Purpose
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Level of Evidence
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to ArthroscopyReferences
- Femoroacetabular impingement: current concepts in diagnosis and treatment.Orthopedics. 2015; 38: 185-199
- Current Concepts of Femoroacetabular Impingement.Radiol Clin North Am. 2018; 56: 965-982
- Imaging in hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: A comprehensive approach.Clin Sports Med. 2016; 35: 331-344
- Femoroacetabular impingement.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: 82-92
- Prevalence of femoral and acetabular version abnormalities in patients with symptomatic hip disease: A controlled study of 538 hips.Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46: 122-134
- Association between orientation and magnitude of femoral torsion and propensity for clinically meaningful improvement after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: A computed tomography analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49: 2466-2474
- Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic psoas lengthening: The effect of femoral version.Arthroscopy. 2012; 28: 965-971
- Radiographic prevalence of symphysis pubis abnormalities and clinical outcomes in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.Am J Sports Med. 2019; 47: 1467-1472
- Influence of acetabular labral tear length on outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome with capsular plication.Am J Sports Med. 2019; 47: 1145-1150
- Patients with unilateral femoroacetabular impingement syndrome have asymmetrical hip muscle cross-sectional area and compensatory muscle changes associated with preoperative pain level.Arthroscopy. 2019; 35: 1445-1453
- Radiographic prevalence of sacroiliac joint abnormalities and clinical outcomes in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.Arthroscopy. 2019; 35: 2598-2605 e2591
- Femoral version abnormalities significantly outweigh effect of cam impingement on hip internal rotation.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018; 100: 205-210
- Femoroacetabular impingement patients with decreased femoral version have different impingement locations and intra- and extraarticular anterior subspine FAI on 3D-CT-based impingement simulation: Implications for hip arthroscopy.Am J Sports Med. 2019; 47: 3120-3132
- The effect of femoral and acetabular version on clinical outcomes after arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement surgery.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97: 537-543
- Femoral anteversion.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987; 69: 1169-1176
- Accuracy and reliability of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging compared with true anatomic femoral version.J Pediatr Orthop. 2017; 37: e265-e270
- Assessment of femoral antetorsion with MRI: Comparison of oblique measurements to standard transverse measurements.Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 205: 130-135
- Differences in femoral torsion among various measurement methods increase in hips with excessive femoral torsion.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019; 477: 1073-1083
- Significant differences in femoral torsion values depending on the CT measurement technique.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016; 136: 1259-1264
- Femoral version: Comparison among advanced imaging methods.J Orthop Res. 2018; 36: 1536-1542
- Improved outcomes after hip arthroscopic surgery in patients undergoing T-capsulotomy with complete repair versus partial repair for femoroacetabular impingement: A comparative matched-pair analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 2634-2642
- Routine complete capsular closure during hip arthroscopy.Arthrosc Tech. 2013; 2: e89-e94
- Contemporary hip capsular management and closure using a suture passing device.Arthrosc Tech. 2019; 8: e947-e952
- CT determination of femoral torsion.Am J Roentgenol. 1981; 137: 97-101
- A comparison of alternative methods of measuring femoral anteversion.J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998; 22: 610-614
- Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81: 1747-1770
- Axial oblique CT to assess femoral anteversion.Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194: 1230-1233
Cohen J. The Effect Size Index: D. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2 ed1988.
- Age and outcomes in hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: A comparison across 3 age groups.Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49: 82-89
- Use of younger patient age and greater anterior center-edge angle to predict the need for bilateral hip arthroscopy in patients with bilateral femoroacetabular impingement-related hip pain.Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49: 2110-2116
- Gender and age-specific differences observed in rates of achieving meaningful clinical outcomes 5-years after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.Arthroscopy. 2021; 37: 2488-2496 e2481
- Development and internal validation of supervised machine learning algorithms for predicting clinically significant functional improvement in a mixed population of primary hip arthroscopy.Arthroscopy. 2021; 37: 1488-1497
- The influence of body mass index on outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: Five-year results in 140 patients.Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49: 90-96
- The effect of postoperative opioid prescription refills on achieving meaningful clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.Arthroscopy. 2020; 36: 1599-1607
- Closed intramedullary derotational osteotomy and hip arthroscopy for cam femoroacetabular impingement from femoral retroversion.Arthrosc Tech. 2014; 3: e83-e88
- Femoral derotation osteotomy technique for excessive femoral anteversion.Arthrosc Tech. 2017; 6: e1405-e1410
- Femoral Derotational Osteotomies.Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018; 11: 272-279
- Is hip arthroscopy effective in patients with combined excessive femoral anteversion and borderline dysplasia? A match-controlled study.Am J Sports Med. 2019; 47: 123-130
- Femoral anteversion in the hip: comparison of measurement by computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and physical examination.Arthroscopy. 2012; 28: 619-627
- Evaluation of native femoral neck version and final stem version variability in patients with osteoarthritis undergoing robotically implanted total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34: 108-115
- CT reveals a high incidence of osseous abnormalities in hips with labral tears.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 469: 831-838
- Does Femoral Retroversion Adversely Affect Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome? A midterm analysis.Arthroscopy. 2019; 35: 3035-3046
- Passive hip range of motion predicts femoral torsion and acetabular version.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016; 98: 127-134
- Impact of the T2-weighted axial oblique MRI sequence in the assessment of peroneal tendons.Clin Radiol. 2020; 75: 642 e615-642 e623
- Comparison of standard hip MR arthrographic imaging planes and sequences for detection of arthroscopically proven labral tear.Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 192: 1397-1400
- Diagnostic performance of MRI for assessing parametrial invasion in cervical cancer: A head-to-head comparison between oblique and true axial T2-weighted images.Korean J Radiol. 2019; 20: 378-384
- Diminished femoral antetorsion syndrome: A cause of pain and osteoarthritis.J Pediatr Orthop. 1991; 11: 419-431
- Automated 3-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging allows for accurate evaluation of glenoid bone loss compared with 3-dimensional computed tomography.Arthroscopy. 2019; 35: 734-740
- 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging generates accurate 3D proximal femoral models: Surgical planning implications for femoroacetabular impingement.J Orthop Res. 2020; 38: 2050-2056
Guidetti M, Malloy P, Alter TD, et al. MRI- and CT-based metrics for the quantification of arthroscopic bone resections in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome [online ahead of print June 30, 2021]. J Orthop Res. doi: 10.1002/jor.25139.
Article Info
Publication History
Footnotes
The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: S.J.N. reports non-financial support from Allosource, Arthrex, Inc., Athletico, DJ Orthopaedics, Linvatec, Miomed, Smith & Nephew; other from American Orthopaedic Association , American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine, Arthroscopy Association of North America , and personal fees from Ossur, Springer, and Stryker. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.