A Comparison of Two-Year Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Clinical Outcomes Using All-Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft With Femoral/Tibial Cortical Suspensory Fixation Versus Tibial Interference Screw Fixation

References

1. • Sanders T.L.
   • Maradit Kremers H.
   • Bryan A.J.
   • et al.
   Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: A 21-year population-based study.
   Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 1502-1507
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
2. • Budny J.
   • Fox J.
   • Rauh M.
   • Fineberg M.
   Emerging trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
   J Knee Surg. 2017; 30: 63-69
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
3. • Bowman E.N.
   • Limpisvasti O.
   • Cole B.J.
   • ElAttrache N.S.
   Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft preferences among orthopaedic surgeons.
   Arthroscopy. 2021; 37: 1559-1566
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
4. • Tomita F.
   • Yasuda K.
   • Mikami S.
   • Sakai T.
   • Yamazaki S.
   • Tohyama H.
   Comparisons of intraosseous graft healing between the doubled flexor tendon graft and the bone-patellar tendon-bone graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
   Arthroscopy. 2001; 17: 461-476
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
5. • Papageorgiou C.D.
   • Ma C.B.
   • Abramowitch S.D.
   • Clineff T.D.
   • Woo S.L.
   A multidisciplinary study of the healing of an intraarticular anterior cruciate ligament graft in a goat model.
   Am J Sports Med. 2001; 29: 620-626
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
6. • Ahlden M.
   • Kartus J.
   • Ejerhed L.
   • Karlsson J.
   • Sernert N.
   Knee laxity measurements after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, using either bone-patellar-tendon-bone or hamstring tendon autografts, with special emphasis on comparison over time.
   Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009; 17: 1117-1124
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
7. • Samuelsen B.T.
   • Webster K.E.
   • Johnson N.R.
   • Hewett T.E.
   • Krych A.J.
   Hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction: Is there a difference in graft failure rate? a meta-analysis of 47,613 patients.
   Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017; 475: 2459-2468
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
8. • Perez J.R.
   • Emerson C.P.
   • Barrera C.M.
   • et al.
   Patient-reported knee outcome scores with soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft are similar to bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft at minimum 2-year follow-up: A retrospective single-center cohort study in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery.
   Orthop J Sports Med. 2019; 7 (2325967119890063)
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
9. • Stein D.A.
   • Hunt S.A.
   • Rosen J.E.
   • Sherman O.H.
   The incidence and outcome of patella fractures after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
   Arthroscopy. 2002; 18: 578-583
   View in Article

   • Google Scholar
10. • Cruz C.A.
    • Goldberg D.
    • Wake J.
    • et al.
    Comparing bone-tendon autograft with bone-tendon-bone autograft for ACL reconstruction: A matched-cohort analysis.
    Orthop J Sports Med. 2020; 8 (2325967120970224)
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
11. • Lund B.
    • Nielsen T.
    • Fauno P.
    • Christiansen S.E.
    • Lind M.
    Is quadriceps tendon a better graft choice than patellar tendon? A prospective randomized study.
    Arthroscopy. 2014; 30: 593-598
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
12. • Rousseau R.
    • Labruyere C.
    • Kajetanek C.
    • Deschamps O.
    • Makridis K.G.
    • Djian P.
    Complications after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and their relation to the type of graft: A prospective study of 958 cases.
    Am J Sports Med. 2019; 47: 2543-2549
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
13. • Irvine J.N.
    • Arner J.W.
    • Thorhauer E.
    • et al.
    Is there a difference in graft motion for bone-tendon-bone and hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction at 6 weeks and 1 year?.
    Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 2599-2607
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
14. • Mouarbes D.
    • Dagneaux L.
    • Olivier M.
    • et al.
    Lower donor-site morbidity using QT autografts for ACL reconstruction.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 28: 2558-2566
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
15. • Riaz O.
    • Aqil A.
    • Mannan A.
    • et al.
