Advertisement

Biceps Tenodesis in Patients Age 35 Years and Younger Yields Favorable Clinical Outcomes With Variable Rates of Return to Sport and Complications: A Systematic Review

Published:December 14, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2022.12.009

      Purpose

      To systematically evaluate reported clinical outcomes, return-to-sport (RTS) rates, and complications following biceps tenodesis in patients aged 35 years and younger and compare outcomes between overhead and nonoverhead athletes.

      Methods

      A literature search was performed by querying Scopus, EMBASE, and PubMed computerized databases from database inception through August 2022 in accordance with the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Studies that evaluated clinical outcomes following biceps tenodesis in patients aged 35 years or younger were included. Study quality was assessed via the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria. Clinical outcomes, RTS rates, and complications were aggregated.

      Results

      Nine studies from 2011 to 2022 comprising 161 patients (mean age, 25 years; range, 19.7-28.9 years) were included. At an average follow-up of 59 months, postoperative American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score ranged from 81.6 to 96 and the mean visual analog scale score ranged from 0 to 2.1. Mean overall RTS rate ranged from 35% to 100% for the entire patient cohort 35% to 86% among overhead athletes, and 46% to 100% among nonoverhead athletes. Among the overhead athletes, 24 were baseball pitchers. 17% to 100% able to return to sport at any level. Complications were reported in 0% to 19% of patients. 0 to 18% of patients underwent revision surgery.

      Conclusions

      Biceps tenodesis in patients 35 years of age and younger yields a wide variability in reported RTS rates, excellent clinical outcome scores, and low but variable reported rates of complications, reoperations, and failure.

