Advertisement

The Use of Elbow Arthroscopy for Management of the Pediatric Elbow: A Systematic Review of Indications and Outcomes

Published:February 01, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2021.01.047

      Purpose

      The purpose of this review was to systematically examine the literature surrounding elbow arthroscopy for pediatric patients and to assess indications, functional outcomes, and complication rates.

      Methods

      This systematic review was carried out in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. EMBASE, PubMed, and MEDLINE were searched for relevant literature from inception until December 2019, and studies were screened by 2 reviewers independently and in duplicate for those investigating elbow arthroscopy in a pediatric population (<18 years). Editorials, review articles, and case reports were excluded. Demographic data and data on surgical indications, treatment outcomes, and complications were recorded. A methodological quality assessment was performed for all included studies using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies.

      Results

      Overall, 19 studies, all of level IV evidence, were identified with a total of 492 patients (513 elbows). The patient population was 22.3% female with a mean age of 14.0 years (range, 4.0-15.7) and a mean follow-up time of 33.0 months (range, 7.4-96 months). Twelve studies (263 patients) exclusively recruited patients with osteochondritis dissecans (OCD), although other indications for elbow arthroscopy included arthrofibrosis (50 patients), elbow fracture (37 patients), medial ulnar collateral ligament injury (31 patients), and posterior impingement (17 patients). All 13 reporting studies showed a significant improvement in the elbow flexion-extension arc, and 4 of 5 that reported a functional outcome score before and after surgery demonstrating a significant improvement. Last, the overall complication rates ranged from 0% to 23.8%, with a total of 8 instances of neurological injury (5 ulnar, 2 radial, 1 unspecified), all being transient and resolving within 3 to 6 months.

      Conclusion

      Although elbow arthroscopy is primarily being performed for OCD in children and adolescents, there is evidence surrounding several other potential indications. Case series published to date have demonstrated significant improvements in functional outcomes and low rates of major complications.