    Quadriceps tendon-bone or patellar tendon-bone autografts when reconstructing the anterior cruciate ligament: A meta-analysis.
    Clin J Sport Med. 2018; 28: 316-324
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
16. • Mouarbes D.
    • Menetrey J.
    • Marot V.
    • Courtot L.
    • Berard E.
    • Cavaignac E.
    Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes for quadriceps tendon autograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring-tendon autografts.
    Am J Sports Med. 2019; 47: 3531-3540
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
17. • Shani R.H.
    • Umpierez E.
    • Nasert M.
    • Hiza E.A.
    • Xerogeanes J.
    Biomechanical comparison of quadriceps and patellar tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 71-75
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
18. • Xerogeanes J.W.
    • Mitchell P.M.
    • Karasev P.A.
    • Kolesov I.A.
    • Romine S.E.
    Anatomic and morphological evaluation of the quadriceps tendon using 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging reconstruction: Applications for anterior cruciate ligament autograft choice and procurement.
    Am J Sports Med. 2013; 41: 2392-2399
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
19. • Crum R.J.
    • de Sa D.
    • Kanakamedala A.C.
    • Obioha O.A.
    • Lesniak B.P.
    • Musahl V.
    Aperture and Suspensory Fixation equally efficacious for quadriceps tendon graft fixation in primary ACL reconstruction: A systematic review.
    J Knee Surg. 2020; 33: 704-721
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
20. • Kanakamedala A.C.
    • de Sa D.
    • Obioha O.A.
    • et al.
    No difference between full thickness and partial thickness quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 27: 105-116
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
21. • Xerogeanes J.W.
    Quadriceps tendon graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: The graft of the future!.
    Arthroscopy. 2019; 35: 696-697
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
22. • Lippe J.
    • Armstrong A.
    • Fulkerson J.P.
    Anatomic guidelines for harvesting a quadriceps free tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Arthroscopy. 2012; 28: 980-984
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
23. • Figved W.
    • Grindem H.
    • Aaberg M.
    • Engebretsen L.
    Muscle strength measurements and functional outcome of an untreated complete distal rectus femoris muscle tear.
    BMJ Case Rep. 2014; 2014
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
24. • Galan H.
    • Escalante M.
    • Della Vedova F.
    • Slullitel D.
    All inside full thickness quadriceps tendon ACL reconstruction: Long term follow up results.
    J Exp Orthop. 2020; 7: 13
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
25. • Sheean A.J.
    • Musahl V.
    • Slone H.S.
    • et al.
    Quadriceps tendon autograft for arthroscopic knee ligament reconstruction: Use it now, use it often.
    Br J Sports Med. 2018; 52: 698-701
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
26. • Diermeier T.
    • Tisherman R.
    • Hughes J.
    • et al.
    Quadriceps tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 28: 2644-2656
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
27. • Slone H.S.
    • Ashford W.B.
    • Xerogeanes J.W.
    Minimally invasive quadriceps tendon harvest and graft preparation for all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Arthrosc Tech. 2016; 5: e1049-e1056
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
28. • Sprowls G.R.
    • Robin B.N.
    The quad link technique for an all-soft-tissue quadriceps graft in minimally invasive, all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Arthrosc Tech. 2018; 7: e845-e852
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
29. • Colombet P.
    • Saffarini M.
    • Bouguennec N.
    Clinical and functional outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at a minimum of 2 years using adjustable suspensory fixation in both the femur and tibia: A prospective study.
    Orthop J Sports Med. 2018; 6 (2325967118804128)
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
30. • Schurz M.
    • Tiefenboeck T.M.
    • Winnisch M.
    • et al.
    Clinical and functional outcome of all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.
    Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 332-337
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
31. • Connaughton A.J.
    • Geeslin A.G.
    • Uggen C.W.
    All-inside ACL reconstruction: How does it compare to standard ACL reconstruction techniques?.
    J Orthop. 2017; 14: 241-246
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
32. • Collins N.J.
    • Misra D.
