Purpose
To provide an update of recent literature with a specialized focus on clinical outcomes
following arthroscopic revision Bankart repair (ARBR) by performing a systematic review
of all available literature published between 2013 and 2020.
Methods
A literature search reporting clinical outcomes after ARBR was performed. Criteria
for inclusion consisted of original studies; Level of Evidence of I–IV; studies focusing
on clinical outcomes after ARBR published between January 1, 2013, and January 4,
2021; studies reporting recurrent dislocation or instability rate after ARBR; reoperation/revision
following ARBR, return to sport rates following ARBR; and patient-reported outcomes.
The primary outcomes of interest were failure defined as recurrent instability or
dislocation, return to sport rates, and patient-reported outcomes at follow-up.
Results
A large proportion of patients undergoing arthroscopic revision Bankart repair were
male, ranging between 67.7% and 93.8%. Failure rate and return to sports rate ranged
between 6.1% and 46.8% and 25.9% and 88.3%, respectively, when patients with significant
or greater than 20% glenoid bone loss was excluded. Patient-reported outcome scores,
which included American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Simple Shoulder Test, and visual
analog scale, saw significant improvement over mean follow-up of ranging 21.64 to
60 months.
Conclusions
Both the failure rate and RTS rates after ARBR had a wide range, given the heterogeneity
of the studies included, which varied in patient selection criteria pertaining to
patients with greater than 20% glenoid bone. Although there have been advancements
in arthroscopic techniques and a trend favoring arthroscopic stabilization procedures,
there is a lack of consensus in recent literature for careful patient selection criteria
that would minimize failure rates and maximize RTS rates after ARBR.
Level of Evidence
Level IV, a systematic review of Level III-IV studies.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to ArthroscopyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Epidemiology of shoulder dislocations presenting to emergency departments in the United States.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92: 542-549
- Incidence of and risk factors for traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: An epidemiologic study in high-school rugby players.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014; 23: 1624-1630
- The incidence and characteristics of shoulder instability at the United States Military Academy.Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35: 1168-1173
- Anterior shoulder stabilization in collision athletes: arthroscopic versus open Bankart repair.Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34: 979-985
- Controversies in arthroscopic shoulder surgery: Arthroscopic versus open Bankart repair, thermal treatment of capsular tissue, acromioplasties—are they necessary?.Arthroscopy. 2003; 19: 224-228
- Arthroscopic versus open Bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability.Clin Sports Med. 2000; 19: 19-48
- A randomized clinical trial comparing open and arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent traumatic anterior shoulder instability: Two-year follow-up with disease-specific quality-of-life outcomes.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96: 353-360
- Comparison of time to recurrence of instability after open and arthroscopic Bankart repair techniques.Orthop J Sports Med. 2016; 4 (232596711665411)
- Arthroscopic versus open shoulder stabilization for recurrent anterior instability: A prospective randomized clinical trial.Am J Sports Med. 2006; 34: 1730-1737
- Arthroscopic versus open treatment of Bankart lesion of the shoulder: A prospective randomized study.Arthroscopy. 2004; 20: 456-462
- Treatment of Bankart lesions in traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder: A randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopy and open techniques.Arthroscopy. 2012; 28: 900-908
- A meta-analysis of open versus arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2010; 18: 1742-1747
- Arthroscopic versus open Bankart repair: Analysis of patient subjective outcome and cost.Arthroscopy. 2005; 21: 1219-1222
- Arthroscopic versus open Bankart repairs in recurrent anterior shoulder instability: A systematic review of the association between publication date and postoperative recurrent instability in systematic reviews.Arthroscopy. 2020; 36: 862-871
- Outcomes after revision anterior shoulder stabilization: A systematic review.Orthop J Sports Med. 2020; 8 (232596712092257)
- Revision arthroscopic Bankart repair: A systematic review of clinical outcomes.J Clin Med. 2020; 9: 3418
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement.Int J Surg. 2010; 8: 336-341
- Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): Development and validation of a new instrument.ANZ J Surg. 2003; 73: 712-716
- Outcomes of revision arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization in a military population: A prospective cohort study.J Surg Orthop Adv. 2019; 28: 189-195
- Back to sports after arthroscopic revision Bankart repair.Orthop J Sports Med. 2018; 6 (232596711875545)
- Rotator cuff muscular integrity after arthroscopic revision of a Bankart repair.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018; 138: 155-163
- Bankart versus Latarjet operation as a revision procedure after a failed arthroscopic Bankart repair.JSES Int. 2020; 4: 292-296
- Can arthroscopic revision surgery for shoulder instability be a fair option?.Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2014; 4: 226-231
- Outcomes of Bankart repairs using modern arthroscopic technique in an athletic population.Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 1263-1270
- Revision anterior glenohumeral instability: Is arthroscopic treatment an option?.JSES Int. 2020; 4: 287-291
- Does anchor insertion angle or placement of the suture anchor affect glenoid rim fracture occurrence after arthroscopic Bankart repair?.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020; 29: e124-e129
- Restoration of joint congruency and the glenoidal labrum after arthroscopic revision Bankart repair: A MRI match-paired analysis comparing primary Bankart repair and the uninjured labrum.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014; 134: 1121-1134
- Risk factors for failure of arthroscopic revision anterior shoulder stabilization.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018; 100: 1319-1325
- Clinical outcomes following revision anterior shoulder arthroscopic capsulolabral stabilization.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015; 135: 1553-1559
- Arthroscopic subscapularis Bankart technique as a salvage procedure for failed anterior shoulder stabilization.HSS J. 2014; 10: 73-78
- Revision arthroscopic Bankart repair in the military.Orthop J Sports Med. 2020; 8 (2325967120S0011)
- Epidemiology of primary anterior shoulder dislocation requiring closed reduction in Ontario, Canada.Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 442-450
- The epidemiology of shoulder dislocations in Oslo: The epidemiology of shoulder dislocations in Oslo.Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011; 21: e334-e340
- Incidence of shoulder dislocations in the UK, 1995–2015: a population-based cohort study.BMJ Open. 2017; 7e016112
- Revision arthroscopic Bankart repair.Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 1572-1578
- Recurrent instability after revision anterior shoulder stabilization surgery.Arthroscopy. 2014; 30: 372-381
- Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs.Arthroscopy. 2000; 16: 677-694
- Failure of operative treatment for glenohumeral instability: Etiology and management.Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 681-694
- Outcomes of arthroscopic anterior shoulder instability in the beach chair versus lateral decubitus position: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis.Arthroscopy. 2014; 30: 1349-1365
- Inferior suture anchor placement during arthroscopic Bankart repair: influence of portal placement and curved drill guide.Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42: 1182-1189
- Beach chair versus lateral decubitus position: differences in suture anchor position and number during arthroscopic anterior shoulder stabilization.Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49: 2020-2026
- The posterolateral portal: Optimizing anchor placement and labral repair at the inferior glenoid.Arthrosc Tech. 2013; 2: e201-e204
- Bankart repair using modern arthroscopic technique.Arthrosc Tech. 2017; 6: e863-e870
- Arthroscopic knotless, tensionable all-suture anchor Bankart repair.Arthrosc Tech. 2019; 8: e647-e653
Article Info
Publication History
Published online: April 07, 2022
Accepted:
March 15,
2022
Received:
October 6,
2021
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofFootnotes
The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: S.C.S. reports other from Lima USA, Medacta, and Wright Medial Technology, outside the submitted work. N.H. reports other from Tornier, outside the submitted work. J.E.F. reports other from Arthrex and Smith & Nephew , outside the submitted work. B.M.S. reports other from Nova Science Publishers, outside the submitted work. ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America
