Abstract
Purpose
Methods
Results
Conclusions
Level of Evidence
Keywords
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to ArthroscopyReferences
- The evolution of ACL reconstruction over the last fifty years.Int Orthop. 2013; 37: 181-186
- Epidemiology of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery in Italy: A 15-Year Nationwide Registry Study.J Clin Med. 2021; : 10
- An Increasing Trend in the Number of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Korea: A Nationwide Epidemiologic Study.Clin Orthop Surg. 2022; 14: 220-226
- Increasing incidence of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 17-year population-based study.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;
- Increasing rates of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young Australians, 2000-2015.Med J Aust. 2018; 208: 354-358
- The Role of Patient Characteristics in the Success of Nonoperative Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries.Am J Sports Med. 2020; 48: 1657-1664
- Treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 28: 2390-2402
- Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2022; 50: 3425-3439
- Trauma and femoral tunnel position are the most common failure modes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 28: 3666-3675
- A Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Failure.Int J Sports Med. 2021; 42: 682-693
- Does revision ACL reconstruction measure up to primary surgery? A meta-analysis comparing patient-reported and clinician-reported outcomes, and radiographic results.Br J Sports Med. 2016; 50: 716-724
- Revision ACL reconstruction has higher incidence of 30-day hospital readmission, reoperation, and surgical complications relative to primary procedures.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30: 1605-1610
- Primary Versus Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Patient Demographics, Radiographic Findings, and Associated Lesions.Arthroscopy. 2018; 34: 695-703
- Prevalence and Incidence of Chondral and Meniscal Lesions in Patients Undergoing Primary and Subsequent Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Analysis of 213 Patients From the SANTI Group.Am J Sports Med. 2022; 50: 1798-1804
- Incidence and Healing Rates of Meniscal Tears in Patients Undergoing Repair During the First Stage of 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2019; 47: 3389-3395
- Outcomes After 1-Stage Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2017; 45: 1790-1798
- Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39: 199-217
- Two-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee Surg Relat Res. 2019; 31: 10
- Outcomes of 1- Versus 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49: 798-804
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.BMJ. 2021; 372: n71
- Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument.ANZ J Surg. 2003; 73: 712-716
- Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2005; 5: 13
- Closing the Gap between Methodologists and End-Users:Ras a Computational Back-End.Journal of Statistical Software. 2012; 49
- Femoral marrow cavity bone harvesting used for arthroscopic refilling of misplaced or enlarged bone tunnels in revision ACL surgery: an arthroscopically supported technique with antegrade intramedullary bone harvesting by a reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA) system.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 23: 808-815
- Allograft Bone Dowels Show Better Incorporation in Femoral Versus Tibial Tunnels in 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Computed Tomography-Based Analysis.Arthroscopy. 2021; 37: 1920-1928
- Two-stage procedure in anterior cruciate ligament revision surgery: a five-year follow-up prospective study.Int Orthop. 2013; 37: 1369-1374
- Healing of tibial bone tunnels after bone grafting for staged revision anterior cruciate ligament surgery: A prospective computed tomography analysis.Knee. 2016; 23: 830-836
- The Occurrence of Meniscal and Chondral Injury in Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Consecutive Case Series.J Knee Surg. 2020; 33: 223-227
- Revision surgery after failed ACL reconstruction with artificial ligaments: clinical, histologic and radiographic evaluation.Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014; 24: 93-98
- Autologous Bone Graft Versus Silicate-Substituted Calcium Phosphate in the Treatment of Tunnel Defects in 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study With a Minimum Follow-up of 2 Years.Arthroscopy. 2020; 36: 178-185
- Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a 2-stage technique with bone grafting of the tibial tunnel.Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33: 1701-1709
- Outcomes after bone grafting in patients with and without ACL revision surgery: a retrospective study.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018; 19: 246
- Outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction secondary to reamer-irrigator-aspirator harvested bone grafting.Injury. 2019; 50: 467-475
- Two-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Our experience using allograft bone dowels.J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2019; 272309499019857736
- Supercritical Carbon Dioxide-Sterilized Bone Allograft in the Treatment of Tunnel Defects in 2-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Histologic Evaluation.Arthroscopy. 2018; 34: 706-713
- Revision ACL Reconstruction: Principles and Practice.Indian J Orthop. 2021; 55: 263-275
- Controversies in ACL revision surgery: Italian expert group consensus and state of the art.J Orthop Traumatol. 2022; 23: 32
- One-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in cases with excessive tunnel osteolysis. Results of a new technique using impaction bone grafting.Knee. 2018; 25: 1308-1317
- Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Bone Graft Options for Tunnel Augmentation.Am J Sports Med. 2020; 48: 767-777
- Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Silicate-Substituted Calcium Phosphate.Arthrosc Tech. 2019; 8: e1239-e1246
- Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Cannulated Allograft Bone Dowels Soaked in Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate.Arthrosc Tech. 2021; 10: e2699-e2708
- Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the United States.Orthop J Sports Med. 2015; 32325967114563664
- Evaluation of a one-stage ACL revision technique using bone void filler after cyclic loading.Knee. 2012; 19: 477-481
- Incorporating BMP-2 and skeletal muscle to a semitendinosus autograft in an oversized tunnel yields robust bone tunnel ossification in rabbits: Toward single-step revision of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Knee. 2018; 25: 765-773
- Outside-In Drilling Allows Avoidance of Two-Stage Surgery in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Arthrosc Tech. 2021; 10: e691-e696
Article info
Publication history
Publication stage
In Press Journal Pre-ProofFootnotes
Author 1: Varun Gopinatth (Contribution: substantial conception/design of work, performed measurements, analysis and interpretation of data for the work, drafting the work, critically revising the work, manuscript preparation, approving final version for publication, and agreement for accountability of all aspects of work)
Author 2: Felipe J. Casanova (Contribution: substantial conception/design of work, performed measurements, analysis and interpretation of data for the work, drafting the work, approving final version for publication, and agreement for accountability of all aspects of work)
Author 3: Derrick M. Knapik (Contribution: substantial conception/design of work, performed measurements, drafting the work, critically revising the work, manuscript preparation, approving final version for publication, and agreement for accountability of all aspects of work)
Author 4: Enzo S. Mameri (Contribution: substantial conception/design of work, analysis and interpretation of data for the work, drafting the work, critically revising the work, manuscript preparation, approving final version for publication, and agreement for accountability of all aspects of work)
Author 5: Garrett R. Jackson (Contribution: substantial conception/design of work, performed measurements, critically revising the work, manuscript preparation, approving final version for publication, and agreement for accountability of all aspects of work)
Author 6: Zeeshan A. Khan (Contribution: substantial conception/design of work, drafting the work, critically revising the work, manuscript preparation, approving final version for publication, and agreement for accountability of all aspects of work)
Author 7: Johnathon R. McCormick (Contribution: substantial conception/design of work, revising of the work for important intellectual content, manuscript preparation, approving final version for publication, and agreement for accountability of all aspects of work)
Author 8: Adam B. Yanke (Contribution: substantial conception/design of work, revising of the work for important intellectual content, manuscript preparation, approving final version for publication, and agreement for accountability of all aspects of work)
Author 9: Brian J. Cole (Contribution: substantial conception/design of work, revising of the work for important intellectual content, manuscript preparation, approving final version for publication, and agreement for accountability of all aspects of work)
Author 10: Jorge Chahla (Contribution: substantial conception/design of work, revising of the work for important intellectual content, manuscript preparation, approving final version for publication, and agreement for accountability of all aspects of work)
Twitter: @vgopinatth, @EnzoMameri, @Grjacksoo, @zeeahmkhan, @AdamYankeMD, @BrianColeMD, @jachahla