    • Felson D.T.
    • Crossley K.M.
    • Roos E.M.
    Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS).
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011; (63S208-228)
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
33. • Ebrahimzadeh M.H.
    • Makhmalbaf H.
    • Golhasani-Keshtan F.
    • Rabani S.
    • Birjandinejad A.
    The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Short Form: A validity and reliability study.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 23: 3163-3167
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
34. • Briggs K.K.
    • Lysholm J.
    • Tegner Y.
    • Rodkey W.G.
    • Kocher M.S.
    • Steadman J.R.
    The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later.
    Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 890-897
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
35. • Johnson J.L.
    • Irrgang J.J.
    • Risberg M.A.
    • Snyder-Mackler L.
    Comparing the responsiveness of the global rating scale with legacy knee outcome scores: A Delaware-Oslo cohort study.
    Am J Sports Med. 2020; (363546520924817)
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
36. • Harris J.D.
    • Brand J.C.
    • Cote M.P.
    • Faucett S.C.
    • Dhawan A.
    Research rearls: The Significance of statistics and perils of pooling. Part 1: Clinical versus statistical significance.
    Arthroscopy. 2017; 33: 1102-1112
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
37. • Irrgang J.J.
    • Anderson A.F.
    • Boland A.L.
    • et al.
    Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form.
    Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34: 1567-1573
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
38. • Geib T.M.
    • Shelton W.R.
    • Phelps R.A.
    • Clark L.
    Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon autograft: Intermediate-term outcome.
    Arthroscopy. 2009; 25: 1408-1414
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
39. • Chen C.H.
    • Chuang T.Y.
    • Wang K.C.
    • Chen W.J.
    • Shih C.H.
    Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft: Clinical outcome in 4-7 years.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006; 14: 1077-1085
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
40. • Crum R.J.
    • Kay J.
    • Lesniak B.P.
    • Getgood A.
    • Musahl V.
    • de Sa D.
    Bone versus all soft tissue quadriceps tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review.
    Arthroscopy. 2021; 37: 1040-1052
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
41. • Scully W.F.
    • Wilson D.J.
    • Arrington E.D.
    Central" quadriceps tendon harvest with patellar bone plug: Surgical technique revisited.
    Arthrosc Tech. 2013; 2: e427-e432
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
42. • Fu F.H.
    • Rabuck S.J.
    • West R.V.
    • Tashman S.
    • Irrgang J.J.
    Patellar fractures after the harvest of a quadriceps tendon autograft with a bone block: A case series.
    Orthop J Sports Med. 2019; 7 (2325967119829051)
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
43. • Lee S.
    • Seong S.C.
    • Jo C.H.
    • Han H.S.
    • An J.H.
    • Lee M.C.
    Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with use of autologous quadriceps tendon graft.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89: 116-126
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
44. • Pereira H.
    • Correlo V.M.
    • Silva-Correia J.
    • Oliveira J.M.
    • Reis R.L.
    • Espregueira-Mendes J.
    Migration of "bioabsorbable" screws in ACL repair. How much do we know? A systematic review.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 21: 986-994
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
45. • Fu C.W.
    • Chen W.C.
    • Lu Y.C.
    Is all-inside with suspensory cortical button fixation a superior technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020; 21: 445
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
46. • Browning 3rd, W.M.
    • Kluczynski M.A.
    • Curatolo C.
    • Marzo J.M.
    Suspensory versus aperture fixation of a quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis.
    Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 2418-2427
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
47. • Eysturoy N.H.
    • Nissen K.A.
    • Nielsen T.
    • Lind M.
    The influence of graft fixation methods on revision rates after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46: 524-530
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
48. • Domnick C.
    • Herbort M.
    • Raschke M.J.
    • et al.
    Anterior cruciate ligament soft tissue graft fixation in the elderly: Is there a reason to use interference screws? A human cadaver study.
    Arthroscopy. 2017; 33: 1694-1700
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
49. • Mayr R.
    • Smekal V.
