Advertisement
Original Article| Volume 37, ISSUE 3, P837-842, March 2021

Download started.

Ok

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With and Without Curettage of the Glenoid Edge: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

Published:November 26, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2020.11.042

      Abstract

      Purpose

      To determine whether curettage of the cartilage on the glenoid edge in arthroscopic Bankart repair reduces the postoperative recurrence rate compared with noncuretted glenoid.

      Methods

      Between January 2010 and December 2013, 134 patients underwent arthroscopy and stabilization for recurrent anterior dislocation of shoulder; 42 patients were excluded. Alternate glenoid edge was curetted in 92 patients undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair. Twelve patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining 80 patients were divided into 2 groups of 40 patients each, curettage and noncurettage. In both groups, the Bankart lesion was repaired using ≥3 bioanchors loaded with nonabsorbable braided sutures. Postoperative rehabilitation was the same for the 2 groups. We recorded recurrence of instability, pain, and Constant and Rowe shoulder scores. Statistical analysis of data was performed using unpaired t test (significance level P < .05).

      Results

      The 2 groups were comparable in terms of age, number of dislocations, and bone loss. The average follow-up was 7 years and 9 months (range 6 to 10 years). Of the total 40 patients in the curettage group, 6 (15%) had recurrence of dislocation and none had subluxations, whereas in the noncurettage group, 13 (32.5%) had recurrence of dislocation and 3 (7.5%) had subluxations. The difference in postoperative recurrence of instability was statistically significant (P = .012). The average (standard deviation) Rowe score was 83.75 (23.28) in the curettage group and 70.13 (31.29) in the noncurettage group (P = .030).

      Conclusions

      During arthroscopic Bankart repair, curettage of the cartilage on the anterior glenoid edge reduces the incidence of postoperative recurrence of instability.

      Level of Evidence

      II, therapeutic; prospective, randomized, controlled study.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bankart A.S.
        Recurrent or habitual dislocation of the shoulder joint.
        Br Med J. 1923; 2: 1132-1133
        • Fabre T.
        • Abi-Chahla M.L.
        • Billaud A.
        • et al.
        Long-term results with Bankart procedure: A 26-year follow-up study of 50 cases.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19: 318-323
        • Neviaser R.J.
        • Benke M.T.
        • Neviaser A.S.
        Mid-term to long-term outcome of the open Bankart repair for recurrent traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 26 (1943-1447)
        • Fabbriciani C.
        • Milano G.
        • Demontis A.
        • Fadda S.
        • Ziranu F.
        • Mulas P.D.
        Arthroscopic versus open treatment of Bankart lesion of the shoulder: A prospective randomized study.
        Arthroscopy. 2004; 20: 456-462
        • Mohtadi N.G.
        • Bitar I.J.
        • Sasyniuk T.M.
        • Hollinshead R.M.
        • Harper W.P.
        Arthroscopic versus open repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability: A meta-analysis.
        Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 652-658
        • Miura K.
        • Tsuda E.
        • Tohyama H.
        • et al.
        Can arthroscopic Bankart repairs using suture anchors restore equivalent stability to open repairs in the management of traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation? A meta-analysis.
        J Orthop Sci. 2018; 23: 935-941
        • Burkhart S.S.
        • De Beer J.F.
        Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: Significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion.
        Arthroscopy. 2000; 16: 677-694
        • Vermeulen A.E.
        • Landman E.B.M.
        • Veen J.D.E.
        • Nienhuis S.
        • Koorevaar C.T.
        Long-term clinical outcome of arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019; 28: e137-e143
        • van der Linde J.A.
        • van Kampen D.A.
        • Terwee C.B.
        • Dijksman L.M.
        • Kleinjan G.
        • Willems W.J.
        Long-term results after arthroscopic shoulder stabilization using suture anchors: An 8- to 10-year follow-up.
        Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 2396-2403
        • Rhee Y.G.
        • Ha J.H.
        • Cho N.S.
        Anterior shoulder stabilization in collision athletes: Arthroscopic versus open Bankart repair.
        Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34: 979-985
        • Karlsson J.
        • Magnusson L.
        • Ejerhed L.
        • Hultenheim I.
        • Lundin O.
        • Kartus J.
        Comparison of open and arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent shoulder dislocation in patients with a Bankart lesion.
        Am J Sports Med. 2001; 29: 538-542
      1. Itoi E, Cofield RH, Steinmann SP. Does the ‘bumper’ created during Bankart repair contribute to shoulder stability? In: Proceedings, 11th International Congress of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Edinburgh, 2010.