      Level of Evidence

      Level IV, systematic review of level IV studies.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Steinmann S.P.
        Elbow arthroscopy: Where are we now?.
        Arthroscopy. 2007; 23: 1231-1236
        • Andrews J.R.
        • Carson W.
        Arthroscopy of the elbow.
        Arthroscopy. 1985; 1: 97-107
        • Guhl J.
        Arthroscopy and arthroscopic surgery of the elbow.
        Orthopedics. 1985; 8: 1290-1296
        • Plancher K.D.
        • Bishai S.K.
        Basics of elbow arthroscopy: Setup, portals, and technique.
        Tech Orthop. 2006; 21: 239-249
        • Adams J.E.
        • King G.J.W.
        • Steinmann S.P.
        • Cohen M.S.
        Elbow arthroscopy: indications, techniques, outcomes, and complications.
        Instr Course Lect. 2015; 22: 810-818
        • Savoie F.H.
        • VanSice W.
        • O’Brien M.J.
        Arthroscopic tennis elbow release.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19: 31-36
        • Yeoh K.M.
        • King G.J.W.
        • Faber K.J.
        • Glazebrook M.A.
        • Athwal G.S.
        Evidence-based indications for elbow arthroscopy.
        Arthroscopy. 2012; 28: 272-282
        • Kang H.J.
        • Park M.J.
        • Ahn J.H.
        • Lee S.H.
        Arthroscopic synovectomy for the rheumatoid elbow.
        Arthroscopy. 2010; 26: 1195-1202
        • Timmerman L.A.
        • Andrews J.R.
        • Andrews J.R.
        Arthroscopic treatment of posttraumatic elbow pain and stiffness.
        Am J Sports Med. 1994; 22: 230-235
        • Thomas Byrd J.W.
        Elbow arthroscopy for arthrofibrosis after type I radial head fractures.
        Arthroscopy. 1994; 10: 162-165
        • Kim S.J.
        • Kim H.K.
        • Lee J.W.
        Arthroscopy for limitation of motion of the elbow.
        Arthroscopy. 1995; 11: 680-683
        • Adams J.E.
        • Wolff L.H.
        • Merten S.M.
        • Steinmann S.P.
        Osteoarthritis of the elbow: Results of arthroscopic osteophyte resection and capsulectomy.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17: 126-131
        • O’Driscoll S.W.
        Elbow arthroscopy for loose bodies.
        Orthopedics. 1992; 15: 855-859
        • Koehler S.M.
        • Walsh A.
        • Lovy A.J.
        • Pruzansky J.S.
        • Shukla D.R.
        • Hausman M.R.
        Outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum and description of the technique.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24: 1607-1612
        • Micheli L.J.
        • Luke A.C.
        • Mintzer C.M.
        • Waters P.M.
        Elbow arthroscopy in the pediatric and adolescent population.
        Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 694-699
        • Pill S.G.
        • Ganley T.J.
        • Flynn J.M.
        • Gregg J.R.
        Osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum: Arthroscopic-assisted treatment of large, full-thickness defects in young patients.
        Arthroscopy. 2003; 19: 222-225
        • Kida Y.
        • Morihara T.
        • Kotoura Y.
        • et al.
        Prevalence and clinical characteristics of osteochondritis dissecans of the humeral capitellum among adolescent baseball players.
        Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 1963-1971
        • Jackson D.W.
        • Silvino N.
        • Reiman P.
        Osteochondritis in the female gymnast’s elbow.
        Arthroscopy. 1989; 5: 129-136
        • Matsuura T.
        • Suzue N.
        • Iwame T.
        • Nishio S.
        • Sairyo K.
        Prevalence of osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum in young baseball players: Results based on ultrasonographic findings.
        Orthop J Sport Med. 2014; 2 (2325967114545298)
        • Kajiyama S.
        • Muroi S.
        • Sugaya H.
        • et al.
        Osteochondritis dissecans of the humeral capitellum in young athletes: Comparison between baseball players and gymnasts.
        Orthop J Sport Med. 2017; 5 (2325967117692513)
        • Andelman S.M.
        • Meier K.M.
        • Walsh A.L.
        • Kim J.H.
        • Hausman M.R.
        Pediatric elbow arthroscopy: indications and safety.
        J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2017; 26: 1862-1866
        • Vavken P.
        • Muller A.M.
        • Camathias C.
        First 50 pediatric and adolescent elbow arthroscopies: Analysis of indications and complications.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 2016; 36: 400-404
        • Kelly E.W.
        • Morrey B.F.
        • O’Driscoll S.W.
        Complications of elbow arthroscopy.
        J Bone Jt Surg. 2001; 83-A: 25-34
        • Jones K.J.
        • Wiesel B.B.
        • Sankar W.N.
        • Ganley T.J.
        Arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum: Mid-term results in adolescent athletes.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 2010; 30: 8-13
