Infographic| Volume 38, ISSUE 8, P2368-2369, August 2022

Download started.


All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction


      Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most commonly performed knee operations. An “all-inside” technique creates bone sockets for ACL graft passage, as opposed to more traditional full bone tunnels, and typically incorporates suspensory fixation instead of screw fixation to secure the graft. This technique may be indicated for any ACL reconstruction surgery, where adequate bone stock exists to drill sockets and to use cortical fixation. The technique may be used with all soft tissue, as well as bone plug ACL grafts and autograft hamstring or quadriceps tendon; most allograft tendon options may be performed with an all-inside technique. Advantages include anatomic tunnel/socket placement, decreased postoperative pain and swelling, minimal hardware, appropriate graft tensioning and retensioning, and circumferential graft to bone healing. Tips for successful all-inside surgery include matching graft diameter to socket diameter, drilling appropriate length sockets based on individual graft length, so as not to “bottom out” the graft and confirming cortical button fixation intraoperatively. Potential complications include graft-socket mismatch, full-tunnel reaming, and loss of cortical fixation. Multiple studies have shown the all-inside technique to have similar or superior biomechanical properties and clinical outcomes compared to the more traditional full-tunnel ACL reconstruction techniques.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Bhimani R.
        • Shahriarirad R.
        • Ranjbar K.
        • Erfani A.
        • Ashkani-Esfahani S.
        Transportal versus all-inside techniques of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review.
        J Orthop Surg Res. 2021; 16: 734
        • Greif D.N.
        • Shallop B.J.
        • Allegra P.R.
        • et al.
        A comparison of two-year anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction clinical outcomes using all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon autograft with femoral/tibial cortical suspsensory fixation versus tibial interference screw fixation.
        Arthroscopy. 2022; 38: 881-891
        • Lubowitz J.H.
        • Ahmad C.S.
        • Anderson K.
        All-inside anterior cruciate ligament graft-link technique: Second-generation, no-incision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
        Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 717-727
        • Lubowitz J.H.
        • Schwartzberg R.
        • Smith P.
        Cortical suspensory button versus aperture interference screw fixation for knee anterior cruciate ligament soft-tissue allograft: A prospective, randomized controlled trial.
        Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 1733-1739
        • Monaco E.
        • Fabbri M.
        • Redler A.
        • et al.
        Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is associated with greater tibial tunnel widening when using a bioabsorable screw compared to an all-inside technique with suspensory fixation.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 27: 2577-2584
        • Schurz M.
        • Tiefenboeck T.M.
        • Winnisch M.
        • et al.
        Clinical and functional outcome of all-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up.
        Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 332-337
        • Schwartzberg R.S.
        Editorial Commentary: With appropriate anterior cruciate ligament graft selection, all-inside reconstruction results in excellent outcomes: Stay “inside” and be cognizant of hamstring graft diameter expectations in shorter patients.
        Arthroscopy. 2021; 37: 3149-3151