    • Koidl C.
    • et al.
    ACL reconstruction with adjustable-length loop cortical button fixation results in less tibial tunnel widening compared with interference screw fixation.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 28: 1036-1044
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
50. • Monaco E.
    • Fabbri M.
    • Redler A.
    • et al.
    Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with greater tibial tunnel widening when using a bioabsorbable screw compared to an all-inside technique with suspensory fixation.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 27: 2577-2584
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
51. • Colombet P.
    • Graveleau N.
    • Jambou S.
    Incorporation of hamstring grafts within the tibial tunnel after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Magnetic resonance imaging of suspensory fixation versus interference screws.
    Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 2838-2845
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
52. • Devitt B.M.
    • Maes M.
    • Feller J.A.
    • Webster K.E.
    No long-term tunnel enlargement following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autograft hamstring tendon with dual suspensory fixation.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 28: 2157-2162
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
53. • Lubowitz J.H.
    • Schwartzberg R.
    • Smith P.
    Cortical suspensory button versus aperture interference screw fixation for knee anterior cruciate ligament soft-tissue allograft: A Prospective, randomized controlled trial.
    Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 1733-1739
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
54. • Erickson B.J.
    • Cvetanovich G.
    • Waliullah K.
    • et al.
    Two-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Orthopedics. 2016; 39: e456-e464
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
55. • Lui P.P.
    • Lee Y.W.
    • Mok T.Y.
    • Cheuk Y.C.
    Peri-tunnel bone loss: Does it affect early tendon graft to bone tunnel healing after ACL reconstruction?.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 23: 740-751
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
56. • Lubowitz J.H.
    • Schwartzberg R.
    • Smith P.
    Randomized controlled trial comparing all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a full tibial tunnel.
    Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 1195-1200
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
57. • Cavaignac E.
    • Coulin B.
    • Tscholl P.
    • Nik Mohd Fatmy N.
    • Duthon V.
    • Menetrey J.
    Is quadriceps tendon autograft a better choice than hamstring autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A comparative study with a mean follow-up of 3.6 years.
    Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 1326-1332
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
58. • Lee J.K.
    • Lee S.
    • Lee M.C.
    Outcomes of anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Bone-quadriceps tendon graft versus double-bundle hamstring tendon graft.
    Am J Sports Med. 2016; 44: 2323-2329
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
59. • Barie A.
    • Sprinckstub T.
    • Huber J.
    • Jaber A.
    Quadriceps tendon vs. patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction using a hardware-free press-fit fixation technique: Comparable stability, function and return-to-sport level but less donor site morbidity in athletes after 10 years.
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020; 140: 1465-1474
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
60. • Runer A.
    • Wierer G.
    • Herbst E.
    • et al.
    There is no difference between quadriceps- and hamstring tendon autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 2-year patient-reported outcome study.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 26: 605-614
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
61. • Guimarães M.V.
    • Junior L.H.
    • Terra D.L.
    Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with the central third of the quadriceps muscle tendon: Analysis of 10-year results.
    Rev Bras Ortop. 2015; 44: 306-312
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
62. • Kim S.J.
    • Jo S.B.
    • Kumar P.
    • Oh K.S.
    Comparison of single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadriceps tendon-bone autografts.
    Arthroscopy. 2009; 25: 70-77
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
63. • Pennock A.T.
    • Johnson K.P.
    • Turk R.D.
    • et al.
    Transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the skeletally immature: Quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendon autograft.
    Orthop J Sports Med. 2019; 7 (2325967119872450)
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
64. • Akoto R.
    • Albers M.
    • Balke M.
    • Bouillon B.
    • Hoher J.
    ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon graft and press-fit fixation versus quadruple hamstring graft and interference screw fixation—a matched pair analysis after one year follow up.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20: 109
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
65. • Barie A.
    • Kopf M.
    • Jaber A.
    • et al.
    Long-term follow-up after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a press-fit quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018; 19: 368
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
66. • Gorschewsky O.