        • Ruch D.S.
        • Poehling G.G.
        Anterior interosseus nerve injury following elbow arthroscopy.
        Arthroscopy. 1997; 13: 756-758
        • Dumonski M.L.
        • Arciero R.A.
        • Mazzocca A.D.
        Ulnar Nerve Palsy After Elbow Arthroscopy.
        Arthroscopy. 2006; 22: 577
        • Haapaniemi T.
        • Berggren M.
        • Adolfsson L.
        Complete transection of the median and radial nerves during arthroscopic release of post-traumatic elbow contracture.
        Arthroscopy. 1999; 15: 784-787
        • Thomas M.A.
        • Fast A.
        • Shapiro D.
        Radial nerve damage as a complication of elbow arthroscopy.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987; 215: 130-131
        • Camp C.L.
        • Degen R.M.
        • Sanchez-Sotelo J.
        • Altchek D.W.
        • Dines J.S.
        Basics of elbow arthroscopy part i: Surface anatomy, portals, and structures at risk.
        Arthrosc Tech. 2016; 5: e1339-e1343
        • Angelo R.L.
        Advances in elbow arthroscopy.
        Orthopedics. 1993; 16: 1037-1046
        • Bøe A.
        • Mølster A.
        [Arthroscopy of the elbow].
        Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1992; 112: 493-494
        • O’Driscoll S.W.
        • Morrey B.F.
        Arthroscopy of the elbow. Diagnostic and therapeutic benefits and hazards.
        J Bone Jt Surg. 1992; 74: 84-94
        • Moher D.
        • Shamseer L.
        • Clarke M.
        • et al.
        Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.
        Syst Rev. 2015; 4: 1-9
        • Slim K.
        • Nini E.
        • Forestier D.
        • Kwiatkowski F.
        • Panis Y.
        • Chipponi J.
        Methodological index for non-randomized studies (Minors): Development and validation of a new instrument.
        ANZ J Surg. 2003; 73: 712-716
        • Shah A.
        • Kay J.
        • Memon M.
        • et al.
        What makes suture anchor use safe in hip arthroscopy? A systematic review of techniques and safety profile.
        Arthroscopy. 2019; 35: 1280-1293.e1
        • Landis J.R.
        • Koch G.G.
        The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.
        Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159
        • Baumgarten T.E.
        • Andrews J.R.
        • Satterwhite Y.E.
        The arthroscopic classification and treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the capitellum.
        Am J Sports Med. 1998; 26: 520-523
        • Byrd J.W.T.
        • Jones K.S.
        Arthroscopic surgery for isolated capitellar osteochondritis dissecans in adolescent baseball players: Minimum three-year follow-up.
        Am J Sports Med. 2002; 30: 474-478
        • Hausman M.R.
        • Qureshi S.
        • Goldstein R.
        • et al.
        Arthroscopically-assisted treatment of pediatric lateral humeral condyle fractures.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 2007; 27: 739-742
        • Janarv P.M.
        • Hesser U.
        • Hirsch G.
        Osteochondral lesions in the radiocapitellar joint in the skeletally immature: Radiographic, MRI, and arthroscopic findings in 13 consecutive cases.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 1997; 17: 311-314
        • Tis J.E.
        • Edmonds E.W.
        • Bastrom T.
        • Chambers H.G.
        Short-term results of arthroscopic treatment of osteochondritis dissecans in skeletally immature patients.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 2012; 32: 226-231
        • Uchida S.
        • Utsunomiya H.
        • Taketa T.
        • et al.
        Arthroscopic fragment fixation using hydroxyapatite/poly-l-lactate acid thread pins for treating elbow osteochondritis dissecans.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 1057-1065
        • Bojanić I.
        • Smoljanović T.
        • Dokuzović S.
        Osteochondritis dissecans of the elbow: Excellent results in teenage athletes treated by arthroscopic debridement and microfracture.
        Croat Med J. 2012; 53: 40-47
        • Miyake J.
        • Masatomi T.
        Arthroscopic debridement of the humeral capitellum for osteochondritis dissecans: Radiographic and clinical outcomes.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2011; 36: 1333-1338
        • Park J.Y.
        • Yoo H.Y.
        • Chung S.W.
        • et al.
        Valgus extension overload syndrome in adolescent baseball players: clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes.
        J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2016; 25: 2048-2056
        • Ruch D.S.
        • Cory J.W.
        • Poehling G.G.
        The arthroscopic management of osteochondritis dissecans of the adolescent elbow.
        Arthroscopy. 1998; 14: 797-803
        • Ueda Y.
        • Sugaya H.
        • Takahashi N.
