Knotted Transosseous-Equivalent Technique for Rotator Cuff Repair Shows Superior Biomechanical Properties Compared With a Knotless Technique: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Published:October 01, 2021DOI:


      To compare the biomechanical properties of the knotted versus knotless transosseous-equivalent (TOE) techniques for rotator cuff repair (RCR).


      A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies that compared the biomechanical properties of knotted and knotless TOE RCR techniques. The search phrase used was as follows: (Double Row) AND (rotator cuff) AND (repair) AND (biomechanical). Evaluated properties included ultimate load to failure, cyclic displacement, stiffness, footprint characteristics, and failure mode.


      Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, including a total of 67 specimens in each group. Of 6 studies reporting on ultimate load to failure, 4 found tendons repaired with the knotted TOE technique to experience significantly higher ultimate load to failure compared with knotless TOE repairs (knotted range, 323.5-549.0 N; knotless range, 166.0-416.8 N; P < .05). Of 6 studies reporting on failure stiffness, 2 found knotted TOE repairs to have significantly higher failure stiffness compared with knotless TOE repairs (knotted range, 30.0-241.8 N/mm; knotless range, 28.0-182.5 N/mm; P < .05), whereas 1 study found significantly higher failure stiffness in knotless TOE repairs compared with knotted TOE repairs (P = .039). Cyclic gap formation favored the knotted TOE group in 2 of 3 studies (knotted range, 0.6-5.2 mm; knotless range, 0.4-9.1 mm; P < .05). The most common mode of failure in both groups was suture tendon tear.


      On the basis of the included cadaveric studies, rotator cuff tendons repaired via the knotted TOE technique display superior time-zero biomechanical properties, including greater ultimate load to failure, compared with rotator cuffs repaired via the knotless TOE technique. Suture tearing through the tendon remains a common failure method for both techniques.