    • Klakow A.
    • Pütz A.
    • et al.
    Clinical comparison of the autologous quadriceps tendon (BQT) and the autologous patella tendon (BPTB) for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007; 15: 1284-1292
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
67. • Todor A.
    • Nistor D.V.
    • Caterev S.
    Clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with free quadriceps tendon autograft versus hamstring tendons autograft. A retrospective study with a minimal follow-up two years.
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019; 53: 180-183
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
68. • Schulz A.P.
    • Lange V.
    • Gille J.
    • et al.
    Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone plug-free quadriceps tendon autograft: Intermediate-term clinical outcome after 24-36 months.
    Open Access J Sports Med. 2013; 4: 243-249
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
69. • Gorschewsky O.
    • Stapf R.
    • Geiser L.
    • Geitner U.
    • Neumann W.
    Clinical comparison of fixation methods for patellar bone quadriceps tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Absorbable cross-pins versus absorbable screws.
    Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35: 2118-2125
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
70. • Kim S.J.
    • Lee S.K.
    • Choi C.H.
    • Kim S.H.
    • Kim S.H.
    • Jung M.
    Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for smoking patients.
    Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 166-172
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar

71. Horstmann, H., Petri, M., Tegtbur, U. et al. Quadriceps and hamstring tendon autografts in ACL reconstruction yield comparably good results in a prospective, randomized controlled trial [published online March 19, 2021]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03862-8.

    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
72. • Gagliardi A.G.
    • Carry P.M.
    • Parikh H.B.
    • Albright J.C.
    Outcomes of quadriceps tendon with patellar bone block anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in adolescent patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up.
    Am J Sports Med. 2020; 48: 93-98
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
73. • Kohl S.
    • Stutz C.
    • Decker S.
    • et al.
    Mid-term results of transphyseal anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in children and adolescents.
    Knee. 2014; 21: 80-85
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
74. • Lind M.
    • Nielsen T.G.
    • Soerensen O.G.
    • Mygind-Klavsen B.
    • Fauno P.
    Quadriceps tendon grafts does not cause patients to have inferior subjective outcome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction than do hamstring grafts: A 2-year prospective randomised controlled trial.
    Br J Sports Med. 2020; 54: 183-187
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
75. • Benea H.
    • d'Astorg H.
    • Klouche S.
    • Bauer T.
    • Tomoaia G.
    • Hardy P.
    Pain evaluation after all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and short term functional results of a prospective randomized study.
    Knee. 2014; 21: 102-106
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
76. • Volpi P.
    • Bait C.
    • Cervellin M.
    • et al.
    No difference at two years between all inside transtibial technique and traditional transtibial technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2014; 4: 95-99
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
77. • Conte E.J.
    • Hyatt A.E.
    • Gatt Jr., C.J.
    • Dhawan A.
    Hamstring autograft size can be predicted and is a potential risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure.
    Arthroscopy. 2014; 30: 882-890
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
78. • Howell S.M.
    • Clark J.A.
    Tibial tunnel placement in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions and graft impingement.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992; : 187-195
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
79. • Chevallier R.
    • Klouche S.
    • Gerometta A.
    • Bohu Y.
    • Herman S.
    • Lefevre N.
    Bioabsorbable screws, whatever the composition, can result in symptomatic intra-osseous tibial tunnel cysts after ACL reconstruction.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 27: 76-85
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
80. • Mayr R.
    • Smekal V.
    • Koidl C.
    • et al.
    Tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction with aperture screw fixation or all-inside reconstruction with suspensory cortical button fixation: Volumetric measurements on CT and MRI scans.
    Knee. 2017; 24: 1047-1054
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
81. • Baumfeld J.A.
    • Diduch D.R.
    • Rubino L.J.
    • et al.
    Tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft: A comparison between double cross-pin and suspensory graft fixation.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008; 16: 1108-1113
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
82. • Ahn H.W.
    • Seon J.K.
    • Song E.K.
