Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 37, ISSUE 3, P964-971, March 2021

Preoperative Patient-Centric Predictors of Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Meniscectomy

Published:October 31, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2020.10.042

      Purpose

      To determine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) using Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) computer-adaptive testing assessments in patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. The secondary purpose was to identify which preoperative patient factors are associated with MCID achievement.

      Methods

      Three PROMIS computer-adaptive testing assessments (Physical Function [PF], Pain Interference [PI], and Depression [D]) were administered to all patients presenting to 1 of 2 board-certified, sports medicine orthopaedic surgeons. Patients with Current Procedural Terminology codes of 29880 or 29881 were chart reviewed for a host clinical and demographic factors. PROMIS scores were assessed for improvement and patient characteristics were assessed for influence on any improvement. MCID was calculated according to the distribution methodology and receiver operating characteristics were used to assess preoperative scores predictive ability.

      Results

      In total, 166 patients met inclusion criteria (58 exclusions). Postoperative PROMIS-PF (45.6), PROMIS-PI (54.6), and PROMIS-D (44.1) significantly improved at least 3 months after surgery when compared with baseline (P = .002). MCID values for PROMIS-PF, PROMIS-PI, and PROMIS-D were 3.5, 3.3, and 4.4, respectively. Individuals with PROMIS-PF scores below 34.9 yielded an 82% probability of achieving MCID, while PROMIS-PI scores above 67.5 yielded an 86% probability of achieving MCID and a cutoff of 58.9 for PROMIS-D yielded a 60% probability of achieving MCID, with 90% specificity.

      Conclusions

      PROMIS scores, obtained preoperatively, were shown to be valid predictors of postoperative clinical improvement in patients undergoing meniscectomy. Our findings suggest that patients with physical function scores of 34.9 or less have an increased probability of reaching a minimal clinically important difference. Similarly, patients with pain interference scores of 67.5 and above have increased probability of reaching MCID for pain interference. These cutoffs may be used by physicians to aid in the counseling of patients considering arthroscopic meniscectomy.

      Level of Evidence

      IV, Case Series.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Thorlund J.B.
        • Englund M.
        • Christensen R.
        • et al.
        Patient reported outcomes in patients undergoing arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for traumatic or degenerative meniscal tears: Comparative prospective cohort study [published online February 2, 2017]. BMJ.
        https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j356
        • Azam M.
        • Shenoy R.
        The role of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in the management of degenerative meniscus tears: A review of the recent literature.
        Open Orthop J. 2017; 10: 797-804
        • Sihvonen R.
        • Paavola M.
        • Malmivaara A.
        • et al.
        Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus sham surgery for a degenerative meniscal tear.
        N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 2515-2524
        • van de Graaf V.
        • Bloembergen C.H.
        • Willigenburg N.W.
        • et al.
        Can even experienced orthopaedic surgeons predict who will benefit from surgery when patients present with degenerative meniscal tears? A survey of 194 orthopaedic surgeons who made 3880 predictions.
        Br J Sports Med. 2020; 54: 354-359
        • Papuga M.O.
        • Beck C.A.
        • Kates S.L.
        • Schwarz E.M.
        • Maloney M.D.
        Validation of GAITRite and PROMIS as high-throughput physical function outcome measures following ACL reconstruction.
        J Orthop Res. 2014; 32: 793-801
        • Tyser A.R.
        • Beckmann J.
        • Franklin J.D.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the PROMIS physical function computer adaptive test in the upper extremity.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2014; 39: 2047-2051
        • Patterson B.M.
        • Orvets N.D.
        • Aleem A.W.
        • et al.
        Correlation of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores with legacy patient-reported outcome scores in patients undergoing rotator cuff repair.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27: S17-S23
        • Tishelman J.C.
        • Vasquez-Montes D.
        • Jevotovsky D.S.
        • et al.
        Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System instruments: outperforming traditional quality of life measures in patients with back and neck pain [published online February 1, 2019]. J Neurosurg Spine.
        https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.10.SPINE18571
        • Day C.S.
        • Makhni E.C.
        • Mejia E.
        • Lage D.E.
        • Rozental T.D.
        Carpal and cubital tunnel syndrome: Who gets surgery?.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468: 1796-1803
        • Chen R.E.
        • Papuga M.O.
        • Nicandri G.T.
        • Miller R.J.
        • Voloshin I.
        Preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores predict postoperative outcome in total shoulder arthroplasty patients.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019; 28: 547-554
        • Ho B.
        • Houck J.R.
        • Flemister A.S.
        • et al.
        Preoperative PROMIS scores predict postoperative success in foot and ankle patients.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2016; 37: 911-918
        • Carragee E.J.
        • Cheng I.
        Minimum acceptable outcomes after lumbar spinal fusion.
        Spine J. 2010; 10: 313-320
        • Glassman S.D.
        • Copay A.G.
        • Berven S.H.
        • Polly D.W.
        • Subach B.R.
        • Carreon L.Y.
        Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 1839-1847
        • Leopold S.S.
        Editor’s Spotlight/Take 5: Comparative responsiveness and minimal clinically important differences for idiopathic ulnar impaction syndrome (DOI 10.1007/s11999-013-2843-8).
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471: 1403-1405
        • Shauver M.J.
        • Chung K.C.
        The minimal clinically important difference of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2009; 34: 509-514
        • Hajian-Tilaki K.
        Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis for medical diagnostic test evaluation.
        Casp J Intern Med. 2013; 4: 627-635
        • Hung M.
        • Bounsanga J.
        • Voss M.W.
        • Saltzman C.L.
        Establishing minimum clinically important difference values for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function, hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction, and knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for joint reconstruction in orthopaedics.
        World J Orthop. 2018; 9: 41-49
        • Okoroha K.R.
        • Lu Y.
        • Nwachukwu B.U.
        • et al.
        How should we define clinically significant improvement on patient-reported outcomes measurement information system test for patients undergoing knee meniscal surgery?.
        Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2020; 36: 241-250
        • Chen R.E.
        • Papuga M.O.
        • Voloshin I.
        • et al.
        Preoperative PROMIS scores predict postoperative outcomes after primary ACL reconstruction [published online May 8, 2018]. Orthop J Sport Med.
        https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118771286
        • Bernholt D.
        • Wright R.W.
        • Matava M.J.
        • Brophy R.H.
        • Bogunovic L.
        • Smith M.V.
        Patient Reported outcomes measurement information system scores are responsive to early changes in patient outcomes following arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.
        Arthroscopy. 2018; 34: 1113-1117
        • Tramer J.S.
        • Franovic S.
        • Kuhlmann N.
        • et al.
        Preoperative PROMIS scores predict postoperative improvements following rotator cuff repair.
        (Accessed December 26, 2019)
        • Bernstein D.N.
        • Fear K.
        • Mesfin A.
        • et al.
        Patient-reported outcomes use during orthopaedic surgery clinic visits improves the patient experience.
        Musculoskeletal Care. 2019; 17: 120-125
        • Revicki D.
        • Hays R.D.
        • Cella D.
        • Sloan J.
        Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 61: 102-109