Anchor Arthropathy of the Shoulder Joint After Instability Repair: Outcomes Improve With Revision Surgery


      To report clinical and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in patients undergoing revision surgery after diagnosis of anchor-induced arthropathy.


      Patients who underwent revision arthroscopic shoulder surgery and were diagnosed with post-instability glenohumeral arthropathy performed from January 2006 to May 2018 were included in the current study. Patients were excluded if they underwent prior open shoulder procedures, if glenoid bone loss was present, or if prerevision imaging and records were incomplete or not available. Data included initial diagnosis and index procedure performed, presenting arthropathy symptoms including duration, exam findings before revision surgery, and surgical intervention. PROMs were prospectively collected before surgery and at minimum 2-year follow-up.


      Fourteen patients were included with a mean (± standard deviation) age at presentation of 35.2 ± 12.1 years (range 16 to 59). The follow-up rate was 86%, with a mean follow-up of 3.8 years (range 1.1 to 10.6). Mean time to development of arthropathy symptoms was 48.2 months (range <1 month to 13.8 years), all presenting with pain and decreased range of motion on exam. At time of revision surgery, all patients underwent either open or arthroscopic removal of previous implants, including anchors and suture material. Six patients underwent additional revision stabilization procedures, 1 underwent total shoulder arthroplasty, and 7 underwent arthroscopic intraarticular debridement, capsular release, and chondroplasty with or without microfracture. Pain significantly improved in 79% of patients (P = .05). Significant improvements in all PROMs were observed, including 12-item Short Form (43.8 to 54.8, P < .01); Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, shortened version (31.8 to 8.4, P < .01); Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (47.0 to 84.5, P < .05); and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (61.6 to 92.1, P < .01). Average external rotation significantly improved, from 31° ± 22° to 52° ± 24° (P = .02).


      Rapid intervention after diagnosis, through either revision arthroscopic or open debridement and stabilization, can lead to significant improvement in range of motion, pain, and overall patient function and satisfaction.

      Level of Evidence

      IV, retrospective case series.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Bonazza N.A.
        • Liu G.
        • Leslie D.L.
        • Dhawan A.
        Trends in surgical management of shoulder instability.
        Orthop J Sports Med. 2017; 5 (2325967117712476)
        • Brown L.
        • Rothermel S.
        • Joshi R.
        • Dhawan A.
        Recurrent instability after arthroscopic Bankart reconstruction: A systematic review of surgical technical factors.
        Arthroscopy. 2017; 33: 2081-2092
        • Castagna A.
        • Delle Rose G.
        • Borroni M.
        • et al.
        Arthroscopic stabilization of the shoulder in adolescent athletes participating in overhead or contact sports.
        Arthroscopy. 2012; 28 (3093-15)
        • Plath J.E.
        • Aboalata M.
        • Seppel G.
        • et al.
        Prevalence of and risk factors for dislocation arthropathy: Radiological long-term outcome of arthroscopic Bankart repair in 100 shoulders at an average 13-year follow-up.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 1084-1090
        • Kramer J.D.
        • Robinson S.
        • Hohn E.
        • Purviance C.
        • Wolf E.M.
        Fixation methods and implants in shoulder stabilization: A historical perspective.
        J Orthop. 2018; 15: 630-635
        • Kavaja L.
        • Pajarinen J.
        • Sinisaari I.
        • et al.
        Arthrosis of glenohumeral joint after arthroscopic Bankart repair: A long-term follow-up of 13 years.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012; 21: 350-355
        • Athwal G.S.
        • Shridharani S.M.
        • O’Driscoll S.W.
        Osteolysis and arthropathy of the shoulder after use of bioabsorbable knotless suture anchors. A report of four cases.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88: 1840-1845
        • Boden R.A.
        • Burgess E.
        • Enion D.
        • Srinivasan M.S.
        Use of bioabsorbable knotless suture anchors and associated accelerated shoulder arthropathy: Report of 3 cases.
        Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 1429-1433
        • Bailie D.S.
        • Ellenbecker T.S.
        Severe chondrolysis after shoulder arthroscopy: A case series.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18: 742-747
        • Solomon D.J.
        • Navaie M.
        • Stedje-Larsen E.T.
        • Smith J.C.
        • Provencher M.T.
        Glenohumeral chondrolysis after arthroscopy: A systematic review of potential contributors and causal pathways.
        Arthroscopy. 2009; 25: 1329-1342
        • Rhee K.J.
        • Kim K.C.
        • Shin H.D.
        • Kim Y.M.
        Revision using modified transglenoid reconstruction in recurred glenohumeral instability combined with anchor-induced arthropathy.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007; 15: 1494-1498
        • Rhee Y.G.
        • Lee D.H.
        • Chun I.H.
        • Bae S.C.
        Glenohumeral arthropathy after arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization.
        Arthroscopy. 2004; 20: 402-406
        • Ríos D.
        • Martetschlager F.
        • Millett P.J.
        Comprehensive arthroscopic management of shoulder osteoarthritis [in Spanish].
        Acta Ortop Mex. 2012; 26: 310-315
        • Thigpen C.A.
        • Shanley E.
        • Momaya A.M.
        • et al.
        Validity and responsiveness of the single alpha-numeric evaluation for shoulder patients.
        Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46: 3480-3485
        • Harris J.D.
        • Brand J.C.
        • Cote M.P.
        • Faucett S.C.
        • Dhawan A.
        Research pearls: The significance of statistics and perils of pooling. Part 1: Clinical versus statistical significance.
        Arthroscopy. 2017; 33: 1102-1112
        • Zuckerman J.D.
        • Matsen 3rd, F.A.
        Complications about the glenohumeral joint related to the use of screws and staples.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984; 66: 175-180
        • Jeong J.H.
        • Shin S.J.
        Arthroscopic removal of proud metallic suture anchors after Bankart repair.
        Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009; 129: 1109-1115
        • Buscayret F.
        • Edwards T.B.
        • Szabo I.
        • Adeleine P.
        • Coudane H.
        • Walch G.
        Glenohumeral arthrosis in anterior instability before and after surgical treatment: Incidence and contributing factors.
        Am J Sports Med. 2004; 32: 1165-1172
        • Franceschi F.
        • Papalia R.
        • Del Buono A.
        • Vasta S.
        • Maffulli N.
        • Denaro V.
        Glenohumeral osteoarthritis after arthroscopic Bankart repair for anterior instability.
        Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 1653-1659
        • Provencher M.T.
        • LeClere L.E.
        • Ghodadra N.
        • Solomon D.J.
        Postsurgical glenohumeral anchor arthropathy treated with a fresh distal tibia allograft to the glenoid and a fresh allograft to the humeral head.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010; 19: e6-e11
        • Sassmannshausen G.
        • Sukay M.
        • Mair S.D.
        Broken or dislodged poly-L-lactic acid bioabsorbable tacks in patients after SLAP lesion surgery.
        Arthroscopy. 2006; 22: 615-619