.
        • et al.
        How should we define clinically significant outcome improvement on the iHOT-12?.
        HSS J. 2019; 15: 103-108
        • Harris J.D.
        • Brand J.C.
        • Cote M.P.
        • Faucett S.C.
        • Dhawan A.
        Research pearls: The significance of statistics and perils of pooling. part 1: clinical versus statistical significance.
        Arthroscopy. 2017; 33: 1102-1112
        • Voos J.E.
        • Rudzki J.R.
        • Shindle M.K.
        • Martin H.
        • Kelly B.T.
        Arthroscopic anatomy and surgical techniques for peritrochanteric space disorders in the hip.
        Arthroscopy. 2007; 23: 1246.e1-1246.e5
        • Chandrasekaran S.
        • Gui C.
        • Hutchinson M.R.
        • Lodhia P.
        • Suarez-Ahedo C.
        • Domb B.G.
        Outcomes of endoscopic gluteus medius repair: Study of thirty-four patients with minimum two-year follow-up.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: 1340-1347
        • Perets I.
        • Mansor Y.
        • Yuen L.C.
        • Chen A.W.
        • Chaharbakhshi E.O.
        • Domb B.G.
        Endoscopic gluteus medius repair with concomitant arthroscopy for labral tears: A case series with minimum 5-year outcomes.
        Arthroscopy. 2017; 33: 2159-2167
        • Mygind-Klavsen B.
        • Lund B.
        • Nielsen T.G.
        • et al.
        Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry: Predictors of outcome in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 27: 3110-3120
        • Domb B.G.
        • Chen S.L.
        • Shapira J.
        • Maldonado D.R.
        • Lall A.C.
        • Rosinsky P.J.
        The evolution of hip arthroscopy: What has changed since 2008—a single surgeon’s experience.
        Arthroscopy. 2020; 36: 761-772
        • Hartigan D.E.
        • Perets I.
        • Ho S.W.
        • Walsh J.P.
        • Yuen L.C.
        • Domb B.G.
        Endoscopic repair of partial-thickness undersurface tears of the abductor tendon: Clinical outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up.
        Arthroscopy. 2018; 34: 1193-1199