        • et al.
        Arthroscopic fragment resection for capitellar osteochondritis dissecans in adolescent athletes: 5- to 12-year follow-up.
        Orthop J Sport Med. 2017; 5: 1-7
        • Takeba J.
        • Takahashi T.
        • Watanabe S.
        • et al.
        Short-term clinical results of arthroscopic osteochondral fixation for elbow osteochondritis dissecans in teenaged baseball players.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015; 24: 1749-1756
        • Matsuura T.
        • Iwame T.
        • Suzue N.
        • et al.
        Clinical outcome of arthroscopic treatment for posteromedial elbow impingement in adolescent baseball players.
        Arthroscopy. 2018; 34: 105-110
        • Vincent J.I.
        • King G.J.W.
        • Grewal R.
        Validity and sensitivity to change of patient-reported pain and disability measures for elbow pathologies.
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2013; 43: 263-274
        • Turchin D.C.
        • Beaton D.E.
        • Richards R.R.
        Validity of observer-based aggregate scoring systems as descriptors of elbow pain, function, and disability.
        J Bone Jt Surg. 1998; 80: 154-162
        • Franchignoni F.
        • Vercelli S.
        • Giordano A.
        • Sartorio F.
        • Bravini E.
        • Ferriero G.
        Minimal clinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (quickDASH).
        J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014; 44: 30-39
        • De Boer Y.A.
        • Hazes J.M.W.
        • Winia P.C.A.
        • Brand R.
        • Rozing P.M.
        Comparative responsiveness of four Elbow scoring instruments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
        J Rheumatol. 2001; 28: 2616-2623
        • Erickson B.J.
        • Chalmers P.N.
        • Cvetanovich G.L.
        • Frank R.M.
        • Romeo A.A.
        • Harris J.D.
        Quality and quantity of the elbow arthroscopy literature: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2016; 45: E290-E298
        • Degen R.M.
        • Conti M.S.
        • Camp C.L.
        • Altchek D.W.
        • Dines J.S.
        • Werner B.C.
        Epidemiology and disease burden of lateral epicondylitis in the USA: Analysis of 85,318 patients.
        HSS J. 2018; 14: 9-14
        • Kessler J.I.
        • Jacobs J.C.
        • Cannamela P.C.
        • Weiss J.M.
        • Shea K.G.
        Demographics and epidemiology of osteochondritis dissecans of the elbow among children and adolescents.
        Orthop J Sport Med. 2018; 6 (2325967118815846)
        • Gupta A.
        • Sunil T.M.
        Complete division of the posterior interosseous nerve after elbow arthroscopy: A case report.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004; 13: 566-567
        • Gay D.M.
        • Raphael B.S.
        • Weiland A.J.
        Revision arthroscopic contracture release in the elbow resulting in an ulnar nerve transection: A case report.
        J Bone Joint Surg. 2010; 92: 1246-1249
        • Carofino B.C.
        • Bishop A.T.
        • Spinner R.J.
        • Shin A.Y.
        Nerve injuries resulting from arthroscopic treatment of lateral epicondylitis: Report of 2 cases.
        J Hand Surg Am. 2012; 37: 1208-1210
        • Reddy A.S.
        • Kvitne R.S.
        • Yocum L.A.
        • ElAttrache N.S.
        • Glousman R.E.
        • Jobe F.W.
        Arthroscopy of the elbow: A long-term clinical review.
        Arthroscopy. 2000; 6: 588-594
        • Nelson G.N.
        • Wu T.
        • Galatz L.M.
        • Yamaguchi K.
        • Keener J.D.
        Elbow arthroscopy: Early complications and associated risk factors.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23: 273-278
        • Desai M.J.
        • Mithani S.K.
        • Lodha S.J.
        • Richard M.J.
        • Leversedge F.J.
        • Ruch D.S.
        Major peripheral nerve injuries after elbow arthroscopy.
        Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 999-1002
        • Heyworth B.
        • Cohen L.
        • von Heideken J.
        • Kocher M.S.
        • Iversen M.D.
        Validity and comprehensibility of outcome measures in children with shoulder and elbow disorders: creation of a new Pediatric and Adolescent Shoulder and Elbow Survey (Pedi-ASES).
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27: 1162-1171
        • Petty D.H.
        • Andrews J.R.
        • Fleisig G.S.
        • Cain E.L.
        Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction in high school baseball players: Clinical results and injury risk factors.
        Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32: 1158-1164
        • Marshall K.W.
        • Marshall D.L.
        • Busch M.T.
        • Williams J.P.
        Osteochondral lesions of the humeral trochlea in the young athlete.
        Skeletal Radiol. 2009; 38: 479-491