    • Park C.J.
    • Lim H.A.
    Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcomes and second-look arthroscopic findings after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using fixed and adjustable loop cortical suspension devices.
    Arthroscopy. 2019; 35: 1736-1742
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
83. • Mae T.
    • Kuroda S.
    • Matsumoto N.
    • et al.
    Migration of EndoButton after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 1528-1535
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
84. • Kawaguchi K.
    • Kuribayashi S.
    • Nakayama S.
    • Nakazato K.
    • Fukubayashi T.
    • Okinaga S.
    Lateral knee pain after outside-in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the TightRope RT.
    Knee Surg Relat Res. 2016; 28: 83-87
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
85. • Johnson J.S.
    • Smith S.D.
    • LaPrade C.M.
    • Turnbull T.L.
    • LaPrade R.F.
    • Wijdicks C.A.
    A biomechanical comparison of femoral cortical suspension devices for soft tissue anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction under high loads.
    Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 154-160
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
86. • Noonan B.C.
    • Dines J.S.
    • Allen A.A.
    • Altchek D.W.
    • Bedi A.
    Biomechanical evaluation of an adjustable loop suspensory anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction fixation device: the value of retensioning and knot tying.
    Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 2050-2059
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
87. • Gamboa J.T.
    • Shin E.C.
    • Pathare N.P.
    • McGahan P.J.
    • Chen J.L.
    Graft retensioning technique using an adjustable-loop fixation device in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Arthrosc Tech. 2018; 7: e185-e191
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
88. • O'Brien D.F.
    • Fones L.
    • Stoj V.
    • Edgar C.
    • Coyner K.
    • Arciero R.A.
    Confirming proper button deployment of suspensory fixation during ACL reconstruction.
    Orthop J Sports Med. 2021; 9 (2325967120974349)
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
89. • Kang S.G.
    • Lee Y.S.
    Arthroscopic control for safe and secure seating of suspensory devices for femoral fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using three different techniques.
    Knee Surg Relat Res. 2017; 29: 33-38
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
90. • Slone H.S.
    • Romine S.E.
    • Premkumar A.
    • Xerogeanes J.W.
    Quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A comprehensive review of current literature and systematic review of clinical results.
    Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 541-554
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
91. • Lind M.
    • Strauss M.J.
    • Nielsen T.
    • Engebretsen L.
    Low surgical routine increases revision rates after quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Results from the Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry.
    Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 29: 1880-1886
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar

92. Hunnicutt JL, Xerogeanes JW, Tsai LC, et al. Terminal knee extension deficit and female sex predict poorer quadriceps strength following ACL reconstruction using all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon autografts [published online November 11, 2020]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi: 10.1007/s00167-020-06351-4.

    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
93. • Bierke S.
    • Abdelativ Y.
    • Hees T.
    • et al.
    Risk of arthrofibrosis in anatomical anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: The role of timing and meniscus suture.
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021; 141: 743-750
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
94. • Mayr H.O.
    • Brandt C.M.
    • Weig T.
    • et al.
    Long-term results of arthroscopic arthrolysis for arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Arthroscopy. 2017; 33: 408-414
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
95. • Samitier G.
    • Marcano A.I.
    • Alentorn-Geli E.
    • Cugat R.
    • Farmer K.W.
    • Moser M.W.
    Failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
    Arch Bone Joint Surg. 2015; 3: 220-240
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
96. • Hyder N.B.S.
    • Sefton G.
    • Swann A.C.
    Correlation between Arthrometric evaluation fo knees using KT 1000 and Telos stress radiography and functional outcome following ACL reconstruction.
    Knee. 1997; 4: 121-124
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar
97. • Wiertsema S.H.
    • van Hooff H.J.
    • Migchelsen L.A.
    • Steultjens M.P.
    Reliability of the KT1000 arthrometer and the Lachman test in patients with an ACL rupture.
    Knee. 2008; 15: 107-110
    View in Article

    • Google Scholar