      Level of Evidence

      IV; Systematic Review of Level III and IV studies.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Arthroscopy
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Morse K.W.
        • Eno J.J.
        • Altchek D.W.
        • Dines J.S.
        Injuries of the biceps and superior labral complex in overhead athletes.
        Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019; 12: 72-79
        • Friedman D.J.
        • Dunn J.C.
        • Higgins L.D.
        • Warner J.J.
        Proximal biceps tendon: Injuries and management.
        Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2008; 16: 162-169
        • Waterman B.R.
        Editorial Commentary: Subpectoral biceps tenodesis is a safe alternative to arthroscopic repair for unstable SLAP tear in the young athlete: Should we do the last operation first?.
        Arthroscopy. 2022; 38: 313-314
        • Provencher M.T.
        Editorial Commentary: The not so benign nature of an isolated SLAP repair.
        Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 1963-1964
        • Scheibel M.
        • Schröder R.J.
        • Chen J.
        • Bartsch M.
        Arthroscopic soft tissue tenodesis versus bony fixation anchor tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon.
        Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 1046-1052
        • Elser F.
        • Braun S.
        • Dewing C.B.
        • Giphart J.E.
        • Millett P.J.
        Anatomy, function, injuries, and treatment of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon.
        Arthroscopy. 2011; 27: 581-592
        • van Deurzen D.F.P.
        • Gurnani N.
        • Alta T.D.W.
        • Willems J.H.
        • Onstenk R.
        • van den Bekerom M.P.J.
        Suprapectoral versus subpectoral tenodesis for Long Head Biceps Brachii tendinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020; 106: 693-700
        • McDonald L.S.
        • Dewing C.B.
        • Shupe P.G.
        • Provencher M.T.
        Disorders of the proximal and distal aspects of the biceps muscle.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: 1235-1245
        • Boileau P.
        • Parratte S.
        • Chuinard C.
        • Roussanne Y.
        • Shia D.
        • Bicknell R.
        Arthroscopic treatment of isolated type II SLAP lesions: Biceps tenodesis as an alternative to reinsertion.
        Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37: 929-936
        • Werner B.C.
        • Brockmeier S.F.
        • Gwathmey F.W.
        Trends in long head biceps tenodesis.
        Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43: 570-578
        • Barlow J.D.
        • Abboud J.
        Surgical options for the young patient with glenohumeral arthritis.
        Int J Shoulder Surg. 2016; 10: 28-36
        • Griffin J.W.
        • Cvetanovich G.L.
        • Kim J.
        • et al.
        Biceps tenodesis is a viable option for management of proximal biceps injuries in patients less than 25 years of age.
        Arthroscopy. 2019; 35: 1036-1041
        • Chalmers P.N.
        • Erickson B.J.
        • Verma N.N.
        • D'Angelo J.
        • Romeo A.A.
        Incidence and return to play after biceps tenodesis in professional baseball players.
        Arthroscopy. 2018; 34: 747-751
        • Slim K.
        • Nini E.
        • Forestier D.
        • Kwiatkowski F.
        • Panis Y.
        • Chipponi J.
        Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): Development and validation of a new instrument.
        ANZ J Surg. 2003; 73: 712-716
        • Erickson B.J.
        • Chalmers P.N.
        • D'Angelo J.
        • et al.
        Update on performance and return to sport after biceps tenodesis in professional baseball players.
        Orthop J Sports Med. 2022; 1023259671221074732
        • Lacheta L.
        • Horan M.P.
        • Nolte P.C.
        • Goldenberg B.T.
        • Dekker T.J.
        • Millett P.J.
        SLAP repair versus subpectoral biceps tenodesis for isolated SLAP type 2 lesions in overhead athletes younger than 35 years: comparison of minimum 2-year outcomes.
        Orthop J Sports Med. 2022; 1023259671221105239
        • Parnes N.
        • Dunn J.C.
        • Czajkowski H.
        • DeFranco M.J.
        • Green C.K.
        • Scanaliato J.P.
        Biceps tenodesis as an attractive alternative to superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) repair for type II SLAP lesions in active-duty military patients younger than 35 years.
        Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49: 3945-3951
        • Patriota G.S.Q.A.
        • Belangero P.S.
        • Figueiredo E.A.
        • Lara P.H.S.
        • Roncetti R.
        • Ejnisman B.
        SLAP IV in overhead sports practice.
        Acta Ortop Bras. 2019; 27: 169-172
        • Tangari M.
        • Carbone S.
        • Gallo M.
        • Campi A.
        Long head of the biceps tendon rupture in professional wrestlers: Treatment with a mini-open tenodesis.
        J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20: 409-413
        • Hurley E.T.
        • Colasanti C.A.
        • Lorentz N.A.
        • et al.
        Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis may be an alternative to arthroscopic repair for SLAP tears in patients under 30.
        Arthroscopy. 2022; 38: 307-312
        • Lin B.J.
        • Ling D.I.
        • Calcei J.G.
        • Altchek D.W.
        • O'Brien S.J.
        • Dines J.S.
        Return to play after biceps tenodesis and transfer in a young, athletic population.
        Orthopedics. 2021; 44: e13-e18
        • Cools A.M.
        • Johansson F.R.
        • Borms D.
        • Maenhout A.
        Prevention of shoulder injuries in overhead athletes: A science-based approach.
        Braz J Phys Ther. 2015; 19: 331-339
        • Frantz T.L.
        • Shacklett A.G.
        • Martin A.S.
        • et al.
        Biceps tenodesis for superior labrum anterior-posterior tear in the overhead athlete: A systematic review.
        Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49: 522-528
        • Song Y.
        • Wu Z.
        • Wang M.
        • Liu S.
        • Cong R.
        • Tao K.
        Arthroscopic modified double-row biceps tenodesis versus labral repair for the treatment of isolated type II SLAP lesions in non-overhead athletes.
        Orthop Surg. 2022; 14: 1340-1349
        • Hong I.S.
        • Meade J.D.
        • Young B.L.
        • et al.
        Trends in repair vs. biceps tenodesis for superior labrum from anterior to posterior (SLAP) tear: An epidemiological study.
        Cureus. 2022; 14e27096
        • Cabarcas B.C.
        • Beletsky A.
        • Liu J.
        • et al.
        Short-term clinical and return-to-work outcomes after arthroscopic suprapectoral onlay biceps tenodesis with a single suture anchor.
        Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021; 3: e1065-e1076
        • Vap A.R.
        • Katthagen J.C.
        • Tahal D.S.
        • et al.
        Isolated biceps reflection pulley tears treated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis: Minimum 2-year outcomes.
        Arthroscopy. 2017; 33: 1788-1794
        • Deng Z.J.
        • Yin C.
        • Cusano J.
        • et al.
        Outcomes and complications after primary arthroscopic suprapectoral versus open subpectoral biceps tenodesis for superior labral anterior-posterior tears or biceps abnormalities: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Orthop J Sports Med. 2020; 82325967120945322