      Clinical Relevance

      The results of this systematic review provide helpful insight into the biomechanical differences between 2 popular techniques for RCR. Although these results should be carefully considered by surgeons who are using either of these techniques in the operating room, they should not be mistaken for direct clinical applicability because cadaveric studies may not directly correlate to clinical outcomes.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Bishop M.E.
        • MacLeod R.
        • Tjoumakaris F.P.
        • et al.
        Biomechanical and clinical comparison of suture techniques in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair.
        JBJS Rev. 2017; 5: e3
        • Burns K.A.
        • Robbins L.
        • LeMarr A.R.
        • Childress A.L.
        • Morton D.J.
        • Wilson M.L.
        Rotator cuff repair with knotless technique is quicker and more cost-effective than knotted technique.
        Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2019; 1: e123-e130
        • Kummer F.J.
        • Hahn M.
        • Day M.
        • Meislin R.J.
        • Jazrawi L.M.
        A laboratory comparison of a new arthroscopic transosseous rotator cuff repair to a double row transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair using suture anchors.
        Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013). 2013; 71: 128-131
        • Burkhart S.S.
        • Adams C.R.
        • Burkhart S.S.
        • Schoolfield J.D.
        A biomechanical comparison of 2 techniques of footprint reconstruction for rotator cuff repair: The SwiveLock-FiberChain construct versus standard double-row repair.
        Arthroscopy. 2009; 25: 274-281
        • Kilcoyne K.G.
        • Guillaume S.G.
        • Hannan C.V.
        • Langdale E.R.
        • Belkoff S.M.
        • Srikumaran U.
        Anchored transosseous-equivalent versus anchorless transosseous rotator cuff repair: A biomechanical analysis in a cadaveric model.
        Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 2364-2371
        • Mall N.A.
        • Lee A.S.
        • Chahal J.
        • et al.
        Transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair: A systematic review on the biomechanical importance of tying the medial row.
        Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 377-386
        • Kunze K.N.
        • Rossi L.A.
        • Beletsky A.
        • Chahla J.
        Does the use of knotted versus knotless transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair technique influence the incidence of retears? A systematic review.
        Arthroscopy. 2020; 36: 1738-1746
        • Nagamoto H.
        • Yamamoto N.
        • Shiota Y.
        • Kawakami J.
        • Muraki T.
        • Itoi E.
        Transosseous-equivalent repair with and without medial row suture tying: A cadaveric study of infraspinatus tendon strain measurement.
        JSES Open Access. 2017; 1: 104-108
        • Gürpınar T.
        • Polat B.
        • Tekin S.B.
        • Esin Polat A.
        • Çarkçı E.
        • Öztürkmen Y.
        Comparison of early clinical results and re-tear rates of transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repairs with or without medial knots.
        Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi. 2019; 30: 193-200
        • Busfield B.T.
        • Glousman R.E.
        • McGarry M.H.
        • Tibone J.E.
        • Lee T.Q.
        A biomechanical comparison of 2 technical variations of double-row rotator cuff fixation: The importance of medial row knots.
        Am J Sports Med. 2008; 36: 901-906
        • Chu T.
        • McDonald E.
        • Tufaga M.
        • Kandemir U.
        • Buckley J.
        • Ma C.B.
        Comparison of completely knotless and hybrid double-row fixation systems: A biomechanical study.
        Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 479-485
        • Kaplan K.
        • ElAttrache N.S.
        • Vazquez O.
        • Chen Y.J.
        • Lee T.
        Knotless rotator cuff repair in an external rotation model: The importance of medial-row horizontal mattress sutures.
        Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 471-478
        • Mijares M.R.
        • Hiller A.
        • Alhandi A.
        • et al.
        Is it necessary to tie the medial row in rotator cuff repair double-row constructs when using suture tape?.
        J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020; 11: S378-S382
        • Pauzenberger L.
        • Heuberer P.R.
        • Dyrna F.
        • et al.
        Double-layer rotator cuff repair: Anatomic reconstruction of the superior capsule and rotator cuff improves biomechanical properties in repairs of delaminated rotator cuff tears.
        Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46: 3165-3173
        • Wu Z.
        • Zhang C.
        • Zhang P.
        • Chen T.
        • Chen S.
        • Chen J.
        Biomechanical comparison of modified suture bridge using rip-stop versus traditional suture bridge for rotator cuff repair.
        Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016: 9872643
        • Kim S.J.
        • Kim S.H.
        • Moon H.S.
        • Chun Y.M.
        Footprint contact area and interface pressure comparison between the knotless and knot-tying transosseous-equivalent technique for rotator cuff repair.
        Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 7-12
        • Park M.C.
        • Peterson A.B.
        • McGarry M.H.
        • Park C.J.
        • Lee T.Q.
        Knotless transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair improves biomechanical self-reinforcement without diminishing footprint contact compared with medial knotted repair.
        Arthroscopy. 2017; 33: 1473-1481
        • Higgins J.P.
        • Thomas J.
        • Chandler J.
        • et al.
        Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.1.0.
        The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen2020
        • Wilke J.
        • Krause F.
        • Niederer D.
        • et al.
        Appraising the methodological quality of cadaveric studies: Validation of the QUACS scale.
        J Anat. 2015; 226: 440-446
        • Sun Y.
        • Kwak J.M.
        • Kholinne E.
        • Tan J.
        • Koh K.H.
        • Jeon I.H.
        Nonabsorbable suture knot on the tendon affects rotator cuff healing: A comparative study of the knots on tendon and bone in a rat model of rotator cuff tear.
        Am J Sports Med. 2019; 47: 2809-2815
        • Burkhart S.S.
        • Johnson T.C.
        • Wirth M.A.
        • Athanasiou K.A.
        Cyclic loading of transosseous rotator cuff repairs: Tension overload as a possible cause of failure.
        Arthroscopy. 1997; 13: 172-176
        • Zheng N.
        • Harris H.W.
        • Andrews J.R.
        Failure analysis of rotator cuff repair: A comparison of three double-row techniques.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 1034-1042
        • Franceschi F.
        • Ruzzini L.
        • Longo U.G.
        • et al.
        Equivalent clinical results of arthroscopic single-row and double-row suture anchor repair for rotator cuff tears: A randomized controlled trial.
        Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35: 1254-1260
        • Millett P.J.
        • Warth R.J.
        • Dornan G.J.
        • Lee J.T.
        • Spiegl U.J.
        Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis of level I randomized clinical trials.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23: 586-597
        • Sugaya H.
        • Maeda K.
        • Matsuki K.
        • Moriishi J.
        Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: Single-row versus dual-row fixation.
        Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 1307-1316