Original Article|Articles in Press

Defining Parameters for Surgical Correction and Hip Complications for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Results of an International Modified Delphi Study

Published:December 07, 2022DOI:


      To develop recommendations for clinical and radiographic criteria to help define the “acceptable” surgical correction of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and identify/define complications postoperatively.


      A 3-phase modified Delphi study was conducted involving a case-based survey; a Likert/multiple choice-based survey concerning radiographic and physical examination characteristics to help define FAIS correction, as well as the prevalence and definition of potential postoperative complications; and 2 consensus meetings.


      Of the 75 experts invited, 54 completed the Phase I survey, 50 completed the Phase II survey (72% and 67% response rate), and 50 participated in the Phase III consensus meetings. For both typical and atypical (complex) cases, there was consensus that fluoroscopy with multiple views and dynamic hip assessment should be used intraoperatively (96% and 100%, respectively). For typical FAIS cases, the Expert Panel agreed that Dunn lateral and anteroposterior radiographs were the most important radiographs to evaluate the hip postoperatively (88%, consensus). When asked about evaluating the correction of cam impingement postoperatively, 87% voted that they use subjective evaluation of the “sphericity” of the femoral head. In the case of focal and global pincer-type FAIS, there was consensus that the reduction or elimination of the crossover sign (84%) and lateral center-edge angle (91%) were important to inform the extent of the FAIS correction. There was consensus for recommending further investigation at 6 months postoperatively if hip pain had increased/plateaued (92% agreed); that additional investigation and treatment should occur between 6 and 12 months (90% agreed); and that a reoperation may be recommended at 12 months or later following this investigation period (89% agreed).


      This consensus project identified the importance of using fluoroscopy and dynamic hip assessment intraoperatively; Dunn lateral and anteroposterior view radiographs postoperatively; evaluating the “sphericity” of the femoral head for cam-type correction and the use of dynamic hip assessment; reducing/eliminating the crossover sign for focal pincer-type FAIS; evaluating the lateral center-edge angle for global pincer-type FAIS; and avoiding overcorrection of pincer-type FAIS. In cases in which postoperative hip pain increased/plateaued, further investigation and treatment is warranted between 6 and 12 months, and a reoperation may be recommended at a minimum of 12 months depending on the cause of the hip pain.

      Clinical Relevance

      Hip arthroscopy surgeons have yet to reach a firm agreement on what constitutes an “acceptable” or “good” surgery radiographically and how they can achieve desired clinical outcomes. Although this was a comprehensive effort, more study is needed to determine therapeutic thresholds that can be universally applied.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Ganz R.
        • Parvizi J.
        • Beck M.
        • Leunig M.
        • Nötzli H.
        • Siebenrock K.A.
        Femoroacetabular impingement: A cause for osteoarthritis of the hip.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003; 417: 112-120
        • Khan M.
        • Ayeni O.R.
        • Madden K.
        • et al.
        Femoroacetabular impingement: Have we hit a global tipping point in diagnosis and treatment? Results from the InterNational Femoroacetabular Impingement Optimal Care Update Survey (IN FOCUS).
        Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 779-787
        • Nasser R.
        • Domb B.
        Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement.
        EFFORT Open Rev. 2018; 3: 121-129
        • Griffin D.R.
        • Dickenson E.J.
        • O'Donnell J.
        • et al.
        The Warwick Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAI syndrome): An international consensus statement.
        Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50: 1169-1176
        • Reiman M.P.
        • Thorborg K.
        • Covington K.
        • Cook C.E.
        • Holmich P.
        Important clinical descriptors to include in the examination and assessment of patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: An international and multi-disciplinary Delphi survey.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017; 25: 1975-1986
        • Lynch T.S.
        • Minkara A.
        • Aoki S.
        • et al.
        Best practice guidelines for hip arthroscopy in femoroacetabular impingement: Results of a Delphi Process.
        J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020; 28: 81-89
        • Femoroacetabular Impingement Randomized Controlled Trial (FIRST) Investigators
        Osteochondroplasty and labral repair for the treatment of young adults with femoroacetabular impingement: A randomized controlled trial.
        Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49: 25-34
        • Griffin D.R.
        • Dickenson E.J.
        • Wall P.D.H.
        • et al.
        Hip arthroscopy versus best conservative care for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (UK FASHIoN): A multicenter randomized controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2018; : 3912225-3912235
        • Palmer A.J.R.
        • Gupta Ayyar
        • Fernquest S.
        • et al.
        Arthroscopic hip surgery compared with physiotherapy and activity modification for the treatment of symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement: Multicenter randomized controlled trial.
        BMJ. 2019; 364: I185
        • Yeung M.
        • Khan M.
        • Schreiber V.M.
        • et al.
        Global discrepancies in the diagnosis, surgical management, and investigation of femoroacetabular impingement.
        Arthroscopy. 2014; 30: 1625-1633
        • Reiman M.P.
        • Peters S.
        • Sylvain J.
        • Hagymasi S.
        • Ayeni O.R.
        Prevalence and consistency in surgical outcome reporting for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: A scoping review.
        Arthroscopy. 2018; 34: 1319-1328
        • Peters S.
        • Laing A.
        • Emerson C.
        • et al.
        Surgical criteria for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: A scoping review.
        Br J Sports Med. 2017; 51: 1605-1610
        • de Sa D.
        • Urquhart N.
        • Philippon M.
        • Ye J.E.
        • Simunovic N.
        • Ayeni O.R.
        Alpha angle correction in femoroacetabular impingement.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 22: 812-821
        • Mascarenhas V.V.
        • Rego P.
        • Dantas P.
        • et al.
        Can we discriminate symptomatic hip patients from asymptomatic volunteers based on anatomic predictors? A 3-dimensional magnetic resonance study on cam, pincer, and spinopelvic parameters.
        Am J Sports Med. 2018; 46: 3097-3110
        • Ayeni O.R.
        • Sansone M.
        • de Sa D.
        • et al.
        Femoro-acetabular impingement clinical research: Is a composite outcome the answer?.
        Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24: 295-301