Purpose
The primary purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on intraoperative
findings during endoscopic treatment for greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS).
Secondary outcomes were preoperative imaging findings and postoperative functional
outcome measures.
Methods
Medline, PubMED, and Embase databases were searched from inception (1946, 1966, and
1974, respectively), to July 15, 2021, for records reporting intraoperative findings
during endoscopic surgery for GTPS. Studies of Level I-IV evidence were eligible.
All studies were assessed for quality using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized
Studies (MINORS) score.
Results
Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Most patients underwent endoscopic greater
trochanteric bursectomy with repair of the gluteal tendons. Intraoperative conditions
reported were gluteal tendon tears usually involving the gluteus medius tendon, labral
tears, and chondral lesions. Three studies reported an average of 9% of patients who
subsequently underwent conversion to total hip arthroplasty. Pain was assessed using
the visual analog scale, and functional outcome measures were measured using the modified
Harris Hip Score, Non-Arthritic Hip Score, Hip Outcome Score Sport-Specific subscale,
Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living subscale, and iHOT-12. Pain and functional
outcomes demonstrated significant improvement in nearly all the studies where they
were reported.
Conclusions
Patients who underwent endoscopic management of GTPS commonly underwent repair of
gluteal tendon tears, and in many cases had concomitant labral tears and chondral
lesions identified intraoperatively. There were low rates of adverse events, repair
failure, and revision surgery. Patient-reported functional outcomes were improved
at follow-up at least 1 year postoperatively.
Level of Evidence
IV, systematic review of level IV or better investigations
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to ArthroscopyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- Greater trochanteric pain syndrome.J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016; 24: 231-240
- Arthroscopic management of greater trochanter pain syndrome and abductor tears has demonstrated promising results in terms of improvement in pain scores and functional outcomes: a scoping review.Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 29: 2401-2407
- Non-surgical treatment as the first step to manage peritrochanteric space disorders.Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 29: 2417-2423
- Ultrasound definitions and findings in greater trochanteric pain syndrome: A systematic review.Ultrasound Med Biol. 2020; 46: 1584-1598
- Greater trochanteric pain syndrome: Evaluation and management of a wide spectrum of pathology.SAGE Open Med. 2021; 9: 1-12
- The management of greater trochanteric pain syndrome: A systematic literature review.J Orthop. 2016; 13: 15-28
- Managing and preventing hip pathology in trochanteric pain syndrome.J Musculoskelet Med. 2008; 25: 521-523
- Both open and endoscopic gluteal tendon repairs lead to functional improvement with similar failure rates: A systematic review.J ISAKOS. 2021; 6: 28-34
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.Syst Rev. 2015; 4: 148-160
- The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159-174
- Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): Development and validation of a new instrument.ANZ J Surg. 2003; 73: 712-716
- What makes suture anchor use safe in hip arthroscopy? A systematic review of techniques and safety profile.Arthroscopy. 2019; 35: 1280-1293
- A comparison of outcomes after endoscopic repair of partial- versus full-thickness tears of the gluteus medius tendon.Arthroscopy. 2021; 37: 2465-2472
- Endoscopic repair of gluteus medius tendon tears of the hip.Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 743-747
- Endoscopic repair of full-thickness abductor tendon tears: Surgical technique and outcome at minimum of 1-year follow-up.Arthroscopy. 2013; 29: 1941-1947
- Outcomes of endoscopic gluteus medius repair: Study of thirty-four patients with minimum two-year follow-up.J Bone Jt Surg. 2015; 97: 1340-1347
- The outcome of endoscopy for recalcitrant greater trochanteric pain syndrome.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016; 136: 1547-1554
- Endoscopic gluteus medius repair with concomitant arthroscopy for labral tears: A case series with minimum 5-Year outcomes.Arthroscopy. 2017; 33: 2159-2167
- Endoscopic repair of hip abductor tears: outcomes with two-year follow-up.J Hip Preserv Surg. 2017; 4: 80-84
- Endoscopic repair of partial-thickness undersurface tears of the abductor tendon: Clinical outcomes with minimum 2-year follow-up.Arthroscopy. 2018; 34: 1193-1199
- Endoscopic repair of full-thickness gluteus medius and minimus tears—Prospective study with a minimum 2-year follow-up.Arthroscopy. 2020; 36: 2160-2169
- Endoscopic transfer of gluteus maximus and tensor fasciae latae for massive gluteus medius tear: Preliminary results.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021; 107102927
- Arthroscopic repair of the hip abductor musculotendinous unit: The effect of microfracture on clinical outcomes.Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49: 1570-1577
- Mid-term outcomes of endoscopic gluteus medius repair with concomitant arthroscopic labral treatment: A propensity-matched controlled study.Arthroscopy. 2020; 36: 2856-2865
- Early results of endoscopic trochanter bursectomy.Int Orthop. 2004; 28: 218-221
- Intraoperative classification system yields favorable outcomes for patients treated surgically for greater trochanteric pain syndrome.Arthroscopy. 2021; 37: 2123-2136
- Defining minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state after isolated endoscopic gluteus medius repair.Am J Sports Med. 2019; 47: 3141-3147
- Clinical outcomes after endoscopic repair of gluteus medius tendon tear using a knotless technique with a 2-year minimum follow-up.Arthroscopy. 2020; 36: 2849-2855
- A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research.J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15: 155-163
- The modified resisted internal rotation test for detection of gluteal tendon tears.Arthrosc Tech. 2019; 8: e331-e334
- A review of surgical repair methods and patient outcomes for gluteal tendon tears.HIP Int. 2015; 25: 15-23
- From “periarthritis” to hip “rotator cuff” tears. Trochanteric tendinobursitis.Jt Bone Spine. 2006; 73: 344-348
- Application of the Goutallier/Fuchs rotator cuff classification to the evaluation of hip abductor tendon tears and the clinical correlation with outcome after repair.Arthroscopy. 2015; 31: 2145-2151
- Greater trochanteric pain syndrome: Epidemiology and associated factors.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88: 988-992
Looney AM, Bodendorfer BM, Donaldson ST, Browning RB, Chahla JA, Nho SJ. Influence of fatty infiltration on hip abductor repair outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med In press. doi:10.1177/03635465211027911.
Article Info
Publication History
Published online: July 07, 2022
Accepted:
June 23,
2022
Received:
February 7,
2022
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofFootnotes
The authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: O.R.A. reports being an educational consultant for the Speakers Bureau of ConMed. J.R.L. reports personal fees from Conmed Linvatec and Smith and Nephew, and royalties from Conmed Linvatec, during the conduct of the study. O.M.-P. reports personal fees from DePuy J&J and Cardinal Health and nonfinancial support from Heraeus, outside the submitted work. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
Identification
Copyright
© 2022 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America
