Establishing the Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Patient-Acceptable Symptomatic State After Arthroscopic Meniscal Repair and Associated Variables for Achievement


      To establish the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient-acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) after arthroscopic meniscal repair and identify the factors associated with achieving these outcomes.


      This is a retrospective study with prospectively collected data. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected from April 2017 to March 2020. All patients who underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair and completed both preoperative and postoperative PROMs were included in the analysis. MCID and PASS were calculated via half the standard deviation of the delta PRO change from baseline (for International Knee Documentation Committee Score [IKDC]) and via anchor-based methodology (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS] subscales).


      Sixty patients were included in the final analysis. The established MCID threshold values were 10.9 for IKDC, 12.3 for KOOS Symptoms, 11.8 for KOOS Pain, 11.4 for KOOS Activities of Daily Living (ADL), 16.7 for KOOS Sport, and 16.9 for KOOS Quality of Life (QoL). Postoperative scores greater than the following values corresponded to the PASS: 69.0 for IKDC, 75.0 for KOOS Symptoms, 80.6 for KOOS Pain, 92.7 for KOOS ADL, 80.0 for KOOS Sport, and 56.3 for KOOS QoL. Higher preoperative PRO scores were associated with lower likelihood of achieving MCID. Concomitant ligament procedures were associated with a higher likelihood of achieving PASS. Tears to both menisci were associated with decreased likelihood of achieving MCID and PASS for IKDC. Horizontal tears were associated with decreased likelihood of achieving PASS for IKDC and KOOS. Complex tears were associated with decreased likelihood of achieving MCID for KOOS.


      Clinically meaningful outcomes such as MCID and PASS were established for meniscal repair surgery using selected PROMs for IKDC and KOOS subscales. Variables more likely to be associated with achieving these outcomes include lower preoperative PRO score and concomitant ligament procedure, whereas higher preoperative PRO score, tearing of both medial and lateral menisci, and horizontal and complex tear classifications were associated with decreased likelihood of achieving these outcomes.

      Level of Evidence

      IV, retrospective case series.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Baker B.E.
        • Peckham A.C.
        • Pupparo F.
        • Sanborn J.C.
        Review of meniscal injury and associated sports.
        Am J Sports Med. 1985; 13: 1-4
        • Garrett Jr., W.E.
        • Swiontkowski M.F.
        • Weinstein J.N.
        • et al.
        American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Practice of the Orthopaedic Surgeon: Part-II, certification examination case mix.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 660-667
        • Tengrootenhuysen M.
        • Meermans G.
        • Pittoors K.
        • Van Riet R.
        • Victor J.
        Long-term outcome after meniscal repair.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011; 19: 236-241
        • Paxton E.S.
        • Stock M.V.
        • Brophy R.H.
        Meniscal repair versus partial meniscectomy: A systematic review comparing reoperation rates and clinical outcomes.
        Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 1275-1288
        • Dean C.S.
        • Chahla J.
        • Matheny L.M.
        • Mitchell J.J.
        • LaPrade R.F.
        Outcomes after biologically augmented isolated meniscal repair with marrow venting are comparable with those after meniscal repair with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 1341-1348
        • Westermann R.W.
        • Wright R.W.
        • Spindler K.P.
        • Huston L.J.
        • Group M.K.
        • Wolf B.R.
        Meniscal repair with concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Operative success and patient outcomes at 6-year follow-up.
        Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 2184-2192
        • Harris J.D.
        • Brand J.C.
        • Cote M.P.
        • Faucett S.C.
        • Dhawan A.
        Research pearls: The significance of statistics and perils of pooling. Part 1: Clinical versus statistical significance.
        Arthroscopy. 2017; 33: 1102-1112
        • Cvetanovich G.L.
        • Weber A.E.
        • Kuhns B.D.
        • et al.
        Clinically meaningful improvements after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in adolescent and young adult patients regardless of gender.
        J Pediatr Orthop. 2018; 38: 465-470
        • Kukkonen J.
        • Kauko T.
        • Vahlberg T.
        • Joukainen A.
        • Äärimaa V.
        Investigating minimal clinically important difference for Constant score in patients undergoing rotator cuff surgery.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22: 1650-1655
        • Chahal J.
        • Van Thiel G.S.
        • Mather Iii, R.C.
        • et al.
        The patient acceptable symptomatic state for the modified Harris Hip Score and Hip Outcome Score among patients undergoing surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 1844-1849
        • Simovitch R.
        • Flurin P.-H.
        • Wright T.
        • Zuckerman J.D.
        • Roche C.P.
        Quantifying success after total shoulder arthroplasty: The substantial clinical benefit.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27: 903-911
        • Nwachukwu B.U.
        • Chang B.
        • Fields K.
        • et al.
        Defining the “substantial clinical benefit” After arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.
        Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 1297-1303
        • Ayers D.C.
        • Zheng H.
        • Franklin P.D.
        Integrating patient-reported outcomes into orthopaedic clinical practice: Proof of concept from FORCE-TJR.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013; 471: 3419-3425
        • Katz N.P.
        • Paillard F.C.
        • Ekman E.
        Determining the clinical importance of treatment benefits for interventions for painful orthopedic conditions.
        J Orthop Surg Res. 2015; 10: 24
        • Nwachukwu B.U.
        • Chang B.
        • Voleti P.B.
        • et al.
        Preoperative short form health survey score is predictive of return to play and minimal clinically important difference at a minimum 2-year follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 2784-2790
        • Gowd A.K.
        • Lalehzarian S.P.
        • Liu J.N.
        • et al.
        Factors associated with clinically significant patient-reported outcomes after primary arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.
        Arthroscopy. 2019; 35: 1567-1575.e1563
        • Kim H.Y.
        Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test.
        Restor Dent Endod. 2017; 42: 152-155
        • Vittinghoff E.
        • McCulloch C.E.
        Relaxing the rule of ten events per variable in logistic and Cox regression.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2007; 165: 710-718
        • Paradowski P.T.
        • Witoński D.
        • Kęska R.
        • Roos E.M.
        Cross-cultural translation and measurement properties of the Polish version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013; 11: 107
        • Kim J.-R.
        • Kim B.-G.
        • Kim J.-W.
        • Lee J.-H.
        • Kim J.-H.
        Traumatic and non-traumatic isolated horizontal meniscal tears of the knee in patients less than 40 years of age.
        Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013; 23: 589-593
        • Beasley L.
        • Armfield R.D.
        • West R.
        • Irrgang J.
        • Gilbert M.
        • Harner C.D.
        Medial meniscus root tears: An unsolved problem—demographic, radiographic, and arthroscopic findings.
        Pittsburgh Orthop J. 2005; 16: 155
        • Jones A.O.
        • Houang M.T.W.
        • Low R.S.
        • Wood D.G.
        Medial meniscus posterior root attachment injury and degeneration: MRI findings.
        Australasian Radiol. 2006; 50: 306-313