ABSTRACT
Purpose
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to ArthroscopyReferences
- Hip arthroscopy: Indications, outcomes and complications.Int J Surg. 2018; 54: 341-344https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.08.557
- Indications for Hip Arthroscopy.Sports Health. 2017; 9: 402-413https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738117712675
- Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement: Labrum, Cartilage, Osseous Deformity, and Capsule.Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017; 46: 23-27
- Diagnosis and treatment of labral tear.Chin Med J (Engl). 2019; 132: 211-219https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000020
O'Rourke RJ, El Bitar Y. Femoroacetabular Impingement. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; June 29, 2021.
- FAI morphology increases the risk for osteoarthritis in young people with a minimum follow-up of 25 years.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021; 141: 1175-1181https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03522-3
- What Is the Association Between Articular Cartilage Damage and Subsequent THA 20 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Labral Tears?.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019; 477 (PMID: 30998639): 1211-1220https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000717
- Tönnis stage 0 and 1 acetabular rim cartilage injuries: Incidence, grade, location and associated pre-surgical factors.Rev Esp Cir Ortop Traumatol. 2017; 61: 154-161https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recot.2016.11.004
- Inflammatory Response of Articular Cartilage to Femoroacetabular Impingement in the Hip.Am J Sports Med. 2020; 48: 1647-1656https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546520918804
- Correlation of Patient Symptoms With Labral and Articular Cartilage Damage in Femoroacetabular Impingement.Orthop J Sports Med. 2018; 62325967118778785https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118778785
- Predictors of Clinical Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy: 5-Year Follow-up Analysis of 1038 Patients.Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49: 112-120https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546520968896
- The outcome of arthroscopic repair of acetabular labral tears using the iHOT-33.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019; 20: 210https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2611-3
- Multicenter Arthroscopy of the Hip Outcomes Research Network. A short version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) for use in routine clinical practice.Arthroscopy. 2012; 28: 611-618https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.027
- Defining the Clinically Meaningful Outcomes for Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome at Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2020; 48: 901-907https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546520902736
- Impact of bone deformities and labral and cartilage lesions on early functional results of arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021; 107103069https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103069
- Multicenter Analysis of Midterm Clinical Outcomes of Arthroscopic Labral Repair in the Hip: Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46 (PMID: 29065275): 280-287https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517734180
- Arthroscopic Acetabular Labral Repair in Patients Over the Age of 60 Years: A Matched Case-Control Study.Arthroscopy. 2019; 35 (PMID: 31000389): 1406-1410https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.015
- Clinical and Radiographic Predictors of Acetabular Cartilage Lesions in Adolescents Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy.Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46 (PMID: 30325647): 3082-3089https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546518801848
- The Pattern of Acetabular Cartilage Wear Is Hip Morphology-dependent and Patient Demographic-dependent.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019; 477 (PMID: 30998630): 1021-1033https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000649
- Acetabular Chondral Lesions in Hip Arthroscopy: Relationships Between Grade, Topography, and Demographics.Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45 (PMID: 28590784): 2501-2506https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546517708192
Suarez-Ahedo C, Gui C, Rabe SM, Walsh JP, Chandrasekaran S, Domb BG. Relationship Between Age at Onset of Symptoms and Intraoperative Findings in Hip Arthroscopic Surgery. Orthop J Sports Med. 2017;5(11):2325967117737480. Published 2017 Nov 29. doi:10.1177/2325967117737480
Shapira J, Owens JS, Jimenez AE, et al. Dunn View Alpha Angle More Useful Than Femoral Head-Neck Offset to Predict Acetabular Cartilage Damage in Patients with FAIS Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 2021;S0749-8063(21)00819-7. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2021.08.039
Utsunomiya H, Briggs KK, Dornan GJ, Bolia IK, Locks R, Philippon MJ. Predicting Severe Cartilage Damage in the Hip: A Model Using Patient-Specific Data From 2,396 Hip Arthroscopies. Arthroscopy. 2019;35(7):2051-2060.e13. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2019.02.033. PMID: 31208918
- Predictors of Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.Orthop J Sports Med. 2019; 7 (2325967119848982)https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967119848982
- Can hip arthroscopy in the presence of arthritis delay the need for hip arthroplasty?.J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017; 4: 3-8https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnw050
- Preoperative risk factors in hip arthroscopy.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 29: 1502-1509https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06484-0
- Patient-related risk factors associated with less favourable outcomes following hip arthroscopy.Bone Joint J. 2020; 102-B: 822-831https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B7.BJJ-2020-0031.R1
- Acetabular microfracture in hip arthroscopy: clinical outcomes with minimum 5-year follow-up.Hip Int. 2018; 28: 649-656https://doi.org/10.1177/1120700018760263
Hevesi M, Bernard C, Hartigan DE, Levy BA, Domb BG, Krych AJ. Is Microfracture Necessary? Acetabular Chondrolabral Debridement/Abrasion Demonstrates Similar Outcomes and Survival to Microfracture in Hip Arthroscopy: A Multicenter Analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2019 Jun;47(7):1670-1678. doi: 10.1177/0363546519845346. Epub 2019 May 15. PMID: 31091140.
Article Info
Publication History
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofFootnotes
IRB: Piedmont Healthcare IRB: Atlanta, GA
Presented at: American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine-Arthroscopy Association of North America 2021 Annual Meeting
Author Contributions:
1. Dominic S. Carreira, M.D. acted as the primary contributor to the conception and design of the current study. He is one of the five surgeons who contributed data for analysis. He played a key role in revising the manuscript, approved the final submission and agrees to be responsible for all aspects of the work.
2. Daniel B. Shaw B.S. assisted with the design of the project and the acquisition and presentation of the data. He is the primary drafter of the manuscript and approved the final submission. He agrees to be responsible for all aspects of the work.
3. Thomas Ueland B.S. assisted with the design of the project and the acquisition and presentation of the data. He is largely responsible for drafting the Methods and Results sections of the manuscript. He approved the final submission and agrees to be responsible for all aspects of the work.
4. Andrew B. Wolff M.D. assisted with the conception of the project and was in charge of acquiring data from his patients. He is one of the five surgeons who contributed data for analysis. He played a key role in revising the manuscript, approved the final submission and agrees to be responsible for all aspects of the work.
5. John J. Christoforetti M.D. assisted with the conception of the project and acquired the data from his patients. He is one of the five surgeons who contributed data for analysis. He played a key role in revising the manuscript, approved the final submission and agrees to be responsible for all aspects of the work.
6. John P. Salvo M.D. assisted with the conception of the project and acquired the data from his patients. He is one of the five surgeons who contributed data for analysis. He played a key role in revising the manuscript, approved the final submission and agrees to be responsible for all aspects of the work.
7. Benjamin Kivlan Ph.D. assisted with the conception of the project and was the author who was primarily responsible for data analysis. He played a key role in revising the manuscript, approved the final submission and agrees to be responsible for all aspects of the work.
8. Dean Matsuda M.D. assisted with the conception of the project and acquired the data from his patients. He is one of the five surgeons who contributed data for analysis. He played a key role in revising the manuscript, approved the final submission and agrees to be responsible for all aspects of the work.
Level of Evidence: III - Retrospective Comparative Cohort