        • Neviaser T.J.
        The anterior labroligamentous periosteal sleeve avulsion lesion: A cause of anterior instability of the shoulder.
        Arthroscopy. 1993; 9: 17-21
        • Burkhart S.S.
        • Lo I.K.Y.
        • Brady P.C.
        Instability: Arthroscopy Barkart repair.
        Burkhart’s View of the Shoulder: A Cowboy’s Guide to Advanced Shoulder Arthroscopy. Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia2006: 217-272
        • Provencher M.T.
        • Bhatia S.
        • Ghodadra N.
        • et al.
        Recurrent shoulder instability: Current concepts for evaluation and management of glenoid bone loss.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92: 133-151
        • Kodali P.
        • Jones M.H.
        • Polster J.
        • Miniaci A.
        • Fening S.D.
        Accuracy of measurement of Hill-Sachs lesions with computed tomography.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20: 1328-1334
        • Whittle J.H.
        • Peters S.E.
        • Manzanero S.
        • Duke P.F.
        A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures used in shoulder instability research.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29: 381-391
        • Park I.
        • Lee J.H.
        • Hyun H.S.
        • Lee T.K.
        • Shin S.J.
        Minimal clinically important differences in Rowe and Western Ontario instability scores after arthroscopic repair of anterior shoulder instability.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27: 579-584
        • Lui P.
        • Zhang P.
        • Chan K.
        • Qin L.
        Biology and augmentation of tendon-bone insertion repair.
        J Orthop Surg Res. 2010; 21: 59
        • Weber E.M.
        • Wilk R.M.
        • Richmond J.C.
        Arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors.
        Oper Tech Orthop. 1991; 1: 194
        • Wolf E.M.
        Arthroscopic capsulolabral repair using suture anchors.
        Orthop Clin North Am. 1993; 24: 59-69
        • Bessière C.
        • Trojani C.
        • Carles M.
        • Mehta S.S.
        • Boileau P.
        The open Latarjet procedure is more reliable in terms of shoulder stability than arthroscopic Bankart repair.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472: 2345-2351
        • Omidi-Kashani F.
        • Sadri-Mahvelati E.
        • Mazlumi S.M.
        • Makhmalbaf H.
        Is Bristow-Latarjet operation effective for every recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation?.
        Arch Iran Med. 2008; 11: 270-273
        • Provencher M.T.
        Is it time to take a stand? When arthroscopic Bankart repair is no longer a viable option for anterior shoulder instability.
        Arthroscopy. 2018; 34: 2537-2540
        • Blonna D.
        • Bellato E.
        • Caranzano F.
        • Assom M.
        • Rossi R.
        • Castoldi F.
        Arthroscopic Bankart repair versus open Bristow-Latarjet for shoulder instability: A matched-pair multicentre study focused on return to sport.
        Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 3198-3205
        • Tjoumakaris F.P.
        • Bradley J.P.
        The rationale for an arthroscopic approach to shoulder stabilization.
        Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 1422-1433
        • Miyazaki A.N.
        • Fregoneze M.
        • Santos P.D.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the results from arthroscopic surgical treatment for traumatic anterior shoulder instability using suturing of the lesion at the opened margin of the glenoid cavity.
        Rev Bras Ortop. 2012; 47: 318-324
        • Zappia M.
        • Negri G.
        • Grassi S.
        • Pecoraro C.
        • Rotondo A.
        The CT-arthrography in the antero-inferior glenoid labral lesion: Pictorial presentation and diagnostic value.
        Int J Shoulder Surg. 2008; 2: 7-12